sendfile(2) fails for devices?
sendfile(2) fails with -EINVAL every time I try to read from a device file.
This sounds like a bug... is it? (the man page doesn't mention such a restriction)
I am using kernel 2.4.0-test11-pre2. All other tests with sendfile(2)
succeed: file->file, file->STDOUT, STDIN->file...
Signature · 7 lines
Jeff Garzik | Building 1024 | Would you like a Twinkie? MandrakeSoft | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
In article <[email protected]>,
Quoted 5 lines · Jeff Garzik
sendfile(2) fails with
-EINVALevery time I try to read from a device file.This sounds like a bug... is it? (the man page doesn't mention such a restriction)
sendfile() on purpose only works on things that use the page cache. EINVAL is basically sendfiles way of saying "I would fall back on doing a read+write, so you might as well do it yourself in user space because it might actually be more efficient that way".
Quoted 2 lines
I am using kernel 2.4.0-test11-pre2. All other tests with sendfile(2)
succeed:file->file,file->STDOUT,STDIN->file...
Yes, as long as STDIN is a file ;)
sendfile() wants the source to be in the page cache, because the whole point of sendfile() was to avoid a copy.
The current device model does _not_ use the page cache. Now, arguably that's a bug - it also means that you cannot mmap() a block device - but as it could be easily documented (maybe it is, somewhere), I'll call it a bad feature for now.
Now, if you want to add the code to do address spaces for block devices, I wouldn't be all that unhappy. I've wanted to see it for a while. I'm not likely to apply it for 2.4.x any more, but I'd love to have it early for 2.5.x.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/