Skip to contentSkip to conversation

report on no-overcommit testing for diskless box

DISCUSSION David L. Parsley 1 participant 1 message Mar 28, 2001 Memory management

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

So after lots of patching I got my terminal running with no-overcommit. X wouldn't start at all - presumably it asks for more memory than is present and just doesn't use most of it normally.

If the patch becomes available for a recent 2.4.2-ac, I'll try it on a larger terminal with more memory. I can still crash a 64MB diskless x terminal by running xchat full screen (at 1152x900x16bit) - hopefully no-overcommit will indeed cure bigger machines like this one.

I guess small-mem embedded will need to both patch X _and_ run no-overcommit for stability.

regards,
David

Signature · 7 lines
David L. Parsley
Network Administrator
Roanoke College
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/