Skip to contentSkip to conversation

My Matrox G200 died with 2.5.51

DISCUSSION nomero 2 participants 2 messages Dec 16, 2002 – Dec 20, 2002 Framebuffer layer

lore
Share & tools
lore

nomero

author
#0 lore raw

Hi all.
I compiled the new 2.5.51 kernel and enabled the new framebuffer with the VESA generic driver.
My system is a Slackware 8.0. My graphic card was a Matrox G200 and the resolution of fb console was 1024 X 768, 16M of colors (0x318). When I rebooted with my new kernel, i noted that fb didn't work well (when i switched from a tty to another, some parts of the first tty were "pasted" to the second). When I rebooted, my Matrox G200 died definetly. I've made something wrong or it's an fb's bug?
If it is a bug, I hope to have been helpful.
see you,

Moreno

-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/

#1 lore raw
Quoted 12 lines

I compiled the new 2.5.51 kernel and enabled the new framebuffer with the VESA generic driver.
My system is a Slackware 8.0. My graphic card was a Matrox G200 and the resolution of fb console was 1024 X 768, 16M of colors (0x318). When I rebooted with my new kernel, i noted that fb didn't work well (when i switched from a tty to another, some parts of the first tty were "pasted" to the second).
When I rebooted, my Matrox G200 died definetly. I've made something wrong or it's an fb's bug?
If it is a bug, I hope to have been helpful.
see you,

Your card died :-( Sounds like your hardware bit the dust. The VESA code isn't able to kill any cards as it depends on the BIOS to do the right thing.

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: The Best Geek Holiday Gifts! Time is running out! Thinkgeek.com has the coolest gifts for
your favorite geek. Let your fingers do the typing. Visit Now.
T H I N K G E E K . C O M http://www.thinkgeek.com/sf/