Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Cannot receive multicast packets

DISCUSSION Andrew Athan 2 participants 4 messages Apr 20, 2006 – Apr 21, 2006

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

I sent a similar message to LKML, and linux-dev but was directed to this list might as most appropriate. Thanks in advance...

It's likely this is a programming error, but I am at a loss.

The simple UDP multicast receive application below, adapted from source on IBM's web site, will not receive any data. While it is blocked on recv():

hfclinux2:/home/root/UDP/apps/Crosser2# netstat -ang
IPv6/IPv4 Group Memberships
Interface       RefCnt Group
--------------- ------ ---------------------
lo              1      224.0.0.1
eth0            1      224.0.0.1
eth1            1      224.0.17.44
eth1            1      224.0.0.1
lo              1      ff02::1
eth0            1      ff02::1:ffdd:eb2b
eth0            1      ff02::1
eth1            1      ff02::1:ffdd:eb2c
eth1            1      ff02::1

And tcpdump shows traffic arriving at the interface(see below)! This leads me to belive the kernel is filtering it, and or not delivering it to the socket.

The one "strange" thing about this network is that the traffic is flowing in "dense mode", meaning there is no explicit need for IGMP messaging (nor any response to such messaging).

Can anyone point me in the right direction regarding why the socket never receives any data????

Thanks.
Andrew

hfclinux2:/home/root/UDP/apps/Crosser2# uname -a
Linux hfclinux2 2.6.15.1smp #6 SMP PREEMPT Mon Feb 13 11:38:32 EST 2006
i686 GNU/Linux
hfclinux2:/home/root/UDP/apps/Crosser2# tcpdump -i eth1 port 55300
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on eth1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
12:54:06.980000 IP 206.200.5.144.2232 > 224.0.17.44.55300: UDP, length 91
12:54:07.079675 IP 206.200.5.144.2232 > 224.0.17.44.55300: UDP, length 46
12:54:07.179869 IP 206.200.5.144.2232 > 224.0.17.44.55300: UDP, length 181
12:54:07.280437 IP 206.200.5.144.2232 > 224.0.17.44.55300: UDP, length 181
12:54:07.380005 IP 206.200.5.144.2232 > 224.0.17.44.55300: UDP, length 181
12:54:07.480073 IP 206.200.5.144.2232 > 224.0.17.44.55300: UDP, length 136
12:54:07.680459 IP 206.200.5.144.2232 > 224.0.17.44.55300: UDP, length 91
12:54:07.780277 IP 206.200.5.144.2232 > 224.0.17.44.55300: UDP, length 136
hfclinux2:/home/root/UDP/apps/Crosser2# ifconfig
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:11:43:DD:EB:2B
        inet addr:172.22.71.128  Bcast:172.22.71.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
        inet6 addr: fe80::211:43ff:fedd:eb2b/64 Scope:Link
        UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
        RX packets:19540 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
        TX packets:7838 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
        collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
        RX bytes:1563190 (1.4 MiB)  TX bytes:1943895 (1.8 MiB)
        Base address:0xdcc0 Memory:dfae0000-dfb00000

eth0:1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:43:DD:EB:2B

        inet addr:10.61.6.128  Bcast:10.61.6.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
        UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
        Base address:0xdcc0 Memory:dfae0000-dfb00000

eth0:2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:43:DD:EB:2B

        inet addr:196.0.34.11  Bcast:196.0.34.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
        UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
        Base address:0xdcc0 Memory:dfae0000-dfb00000

eth0:3 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:43:DD:EB:2B

        inet addr:192.168.254.128  Bcast:192.168.254.255

Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 Base address:0xdcc0 Memory:dfae0000-dfb00000

eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:43:DD:EB:2C

        inet addr:192.168.250.128  Bcast:192.168.250.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
        inet6 addr: fe80::211:43ff:fedd:eb2c/64 Scope:Link
        UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
        RX packets:137717 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
        TX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
        collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
        RX bytes:58314262 (55.6 MiB)  TX bytes:1596 (1.5 KiB)
        Base address:0xccc0 Memory:df8e0000-df900000

lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)

