Skip to contentSkip to conversation

- Wrong use of RTM_BASE in XFRM message types.

PATCH Applied Krishna Kumar 2 participants 2 messages May 23, 2003 – May 26, 2003

Subsystems (2)
Networking Network drivers
lore
Share & tools
lore

Krishna Kumar

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 - Wrong use of RTM_BASE in XFRM message types.

Hi,

I am using 2.5.68 and found XFRM_MSG_BASE being defined, but RTM_BASE used for all XFRM messages, changed it. Current mailer (hopefully) shouldn't screw up the tabs.

Thanks,

- KK

include/linux/xfrm.h +11 -11
diff -ruN linux-2.5.68.org/include/linux/xfrm.h linux-2.5.68/include/linux/xfrm.h
@@ -104,17 +104,17 @@
 /* Netlink configuration messages.  */
 #define XFRM_MSG_BASE		0x10
 
-#define XFRM_MSG_NEWSA		(RTM_BASE + 0)
-#define XFRM_MSG_DELSA		(RTM_BASE + 1)
-#define XFRM_MSG_GETSA		(RTM_BASE + 2)
-
-#define XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY	(RTM_BASE + 3)
-#define XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY	(RTM_BASE + 4)
-#define XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY	(RTM_BASE + 5)
-
-#define XFRM_MSG_ALLOCSPI	(RTM_BASE + 6)
-#define XFRM_MSG_ACQUIRE	(RTM_BASE + 7)
-#define XFRM_MSG_EXPIRE		(RTM_BASE + 8)
+#define XFRM_MSG_NEWSA		(XFRM_MSG_BASE + 0)
+#define XFRM_MSG_DELSA		(XFRM_MSG_BASE + 1)
+#define XFRM_MSG_GETSA		(XFRM_MSG_BASE + 2)
+
+#define XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY	(XFRM_MSG_BASE + 3)
+#define XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY	(XFRM_MSG_BASE + 4)
+#define XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY	(XFRM_MSG_BASE + 5)
+
+#define XFRM_MSG_ALLOCSPI	(XFRM_MSG_BASE + 6)
+#define XFRM_MSG_ACQUIRE	(XFRM_MSG_BASE + 7)
+#define XFRM_MSG_EXPIRE		(XFRM_MSG_BASE + 8)
 
 #define XFRM_MSG_MAX		(XFRM_MSG_EXPIRE+1)
Applied
#1 lore raw

From: Krishna Kumar <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 11:14:10 -0700

I am using 2.5.68 and found XFRM_MSG_BASE being defined, but RTM_BASE used for all XFRM messages, changed it. Current mailer (hopefully) shouldn't screw up the tabs.

Applied, thank you.