Oops on APM wakeup on 2.4.22/23-pre, works with 2.6.0-test
Hi,
Quoted 4 lines
Perhaps the same bug I fixed today in 2.6?
Could you try the attached patch? It's untested but should fix the double oops.
OK, it did. Thanks.
With your patch none of the trace gets printed, so maybe the stack is really messed somehow. Now I get the oops, but the machine wakes up and works normally afterwards. The output is:
ksymoops 2.4.9 on i586 2.4.23-pre7-ford. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.23-pre7-ford/ (default) -m /boot/System.map-2.4.23-pre7-ford (default)
Warning: You did not tell me where to find symbol information. I will assume that the log matches the kernel and modules that are running right now and I'll use the default options above for symbol resolution. If the current kernel and/or modules do not match the log, you can get more accurate output by telling me the kernel version and where to find map, modules, ksyms etc. ksymoops -h explains the options.
Oct 13 07:37:21 ford kernel: NMI: IOCK error (debug interrupt?) Oct 13 07:37:21 ford kernel: CPU: 0 Oct 13 07:37:21 ford kernel: EIP: 0050:[<000047ce>] Not tainted Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386 Oct 13 07:37:21 ford kernel: EFLAGS: 00000082 Oct 13 07:37:21 ford kernel: eax: 00270000 ebx: 07000001 ecx: 00000002 edx: 00000000 Oct 13 07:37:21 ford kernel: esi: c5a8b420 edi: 00000096 ebp: 00000096 esp: c4fb7ef2 Oct 13 07:37:21 ford kernel: ds: 0000 es: 0000 ss: 0018 Oct 13 07:37:21 ford kernel: Process apmd (pid: 259, stackpage=c4fb7000) Oct 13 07:37:21 ford kernel: Stack: 0000ea27 00000096 0000c27b 5307c064 c03ac03f 00000048 f79d0000 0010c010 Oct 13 07:37:21 ford kernel: 00000000 00960000 00180000 00180000 12150000 0000c012 0000c117 41020000 Oct 13 07:37:21 ford kernel: b4200000 11c0c5a8 6400c500 f862c4fc 5307c010 00010000 00020000 7f540000 Oct 13 07:37:21 ford kernel: Call Trace: Oct 13 07:37:21 ford kernel: Code: Bad EIP value.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
EIP;
000047ceBefore first symbol <=====esi;
c5a8b420<_end+57aff14/6562b54>
esp;c4fb7ef2<_end+4cdc9e6/6562b54>
1 warning issued. Results may not be reliable.
Quoted 2 lines
Any objections against adding lkml back to the cc list? I dropped it accidentially.
OK, I added the addresses back.
Thanks
Signature · 1 line
Stano