Some comments on Linux-OMAP tree by Russell King
Quoted 7 lines · Romain Goyet
By the way, Russell also added this :
Quoted 5 lines
Hmm, I notice that omap folk are _still_ buggering up the MMC core in relation to
mmc.c. It'd also be nice of omap folk could conform to the agreed usage of clk_use/unuse vs clk_enable/disable as documented in the header file. The clock framework *relies* on everyone following the rules. Frustrated sigh.
Everybody who is interested in this, "Clock framework" thread on linux-arm-kernel starting with (still ongoing)
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2005-December/032851.html
Dirk