Skip to contentSkip to conversation

win3.1 attempts :)

DISCUSSION Stas Sergeev 2 participants 2 messages Sep 23, 2003 – Sep 24, 2003

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hello.

Quoted 1 line · Ryan Underwood

Yes, I see that it does. However, using the os2k386 in place of dosx in the install files seems to cause dosemu to have some filesystem-related problems.

Just tried under pure DOS - the same problems. So I suspect it is the os2k386 that is buggy at that point.

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line

least). Trying something before assuming that it doesn't work, can sometimes save some work:)

I do not see harm, nor stupidity, in at least attempting to understand how something works before making shots in the dark.

The harm is a waste of time only.
And btw, this was not a shot in the dark. As both that windows (3.1 and wfwg) are using a standard mode during the install, replacing the dosx.exe was the most obvious thing it seems.

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line

Just look into "Help->About" in a Program Manager to find out.

To do that, one would need a working installation, which you have

Not any more. I just tried the installation under a real DOS (to see about the "filesystem problems"), and, as I am half asleep after work, I ocasionally deleted it instead of the directory created during that test install. I still have the win3.11 distro somewhere in the streammer tape, but there were the whole lot of the old goodies, winword6 with a bunch of my (and other's) old documents, and many other not very important but still interesting things. Now as this all is finally gone, I suddenly lost any interest in running windows under dosemu. I still have the 3.1 installed for testing, but without the winword and everything this is not funny any more...

#1 lore raw

Hi,

Quoted 7 lines · Stas Sergeev

The harm is a waste of time only.
And btw, this was not a shot in the dark. As both that windows (3.1 and wfwg) are using a standard mode during the install, replacing the dosx.exe was the most obvious thing it seems.

Maybe obvious to someone who knew they are using standard mode during the install only. :P
I thought WFW3.11 had _no_ standard mode whatsoever.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line

Just look into "Help->About" in a Program Manager to find out.

To do that, one would need a working installation, which you have

Not any more. I just tried the installation under a real DOS (to see about the "filesystem problems"), and, as I am half asleep after work, I ocasionally deleted it instead of the directory created during that test install.

Damn! Well, I suppose I'll get to be the one to look into this problem further.

Later,

Signature · 1 line
Ryan Underwood, <nemesis at icequake.net>, icq=10317253