Skip to contentSkip to conversation

arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c linux-2.6.0-test10

PATCH In review John Blackwood 2 participants 2 messages Nov 24, 2003 – Nov 25, 2003

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c linux-2.6.0-test10

Hi Andi,

In linux-2.6.0-test10, I believe that there are several lines of code in the x86_64 version of handle_signal() that will not ever be executed and can most likely be removed.

I also believe that there are several lines that should be added to the end of the do_signal() routine for handling the -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK case.

Thank you.

arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c 2003-11-24 11:30:18.000000000 -0500 renamed from arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c 2003-11-23 20:32:33.000000000 -0500 +0 -4
diff -ru linux-2.6.0-test10/arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c
@@ -371,10 +371,6 @@
                               regs->rax = regs->orig_rax;
                               regs->rip -= 2;
               }
-               if (regs->rax == (unsigned long)-ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK){
-                       regs->rax = __NR_restart_syscall;
-                       regs->rip -= 2;
-               }
       }
 

#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
@@ -453,6 +449,10 @@

                       regs->rax = regs->orig_rax;
                       regs->rip -= 2;
               }

+ else if (res == -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK) {
+ regs->rax = __NR_restart_syscall;
+ regs->rip -= 2;
+ }

       }
       return 0;
}
#1 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · John Blackwood

Hi Andi,

In linux-2.6.0-test10, I believe that there are several lines of code in the x86_64 version of handle_signal() that will not ever be executed and can most likely be removed.

I also believe that there are several lines that should be added to the end of the do_signal() routine for handling the -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK case.

Thanks, John. Was a mismerge. I added the change to my tree.

-Andi