add-force-of-use-mmconfig.patch
PATCH 2/3 add-force-of-use-mmconfig.patch
This Patch add force for mmconfig. On Intel Macs the efi firmaware gives a different memory map then ACPI_MCFG provides. This makes the check wether to use mmconfig or not fail.
arch/i386/Kconfig +1 -0
@@ -1027,6 +1027,7 @@ default y config PCI_MMCONFIG + depends on DMI bool depends on PCI && ACPI && (PCI_GOMMCONFIG || PCI_GOANY) default y
arch/i386/pci/mmconfig.c +59 -7
84 lines not on this page · raw message
Quoted 3 lines · On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:28:14 +0200 Edgar Hucek <[email protected]> wrote:
This Patch add force for mmconfig. On Intel Macs the efi firmaware gives a different memory map then
ACPI_MCFGprovides. This makes the check wether to use mmconfig or not fail.
Sorry, you cannot do this. I already merged this patch into -mm, and followed that up with two bugfix patches, both of which you were copied on.
Now you're sending out the original patch, without the bugfixes which Adrian and I prepared.
If you think these patches should be merged into 2.6.18 at this late a stage, please give reasons and if they're agreeable I can send it all to Linus. But sending out known-buggy stuff which has already been fixed doesn't help anyone.
Also, please don't use filenames as patch descriptions. See section 2 of
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt.
Thanks.
Quoted 18 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 3 lines · On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:28:14 +0200 Edgar Hucek <[email protected]> wrote:
This Patch add force for mmconfig. On Intel Macs the efi firmaware gives a different memory map then
ACPI_MCFGprovides. This makes the check wether to use mmconfig or not fail.Sorry, you cannot do this. I already merged this patch into -mm, and followed that up with two bugfix patches, both of which you were copied on.
Now you're sending out the original patch, without the bugfixes which Adrian and I prepared.
If you think these patches should be merged into 2.6.18 at this late a stage, please give reasons and if they're agreeable I can send it all to Linus. But sending out known-buggy stuff which has already been fixed doesn't help anyone.
Quoted 5 lines
Also, please don't use filenames as patch descriptions. See section 2 of
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt.Thanks.
I see only one bugfix patch in your patches ( add-force-of-use-mmconfig-fix.patch ) which is now included in this patch.
cu
ED.
Quoted 19 lines · On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 07:26:15 +0200 Edgar Hucek <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 18 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 3 lines · On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:28:14 +0200 Edgar Hucek <[email protected]> wrote:
This Patch add force for mmconfig. On Intel Macs the efi firmaware gives a different memory map then
ACPI_MCFGprovides. This makes the check wether to use mmconfig or not fail.Sorry, you cannot do this. I already merged this patch into -mm, and followed that up with two bugfix patches, both of which you were copied on.
Now you're sending out the original patch, without the bugfixes which Adrian and I prepared.
If you think these patches should be merged into 2.6.18 at this late a stage, please give reasons and if they're agreeable I can send it all to Linus. But sending out known-buggy stuff which has already been fixed doesn't help anyone.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Also, please don't use filenames as patch descriptions. See section 2 of
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt.Thanks.
I see only one bugfix patch in your patches ( add-force-of-use-mmconfig-fix.patch ) which is now included in this patch.
I presently have
add-force-of-use-mmconfig.patch
add-force-of-use-mmconfig-fix.patch
add-force-of-use-mmconfig-fix-2.patch
and
add-efi-e820-memory-mapping-on-x86.patch
add-efi-e820-memory-mapping-on-x86-tidy.patch
add-efi-e820-memory-mapping-on-x86-fix.patch
add-efi-e820-memory-mapping-on-x86-fix-2.patch
all of which you should have been cc'ed on.
Anyway, unless there's a rush on this work, please check that everything looks OK in -mm as we head into 2.6.19-rc1.
Quoted 43 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 18 lines · On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 07:26:15 +0200 Edgar Hucek <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 17 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 3 lines · On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:28:14 +0200 Edgar Hucek <[email protected]> wrote:
This Patch add force for mmconfig. On Intel Macs the efi firmaware gives a different memory map then
ACPI_MCFGprovides. This makes the check wether to use mmconfig or not fail.Sorry, you cannot do this. I already merged this patch into -mm, and followed that up with two bugfix patches, both of which you were copied on.
Now you're sending out the original patch, without the bugfixes which Adrian and I prepared.
If you think these patches should be merged into 2.6.18 at this late a stage, please give reasons and if they're agreeable I can send it all to Linus. But sending out known-buggy stuff which has already been fixed doesn't help anyone.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Also, please don't use filenames as patch descriptions. See section 2 of
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt.Thanks.
I see only one bugfix patch in your patches ( add-force-of-use-mmconfig-fix.patch ) which is now included in this patch.
I presently have
add-force-of-use-mmconfig.patch
add-force-of-use-mmconfig-fix.patch
add-force-of-use-mmconfig-fix-2.patchand
add-efi-e820-memory-mapping-on-x86.patch
add-efi-e820-memory-mapping-on-x86-tidy.patch
add-efi-e820-memory-mapping-on-x86-fix.patch
add-efi-e820-memory-mapping-on-x86-fix-2.patch
Quoted 5 lines
all of which you should have been cc'ed on.
Anyway, unless there's a rush on this work, please check that everything looks OK in -mm as we head into 2.6.19-rc1.
Mea culpa. Looked at the wrong place. I checked the patches in mm and they look ok.
cu
Edgar Hucek