Skip to contentSkip to conversation

kernel for MPC8260 SBC

DISCUSSION Wolfgang Denk 1 participant 1 message Dec 25, 2004 1 message not in the archive

lore
Share & tools
lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#1 lore raw

Suresh,

please read the netiquette. Please never post the same message several times to different newsgroups.

Quoted 5 lines · In message <[email protected]> you wrote:

We developed a SBC based on MPC8260. We are planing to port Linux on it. I downloaded mpc8260 cross compiling tools from denx.de.

I started cross-compiling linux-2.4.4.

Why? 2.4.4 ist very, very old. Use a more recent kernel tree. If you
want to stay in our source tree, then please use the
linuxppc_2_4_devel module on our CVS server.

Quoted 3 lines

The problem is
I am not able to compile kernel. 8260 specific files in arch/ppc are not compiling due to not inclusion of

Then your configuration is broken. The kkernel compiles fine for many boards.

Quoted 2 lines

"bd_t" structure. I Included the file "asm-ppc/bseip.h". Still encountering many errors.

This is not a big surprise. The "bseip.h" header file is for a MPC8xx based board - what makes you think that this might work on your 8260 based hardware?

Quoted 2 lines

I even tried with linux-2.4.20 and encountered the same problems. Is there any patch required for compiling the kernel cleanly.

No. There is no patch needed. The kernel trees are clean. You just have to select a correct configuration. Ummm... and for your custom board you will probably have to port Linux first.

Quoted 1 line

Please provide pointer to the sutiable kernel along with patch.

See for example the linuxppc_2_4_devel module on our CVS server.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

Signature · 3 lines
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected]
Every little picofarad has a nanohenry all its own.      - Don Vonada