Skip to contentSkip to conversation

2.6.7-np2

DISCUSSION Nick Piggin 4 participants 7 messages Jun 28, 2004 – Jul 1, 2004

lore
Share & tools
lore

Nick Piggin

author
#0 lore raw

http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/2.6.7-np2.gz

This is against 2.6.7-mm3. I can do one against -bk if anyone would like.

It should fix scheduler problems and compile problems in 2.6.7-np1.

It contains my CPU scheduler and memory management stuff. If anyone is having swapping or interactivity problems, please try it out.

#5 lore raw
In reply to Nick Piggin

must I still renice X to get your patch run without responsive-lose during I/O e.g with cdparanoia? thx

I had to edit fs/hfsplus/inode.c to get it compile properly

hfsplus/inode.c 2004-07-01 00:42:00.685145048 +0200 renamed from hfsplus/inode.c.orig 2004-07-01 00:51:52.347198744 +0200 +1 -1
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
                               res = 0;
                       else for (i = 0; i < tree->pages_per_bnode; i++) {
                               if (PageActiveMapped(node->page[i]) ||
-                                       PageActiveUnmapped(node->page[i]))) {
+                                       PageActiveUnmapped(node->page[i])) {
                                       res = 0;
                                       break;
Quoted 9 lines · Nick Piggin

http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/2.6.7-np2.gz

This is against 2.6.7-mm3. I can do one against -bk if anyone would like.

It should fix scheduler problems and compile problems in 2.6.7-np1.

It contains my CPU scheduler and memory management stuff. If anyone is having swapping or interactivity problems, please try it out.

author
#6 lore raw
Quoted 1 line · Frieder Buerzele

must I still renice X to get your patch run without responsive-lose during I/O e.g with cdparanoia?

It would help if X were reniced, yes. Try it and see though.

Quoted 4 lines

thx

I had to edit fs/hfsplus/inode.c to get it compile properly

Thanks.