Skip to contentSkip to conversation

autofs and namespaces

DISCUSSION Tim Hockin 2 participants 2 messages Aug 20, 2003 – Aug 22, 2003

lore
Share & tools
lore

Tim Hockin

author
#0 lore raw

For lack of clear insight into this, I thought I might put this out for opinions.

We're examining autofs and issues customers are having with it. One of the issues that came up during discussions of things we can do is namespaces.

Does anyone have any ideas how namespaces and autofs ought to play together? There are some obvious answers, but it seems to me that they might not be correct.

Anyone out there want to throw some ideas out? We can just ignore it, but that isn't exactly nice. What we really need is some guidance on what kind of sematics are "correct".

Tim

Signature · 4 lines
Tim Hockin
Systems Software Engineer
Sun Microsystems, Linux Kernel Engineering
[email protected]
#1 lore raw

Hi Tim,

Fact is that I am just now starting to look at 2.6 and the issues relating to it wrt autofs.

Perhaps you (or someone else) could help by giving me a 5 cent tour of the issues as you see them.

Quoted 6 lines · Tim Hockin

For lack of clear insight into this, I thought I might put this out for opinions.

We're examining autofs and issues customers are having with it. One of the issues that came up during discussions of things we can do is namespaces.

Customers are having trouble with it.

One of them would be me.

As you have seen on the autofs list I have been working to improve Sun <-> Linux automount integration for some time now and while I don't have a complete solution I have made significant progress, in an operational sense.

With luck and effort I expect to have a release available soonish.

Quoted 4 lines

Does anyone have any ideas how namespaces and autofs ought to play together? There are some obvious answers, but it seems to me that they might not be correct.

This sounds very interesting but I am deep into getting an operational release for the 2.4 kernel right now. Anything I can do, at least for a while, will be a cursory survey.

Quoted 4 lines

Anyone out there want to throw some ideas out? We can just ignore it, but that isn't exactly nice. What we really need is some guidance on what kind of sematics are "correct".

Don't want to ignore it but ....

Signature · 4 lines
   ,-._|\    Ian Kent
  /      \   Perth, Western Australia
  *_.--._/   E-mail: [email protected]
        v    Web: http://themaw.net/