Strace doesn't work on linux-2.4.28 and later
Hi, list.
We are using the latest kernel from mips-linux CVS and there is a problem with ptrace.
When syscall with 5 or more arguments are traced, the fifth argument of the syscall is overwritten by tracing code. This error causes problems with strace. For example, you can't trace dynamically linked applications, because ld.so calls mmap which has 6 arguments.
Quoted 8 lines · andreev
Hi, list.
We are using the latest kernel from mips-linux CVS and there is a problem with ptrace.
When syscall with 5 or more arguments are traced, the fifth argument of the syscall is overwritten by tracing code. This error causes problems with strace. For example, you can't trace dynamically linked applications, because ld.so calls mmap which has 6 arguments.
This patch broke it:
http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-cvs/2004-11/msg00116.html
RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/arch/mips/kernel/Attic/scall_o32.S,v retrieving revision 1.18.2.13
retrieving revision 1.18.2.14
arch/mips/kernel/Attic/scall_o32.S +2 -2
@@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ reschedule: trace_a_syscall: SAVE_STATIC - sw t2, PT_R1(sp) + sw t2, PT_SCRATCH0(sp) jal syscall_trace - lw t2, PT_R1(sp) + lw t2, PT_SCRATCH0(sp) lw a0, PT_R4(sp) # Restore argument registers lw a1, PT_R5(sp)
PT_SCRATCH0(sp) = 16(sp) which is where arg5 is stored. This overwrites it.
In arch/mips/tools/offset.c we have:
offset("#define PT_SCRATCH0 ", struct pt_regs, pad0[4]);
offset("#define PT_SCRATCH1 ", struct pt_regs, pad0[5]);I am thinking of testing a patch where I change them to:
offset("#define PT_SCRATCH0 ", struct pt_regs, pad0[0]);
offset("#define PT_SCRATCH1 ", struct pt_regs, pad0[1]);Any needed argument registers are already saved in and restored from the regs array so overwriting the stack area reserved for them should be OK.
David Daney
Quoted 43 lines · David Daney
Quoted 8 lines · andreev
Hi, list.
We are using the latest kernel from mips-linux CVS and there is a problem with ptrace.
When syscall with 5 or more arguments are traced, the fifth argument of the syscall is overwritten by tracing code. This error causes problems with strace. For example, you can't trace dynamically linked applications, because ld.so calls mmap which has 6 arguments.
This patch broke it:
http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-cvs/2004-11/msg00116.html
RCS file:
/home/cvs/linux/arch/mips/kernel/Attic/scall_o32.S,vretrieving revision 1.18.2.13
retrieving revision 1.18.2.14
diff -u -p -r1.18.2.13 -r1.18.2.14
---linux/arch/mips/kernel/Attic/scall_o32.S2004/04/26 15:06:02
1.18.2.13
+++linux/arch/mips/kernel/Attic/scall_o32.S2004/11/25 09:43:59
1.18.2.14arch/mips/kernel/Attic/scall_o32.S +2
-2@@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ reschedule: trace_a_syscall: SAVE_STATIC - sw t2, PT_R1(sp) + sw t2, PT_SCRATCH0(sp) jal syscall_trace - lw t2, PT_R1(sp) + lw t2, PT_SCRATCH0(sp) lw a0, PT_R4(sp) # Restore argument registers lw a1, PT_R5(sp)
PT_SCRATCH0(sp)= 16(sp) which is where arg5 is stored. This overwrites it.In
arch/mips/tools/offset.cwe have:offset("#define PT_SCRATCH0 ", struct pt_regs, pad0[4]); offset("#define PT_SCRATCH1 ", struct pt_regs, pad0[5]);
Quoted 7 lines
I am thinking of testing a patch where I change them to:
offset("#define PT_SCRATCH0 ", struct pt_regs, pad0[0]); offset("#define PT_SCRATCH1 ", struct pt_regs, pad0[1]);Any needed argument registers are already saved in and restored from the regs array so overwriting the stack area reserved for them should be OK.
I now think that is bogus reasoning as the first four slots can be clobbered by the compiler.
It seems that t2 must be saved somewhere in the regs list. I am not sure what the problem with PT_R1(sp) was, but it seems like a good candidate. Perhaps PT_R26 or PT_R27 (k0, k1) would be a better place to store t2 as I don't think k0 or k1 are ever stored.
David Daney.
Quoted 11 lines · David Daney
Quoted 11 lines
offset("#define PT_SCRATCH0 ", struct pt_regs, pad0[4]); offset("#define PT_SCRATCH1 ", struct pt_regs, pad0[5]);I am thinking of testing a patch where I change them to:
offset("#define PT_SCRATCH0 ", struct pt_regs, pad0[0]); offset("#define PT_SCRATCH1 ", struct pt_regs, pad0[1]);Any needed argument registers are already saved in and restored from the regs array so overwriting the stack area reserved for them should be OK.
Quoted 7 lines
I now think that is bogus reasoning as the first four slots can be clobbered by the compiler.
