VM - is "reserved memory for root" possible (in case of a leak)?
Hello,
Short nature of a problem:
Recently I was playing with Apache2 as a proxy + mod_clamav as a virus scanner, put some load to it, and in a short time hanged the machine (actually, it was short of memory, and it stopped to respond - in logs I saw VM was killing some other processes, unfortunately not Apache).
As I could reach the machine only remotely, it was no wonder I run into troubles...
Sounds familiar?
Solution?
I was thinking, if there is something like:
"reserved_min_memory_for_root = 10M" "reserved_min_memory_processes = /usr/sbin/sshd, /usr/sbin/pppd, etc.etc"
Which would just give that memory for those processes "once and for all", and thus, saving trouble in case of a memory leak, uncontrolled process, or similar.
I know it would be tricky to implement it, because the question arises, what happens if we have no memory left, and these "reserved_min_memory_processes" begin to grow?
But I think it would be something like a comparison:
ulimit vs this "reserved_min_memory_for_root", and quota vs -m option from mke2fs.
Is there something like it already in the kernel?
It would be similar to mke2fs for the filesystem:
# man mke2fs
-m reserved-blocks-percentage
Specify the percentage of the filesystem blocks reserved
for the
super-user. This value defaults to 5%
Regards,
Tomasz Chmielewski
Quoted 38 lines · Tomasz Chmielewski
Hello,
Short nature of a problem:
Recently I was playing with Apache2 as a proxy +
mod_clamavas a virus scanner, put some load to it, and in a short time hanged the machine (actually, it was short of memory, and it stopped to respond - in logs I saw VM was killing some other processes, unfortunately not Apache).As I could reach the machine only remotely, it was no wonder I run into troubles...
Sounds familiar?
Solution?
I was thinking, if there is something like:
"
reserved_min_memory_for_root= 10M" "reserved_min_memory_processes=/usr/sbin/sshd,/usr/sbin/pppd, etc.etc"Which would just give that memory for those processes "once and for all", and thus, saving trouble in case of a memory leak, uncontrolled process, or similar.
I know it would be tricky to implement it, because the question arises, what happens if we have no memory left, and these "
reserved_min_memory_processes" begin to grow?But I think it would be something like a comparison:
ulimit vs this "
reserved_min_memory_for_root", and quota vs -m option from mke2fs.Is there something like it already in the kernel?
Quoted 8 lines
It would be similar to mke2fs for the filesystem:
# man mke2fs-m reserved-blocks-percentage
Specify the percentage of the filesystem blocks reserved
for the
super-user. This value defaults to 5%
Hi Tomasz,
Maybe you would want to tune /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes or renice +xx apache.Some vmstat 1 report, uname -a could be interesting as well.There's no per profile VM granularity in 2.6.
Regards,
FabF
Quoted 13 lines
Regards,
Tomasz Chmielewski
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/