Skip to contentSkip to conversation

libata-dev: Remove ATA_PROT_PIO_MULT

PATCH In review Albert Lee 2 participants 2 messages Mar 16, 2006 – Mar 22, 2006

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Albert Lee

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 libata-dev: Remove ATA_PROT_PIO_MULT

Remove the ATA_PROT_PIO_MULT protocol.

---

The ATA_PROT_PIO_MULT can be handled as ATA_PROT_PIO. Remove it.

Changes:
- Remove the ATA_PROT_PIO_MULT protocol
- Filter out the PIO multi commands in ATA pass through

Patch against the upstream branch
(fb21f0d0ec7e31cc814165e1a9d2662d9c9dd980).

For your review, thanks,

Albert

include/linux/ata.h +0 -1
@@ -204,7 +204,6 @@ enum ata_tf_protocols {
 	ATA_PROT_UNKNOWN,	/* unknown/invalid */
 	ATA_PROT_NODATA,	/* no data */
 	ATA_PROT_PIO,		/* PIO single sector */
-	ATA_PROT_PIO_MULT,	/* PIO multiple sector */
 	ATA_PROT_DMA,		/* DMA */
 	ATA_PROT_ATAPI,		/* packet command, PIO data xfer*/
 	ATA_PROT_ATAPI_NODATA,	/* packet command, no data */
drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c +4 -3
@@ -2356,9 +2356,6 @@ ata_scsi_map_proto(u8 byte1)
 
 		case 4:		/* PIO Data-in */
 		case 5:		/* PIO Data-out */
-			if (byte1 & 0xe0) {
-				return ATA_PROT_PIO_MULT;
-			}
 			return ATA_PROT_PIO;
 
 		case 10:	/* Device Reset */
@@ -2397,6 +2394,10 @@ ata_scsi_pass_thru(struct ata_queued_cmd
 	if ((tf->protocol = ata_scsi_map_proto(scsicmd[1])) == ATA_PROT_UNKNOWN)
 		goto invalid_fld;
 
+	if (scsicmd[1] & 0xe0)
+		/* PIO multi not supported yet */
+		goto invalid_fld;
+
 	/*
 	 * 12 and 16 byte CDBs use different offsets to
 	 * provide the various register values.
drivers/scsi/libata-core.c +0 -1
@@ -3905,7 +3905,6 @@ static inline int ata_should_dma_map(str
 
 	case ATA_PROT_ATAPI:
 	case ATA_PROT_PIO:
-	case ATA_PROT_PIO_MULT:
 		if (ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_PIO_DMA)
 			return 1;
 
#1 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · Albert Lee

Remove the ATA_PROT_PIO_MULT protocol.

---

The ATA_PROT_PIO_MULT can be handled as ATA_PROT_PIO. Remove it.

Changes:
- Remove the ATA_PROT_PIO_MULT protocol
- Filter out the PIO multi commands in ATA pass through

applied. it would be nice if you would move the text following "Changes:" from the Albert-comments section to the actual patch description. Anything that can help describe the rationale behind the patch belongs in the main patch description.

The section after the "---" is for related comments, questions, worries, insults, etc. :)

Jeff