Skip to contentSkip to conversation

IPC lock patch performance improvement

DISCUSSION Duc Vianney 2 participants 2 messages Aug 5, 2002 – Aug 6, 2002

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

I ran the LMbench Pipe and IPC latency test bucket against the IPC lock patch from Mingming Cao and found the patch improves the performance of those functions from 1% to 9%. See the attached data. The kernel under test is 2.5.29, SMP kernel running on a 4-way 500 MHz. The data for 2.5.29s4-ipc represents the average of three runs.

                                                           Percent
                                  2.5.29s4 2.5.29s4-ipc Improvement
Pipe latency                         12.51     11.43         9%
AF_Unix sock stream latency          21.61     19.82         8%
UDP latency using localhost          36.28     35.12         3%
TCP latency using localhost          56.90     54.89         4%
RPC/tcp latency using local host    123.30    121.91         1%
RPC/udp latency using localhost      89.78     88.70         1%
TCP/IP connection cost to localhost 192.74    187.76         3%

Note: Latency is in microseconds
Note: 2.5.29s4 is the base 2.5.29 SMP kernel running on a 4-way, 2.5.29s4-ipc is the base 2.5.29 SMP kernel built with IPC lock patch.

Duc. [email protected]

#1 lore raw
Quoted 15 lines · Duc Vianney

I ran the LMbench Pipe and IPC latency test bucket against the IPC lock patch from Mingming Cao and found the patch improves the performance of those functions from 1% to 9%. See the attached data. The kernel under test is 2.5.29, SMP kernel running on a 4-way 500 MHz. The data for 2.5.29s4-ipc represents the average of three runs.

                                                           Percent
                                  2.5.29s4 2.5.29s4-ipc Improvement
Pipe latency                         12.51     11.43         9%
AF_Unix sock stream latency          21.61     19.82         8%
UDP latency using localhost          36.28     35.12         3%
TCP latency using localhost          56.90     54.89         4%
RPC/tcp latency using local host    123.30    121.91         1%
RPC/udp latency using localhost      89.78     88.70         1%
TCP/IP connection cost to localhost 192.74    187.76         3%
Quoted 3 lines

Note: Latency is in microseconds
Note: 2.5.29s4 is the base 2.5.29 SMP kernel running on a 4-way, 2.5.29s4-ipc is the base 2.5.29 SMP kernel built with IPC lock patch.

Please show me I'm wrong, but so far as I can see (from source and breakpoints) LMbench never touches the SysV IPC code, which is the only code affected by Mingming's proposed IPC locking changes. I believe LMbench tests InterProcessCommunication via pipes and sockets, not via the SysV IPC msg sem and shm.

If that's right, then your improvement is magical; but we can hope for even better when the appropriate codepaths are tested.

Hugh