strtok non reentrant

DISCUSSION peter enderborg 2 participants 2 messages Aug 19, 2003

Share & tools

peter enderborg

author

2003-08-19 10:39 UTC #0 lore raw

Why do the 2.4 kernel having the non reentrant strtok() functions? Is there any reason at all not to have strtok_r() instead?

2003-08-19 10:55 UTC #1 lore raw

Quoted 3 lines · peter enderborg

Why do the 2.4 kernel having the non reentrant strtok() functions? Is there any reason at all not to have
strtok_r() instead?

You probably want strsep(). strtok() seems to be deprecated.