It seems that t2 must be saved somewhere in the regs list. I am not sure what the problem with
PT_R1(sp)was, but it seems like a good candidate. PerhapsPT_R26orPT_R27(k0, k1) would be a better place to store t2 as I don't think k0 or k1 are ever stored.
I was always planning to backport the newer fix from 2.6 which is simply storing the value in a caller saved register. You now reminded me of that omission ;-)
Patch below,
Ralf
Index: arch/mips/kernel/scall_o32.S
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/arch/mips/kernel/Attic/scall_o32.S,v retrieving revision 1.18.2.14
mips/kernel/scall_o32.S +2 -3
@@ -121,15 +121,14 @@ trace_a_syscall: SAVE_STATIC - sw t2, PT_SCRATCH0(sp) + move s0, sp jal syscall_trace - lw t2, PT_SCRATCH0(sp) lw a0, PT_R4(sp) # Restore argument registers lw a1, PT_R5(sp) lw a2, PT_R6(sp) lw a3, PT_R7(sp) - jalr t2 + jalr s0 li t0, -EMAXERRNO - 1 # error? sltu t0, t0, v0
Index: arch/mips/tools/offset.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/arch/mips/tools/Attic/offset.c,v retrieving revision 1.16.4.12
mips/tools/offset.c +0 -4
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@#include <linux/types.h> #include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/mm.h> -#include <linux/signal.h> #include <asm/ptrace.h> #include <asm/processor.h>
@@ -37,9 +36,6 @@void output_ptreg_defines (void ) {text ("/* MIPS pt_regs offsets. */" ); - offset("#define PT_SCRATCH0 ", struct pt_regs, pad0[4]); - offset("#define PT_SCRATCH1 ", struct pt_regs, pad0[5]); - offset("#define PT_R0 ", struct pt_regs, regs[0]); offset("#define PT_R1 ", struct pt_regs, regs[1]); offset("#define PT_R2 ", struct pt_regs, regs[2]);
Index: arch/mips64/kernel/scall_64.S
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/arch/mips64/kernel/Attic/scall_64.S,v retrieving revision 1.20.2.20
mips64/kernel/scall_64.S +2 -3
@@ -102,15 +102,14 @@ trace_a_syscall: SAVE_STATIC - sd t2, PT_SCRATCH0(sp) + move s0, t2 jal syscall_trace - ld t2, PT_SCRATCH0(sp) ld a0, PT_R4(sp) # Restore argument registers ld a1, PT_R5(sp) ld a2, PT_R6(sp) ld a3, PT_R7(sp) - jalr t2 + jalr s0 li t0, -EMAXERRNO - 1 # error? sltu t0, t0, v0
Index: arch/mips64/kernel/scall_n32.S
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/arch/mips64/kernel/Attic/scall_n32.S,v retrieving revision 1.2.2.17
mips64/kernel/scall_n32.S +2 -3
@@ -106,15 +106,14 @@ trace_a_syscall: SAVE_STATIC - sd t2, PT_SCRATCH0(sp) + move s0, t2 jal syscall_trace - ld t2, PT_SCRATCH0(sp) ld a0, PT_R4(sp) # Restore argument registers ld a1, PT_R5(sp) ld a2, PT_R6(sp) ld a3, PT_R7(sp) - jalr t2 + jalr s0 li t0, -EMAXERRNO - 1 # error? sltu t0, t0, v0
Index: arch/mips64/kernel/scall_o32.S
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/arch/mips64/kernel/Attic/scall_o32.S,v retrieving revision 1.48.2.33
mips64/kernel/scall_o32.S +2 -3
@@ -118,9 +118,8 @@ sd a6, PT_R10(sp) sd a7, PT_R11(sp) - sd t2, PT_SCRATCH0(sp) + move s0, t2 jal syscall_trace - ld t2, PT_SCRATCH0(sp) ld a0, PT_R4(sp) # Restore argument registers ld a1, PT_R5(sp)
@@ -129,7 +128,7 @@ ld a4, PT_R8(sp) ld a5, PT_R9(sp) - jalr t2 + jalr s0 li t0, -EMAXERRNO - 1 # error? sltu t0, t0, v0
mips/kernel/scall_o32.S line 124
Quoted 13 lines · Ralf Baechle
Index:
arch/mips/kernel/scall_o32.S
===================================================================
RCS file:/home/cvs/linux/arch/mips/kernel/Attic/scall_o32.S,vretrieving revision 1.18.2.14
diff -u -r1.18.2.14scall_o32.Smips/kernel/scall_o32.S +1
-1@@ -121,15 +121,14 @@ trace_a_syscall: SAVE_STATIC - sw t2, PT_SCRATCH0(sp) + move s0, sp
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I think this should be "move s0, t2" as in scall_64.S et al.
David Daney.
Quoted 8 lines · David Daney
mips/kernel/scall_o32.S line 124
Quoted 6 lines
(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -121,15 +121,14 @@
trace_a_syscall:
SAVE_STATICmips/kernel/scall_o32.S +1
-1- sw t2, PT_SCRATCH0(sp) + move s0, sp^^^^^^^^^^^^^I think this should be "move s0, t2" as in
scall_64.Set al.
It should and what I've actually commited in CVS doesn't have this bug.
Ralf