Skip to contentSkip to conversation

make lost-tick detection more informative

PATCH Andi Kleen 1 participant 1 message Jan 30, 2003 2 messages not in the archive

lore
Share & tools
lore

Andi Kleen

author
#2 lore raw
In reply to a message not in the archive
Quoted 5 lines · Andrew Morton

I've actually disabled it in -mmnext, because I get too much mail already.

If you want to slap this on top of that and some new kernel-hacking debug config option, that would be neat.

On x86-64/2.4 it is a kernel option "report_lost_ticks"

The overhead is low (single if check in the timer handler), so this is fine.

If you suspect something goes wrong due to bad latency you can just tell the user to turn it on.

-Andi