Performance Difference Between Linux NFS Server and Netapp
Subsystems (2)
Thank you! Just the sort of thing I'm looking for ...
Hugh
Quoted 26 lines
From: Chris Penney <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [NFS] Performance Difference Between Linux NFS Server and NetappOn 7/14/05, Hugh Caley <[email protected]> wrote:=20
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 7 lines
=20
A valid point, of course, but I don't think I'm actually expecting a single NFSd to act like an expensive Netapp. I do think that wondering why the Netapp is twice as fast for a sequential write is a valid question, even if the OS and NFS server subsystem are free. I was kind of hoping someone would just say "you're getting what you should expect to get" or "wow, that's slow, try this and this and this".You referenced that you were getting 300 megabits (or 37MB/s). I have=20 several SLES 9 nfs servers (using self compiled 2.6.11.5
<http://2.6.11.5>kernel) running on IBM x345 hardware (dual cpu pentum 4, 2gb ram, dual
qlogic hbas) connected to a single LSI storage array that presents four lun= s=20 ...
Signature · 13 lines
Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you. - Leviticus 11:9-12 http://godhatesshrimp.com Hugh Caley [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs