Skip to contentSkip to conversation

win3.1 attempts :)

DISCUSSION Stas Sergeev 2 participants 2 messages Sep 22, 2003 – Sep 23, 2003

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hello.

Quoted 3 lines · Ryan Underwood
Quoted 1 line

No idea, but if not, then it starts dosx.exe directly, which is very likely.

No win.com, dosx.exe, or win386.exe exists after the first stage of
installation in dosemu. I just verified this.

And I just verified that replacing dosx.ex_ with os2k386.ex_ makes the install to go as far as a graphical screen, under dosemu, just as I expected. I have to interrupt it at that stage - no time for experiments now. Probably at a week-end.

Quoted 1 line

Look at the function at 014:11f7 in setup.exe. It pushes the string "winexec" and "krnl386.exe" among other things

What's the use? I just tried what I suggested, and it seems to work (at a first glance at least). Trying something before assuming that it doesn't work, can sometimes save some work:)

Quoted 1 line

BTW, WFW only runs in enhanced mode, correct?

Via win.com at least - yes. That's why I still think replacing dosx.exe with os2k386.exe is OK, while replacing the win386.exe is not - it will always force the winos2 mode, which is not good.

Quoted 1 line

Why would it need dosx.exe in that case ?

It can be started directly.

Quoted 1 line

Does dosx.exe starting WFW cause it to run in enhanced mode anyway?

I don't think so, but might be trivial to figure. Just look into "Help->About" in a Program Manager to find out.

#1 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines · Stas Sergeev

Hello.

Quoted 2 lines · Ryan Underwood
Quoted 2 lines

No idea, but if not, then it starts dosx.exe directly, which is very likely.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines

No win.com, dosx.exe, or win386.exe exists after the first stage of installation in dosemu. I just verified this.

And I just verified that replacing dosx.ex_ with os2k386.ex_ makes the install to go as far as a graphical screen, under dosemu, just as I expected. I have to interrupt it at that stage - no time for experiments now. Probably at a week-end.

Yes, I see that it does. However, using the os2k386 in place of dosx in the install files seems to cause dosemu to have some filesystem-related problems. The first error is that it is "unable to update registration info", and then when going to file copy, there are lots of "Write error:
FOO.BAR The file is write protected. Error Code #210"

It is the same with all 3 MS-DOS, DR-DOS, FreeDOS.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Look at the function at 014:11f7 in setup.exe. It pushes the string "winexec" and "krnl386.exe" among other things

What's the use? I just tried what I suggested, and it seems to work (at a first glance at least). Trying something before assuming that it doesn't work, can sometimes save some work:)

I do not see harm, nor stupidity, in at least attempting to understand how something works before making shots in the dark.

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line

Does dosx.exe starting WFW cause it to run in enhanced mode anyway?

I don't think so, but might be trivial to figure. Just look into "Help->About" in a Program Manager to find out.

To do that, one would need a working installation, which you have and I do not. :)

Signature · 1 line
Ryan Underwood, <nemesis at icequake.net>, icq=10317253