-------------------------
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>

using namespace std;

struct sockaddr_in localSock;
struct ip_mreqn group;

int                   sd;
int                   datalen;
char                  databuf[10];

int main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
sd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
if (sd < 0) {
perror("opening datagram socket");
exit(1);
}

{
int reuse=1;

if (setsockopt(sd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR,

                 (char *)&reuse, sizeof(reuse)) < 0) {
    perror("setting SO_REUSEADDR");
    close(sd);
    exit(1);

}
}

memset((char *) &localSock, 0, sizeof(localSock)); localSock.sin_family = AF_INET; localSock.sin_port = htons(55300);; localSock.sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY;

if (bind(sd, (struct sockaddr*)&localSock, sizeof(localSock))) {
perror("binding datagram socket");
close(sd);
exit(1);
}

group.imr_multiaddr.s_addr = inet_addr("224.0.17.44"); printf("%d\n",group.imr_multiaddr.s_addr); group.imr_address.s_addr = inet_addr("192.168.250.128"); if (setsockopt(sd, IPPROTO_IP, IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP,

               (char *)&group, sizeof(group)) < 0) {

perror("adding multicast group");
close(sd);
exit(1);
}
/*
* Read from the socket.
*/
datalen = sizeof(databuf);
if (recv(sd, databuf, datalen,0) < 0) {
perror("reading datagram message");
close(sd);
exit(1);
} else {
puts("success reading");
}
}

#1 lore raw

I've run your test program and it receives fine for me.

I note that the source address is not on the same subnet as (any of) the receiver's addresses. Are the packets being routed? The default multicasting TTL is 1, though I don't know if it'll be checked or dropped on the receiver, seeing as we aren't forwarding it.

Also, you might want to run "netstat -s" to see if any of the drop counters are being incremented (e.g., checksum error).

Finally, I'm assuming you don't have any firewall rules that are matching, right?

                                        +-DLS
#2 lore raw

David:

Thank you for taking the time to respond.

The packets are arriving via a switched network composed of Cisco devices in PIM dense mode. The packets pass through several switch hops, but no routing hops that have been documented to me. I did not think the source IP was relevant to the matching code in linux, since there are no source squelching socket options.

There are no firewall rules active on this machine, and the packets are definitely visible at the interface (see tcpdump output in my email).

I am going to try upgrading the kernel, and turning off the multicast router kernel options as a next step. But if you have any other ideas at all, I'm all ears.

This seems too much like Mr. Murphy's in the room.

A.

Quoted 21 lines · David Stevens

I've run your test program and it receives fine for me.

I note that the source address is not on the same subnet as (any of) the receiver's addresses. Are the packets being routed? The default multicasting TTL is 1, though I don't know if it'll be checked or dropped on the receiver, seeing as we aren't forwarding it.

Also, you might want to run "netstat -s" to see if any of the drop counters are being incremented (e.g., checksum error).

Finally, I'm assuming you don't have any firewall rules that are matching, right?

                                        +-DLS

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

#3 lore raw

Andrew,

Quoted 6 lines

I did not
think the source IP was relevant to the matching code in linux, since there are no source squelching socket options.

There are no firewall rules active on this machine, and the packets are definitely visible at the interface (see tcpdump output in my email).

The source address is not relevant (other than potentially
for firewall rules), and I understand from your original mail that they are arriving at the machine. The IP TTL is what I wanted to know there; but "netstat -s" will normally tell you why a packet was dropped, if it's arriving but not making it through the UDP/IP stack (as is your case).

Quoted 3 lines

I am going to try upgrading the kernel, and turning off the multicast router kernel options as a next step. But if you have any other ideas at all, I'm all ears.

"netstat -s" would be a good start. :-) tcpdump receiving a copy
of the packet does not mean UDP or IP won't drop it, but those drops are counted.

                                                        +-DLS