HPT370 RAID-1 or Software RAID-1, what's "best"?
Quoted 11 lines · Martin Eriksson
What is "best" on Linux 2.4.X (with any appropriate patches) ?
HPT370 RAID-1 or Software RAID-1 ?
And if Software RAID-1 is best of these two, where is it most stable; on an i815 chipset, a VIA chipset (686B) or on a promise controller?
I define "best" as:
* most stable
* least complex setup
* least hassle when something goes wrong
Software RAID is just your disk configuration. But I'd recommend hardware raid because the rebuild after one disk crash is dog slow with software raid. This problem been discussed in all possible linux magazines...
I prefer SCSI RAID5
Thunder
Signature · 13 lines
begin-base64 755 - IyEgL3Vzci9iaW4vcGVybApteSAgICAgJHNheWluZyA9CSMgVGhlIHNjcmlw dCBvbiB0aGUgbGVmdCBpcyB0aGUgcHJvb2YKIk5lbmEgaXN0IGVpbiIgLgkj IHRoYXQgaXQgaXNuJ3QgYWxsIHRoZSB3YXkgaXQgc2VlbXMKIiB2ZXJhbHRl dGVyICIgLgkjIHRvIGJlIChlc3BlY2lhbGx5IG5vdCB3aXRoIG1lKQoiTkRX LVN0YXIuXG4iICA7CiRzYXlpbmcgPX4Kcy9ORFctU3Rhci9rYW5uXAogdW5z IHJldHRlbi9nICA7CiRzYXlpbmcgICAgICAgPX4Kcy92ZXJhbHRldGVyL2Rp XAplIExpZWJlL2c7CiRzYXlpbmcgPX5zL2Vpbi8KbnVyL2c7JHNheWluZyA9 fgpzL2lzdC9zYWd0LC9nICA7CiRzYXlpbmc9fnMvXG4vL2cKO3ByaW50Zigk c2F5aW5nKQo7cHJpbnRmKCJcbiIpOwo= ==== Extract this and see what will happen if you execute my signature. Just save it to file and do a
Quoted 1 line
uudecode $file | perl
Quoted 4 lines
Software RAID is just your disk configuration. But I'd recommend hardware raid because the rebuild after one disk crash is dog slow with software raid. This problem been discussed in all possible linux magazines...
The raid rebuild time is identical for pretty much any set up. With the softraid its intentionally defaulting to a low fraction of I/O bandwidth so it doesnt disrupt normal operation.
Also as far is his question goes - both are software raid
HPT370 IDE Raid is not really an hardware raid.
It is a software Raid, since Linux does not use tha raid implementation that comes with the BIOS, but it uses softwareraid.
Quoted 42 lines · Thunder from the hill
Quoted 11 lines · Martin Eriksson
What is "best" on Linux 2.4.X (with any appropriate patches) ?
HPT370 RAID-1 or Software RAID-1 ?
And if Software RAID-1 is best of these two, where is it most stable; on an i815 chipset, a VIA chipset (686B) or on a promise controller?
I define "best" as:
* most stable
* least complex setup
* least hassle when something goes wrongSoftware RAID is just your disk configuration. But I'd recommend hardware raid because the rebuild after one disk crash is dog slow with software raid. This problem been discussed in all possible linux magazines...
I prefer SCSI RAID5Thunder
--
begin-base64 755 - IyEgL3Vzci9iaW4vcGVybApteSAgICAgJHNheWluZyA9CSMgVGhlIHNjcmlw dCBvbiB0aGUgbGVmdCBpcyB0aGUgcHJvb2YKIk5lbmEgaXN0IGVpbiIgLgkj IHRoYXQgaXQgaXNuJ3QgYWxsIHRoZSB3YXkgaXQgc2VlbXMKIiB2ZXJhbHRl dGVyICIgLgkjIHRvIGJlIChlc3BlY2lhbGx5IG5vdCB3aXRoIG1lKQoiTkRX LVN0YXIuXG4iICA7CiRzYXlpbmcgPX4Kcy9ORFctU3Rhci9rYW5uXAogdW5z IHJldHRlbi9nICA7CiRzYXlpbmcgICAgICAgPX4Kcy92ZXJhbHRldGVyL2Rp XAplIExpZWJlL2c7CiRzYXlpbmcgPX5zL2Vpbi8KbnVyL2c7JHNheWluZyA9 fgpzL2lzdC9zYWd0LC9nICA7CiRzYXlpbmc9fnMvXG4vL2cKO3ByaW50Zigk c2F5aW5nKQo7cHJpbnRmKCJcbiIpOwo=
====
Extract this and see what will happen if you execute my signature. Just save it to file and do aQuoted 1 line
uudecode $file | perl
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Luigi Genoni" <[email protected]>
To: "Thunder from the hill" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; "Martin Eriksson" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: HPT370 RAID-1 or Software RAID-1, what's "best"?
Quoted 3 lines
HPT370 IDE Raid is not really an hardware raid.
It is a software Raid, since Linux does not use tha raid implementation that comes with the BIOS, but it uses softwareraid.
Well, even if it uses the BIOS raid, the CPU still has to do all the work. You can easily spot true hardware raid because of the largish PCI boards, and the big onboard processors. But this is a budget project... so no true hardware raid.
I have come to a conclusion now though... as this machine will be used without a monitor, any RAID arrays will be controlled via a web application. To do this I need software RAID. Also, from the start it will be running the following config:
Celeron-II CPU on an i815 board, 256MB RAM
P/M: Boot drive, temporary backup storage for CD-R backup (a few gigs) P/S: RAID-1 disk #1
S/M: CD-RW drive
S/S: RAID-1 disk #2
In the future, if more storage is needed, there will propably be a three to four-disk RAID-5 array with some/all disks on a promise controller.
Now this has gone off-topic, so please send replies only to me.
PS. the "mdadm" package is very nice. Among other things it solved the "array is in use" problem.
Quoted 1 line · Martin Eriksson
Now this has gone off-topic, so please send replies only to me.
CC me please. :)
Gruß
Uli
Signature · 1 line
'The box said, 'Requires Windows 95 or better', so i installed Linux - TKK 5