move IMMUTABLE|APPEND checks to notify_change()
PATCH 1/1 move IMMUTABLE|APPEND checks to notify_change()
[PATCH] move IMMUTABLE|APPEND checks to notify_change()
This patch moves lots of IMMUTABLE and APPEND flag checks scattered all around to more logical place in notify_change().
fs/attr.c renamed from fs/attr.c.immut +0 -0
@@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ int notify_change(struct dentry * dentry
struct timespec now; unsigned int ia_valid = attr->ia_valid;
+ if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode) || IS_APPEND(inode))
+ return -EPERM;
+
mode = inode->i_mode; now = current_fs_time(inode->i_sb);
fs/open.c renamed from fs/open.c.immut +0 -0
@@ -252,10 +252,6 @@ static long do_sys_truncate(const char _
if (IS_RDONLY(inode)) goto dput_and_out;
- error = -EPERM;
- if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode) || IS_APPEND(inode))
- goto dput_and_out;
-
/* * Make sure that there are no leases. */ @@ -316,10 +312,6 @@ static long do_sys_ftruncate(unsigned in if (small && length > MAX_NON_LFS) goto out_putf;
- error = -EPERM;
- if (IS_APPEND(inode))
- goto out_putf;
-
error = locks_verify_truncate(inode, file, length);
if (!error)
error = do_truncate(dentry, length, ATTR_MTIME|ATTR_CTIME, file);
@@ -385,10 +377,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys_utime(char __user *
/* Don't worry, the checks are done in inode_change_ok() */
newattrs.ia_valid = ATTR_CTIME | ATTR_MTIME | ATTR_ATIME;
if (times) {- error = -EPERM;
- if (IS_APPEND(inode) || IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
- goto dput_and_out;
-
error = get_user(newattrs.ia_atime.tv_sec, ×->actime); newattrs.ia_atime.tv_nsec = 0; if (!error) @@ -398,15 +386,9 @@ asmlinkage long sys_utime(char __user * goto dput_and_out; newattrs.ia_valid |= ATTR_ATIME_SET | ATTR_MTIME_SET;
- } else {
- error = -EACCES;
- if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
- goto dput_and_out;
-
- if (current->fsuid != inode->i_uid &&
+ } else if (current->fsuid != inode->i_uid &&
(error = vfs_permission(&nd, MAY_WRITE)) != 0)
- goto dput_and_out;
- }
+ goto dput_and_out;
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
error = notify_change(nd.dentry, &newattrs);
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
@@ -442,24 +424,14 @@ long do_utimes(int dfd, char __user *fil
/* Don't worry, the checks are done in inode_change_ok() */
newattrs.ia_valid = ATTR_CTIME | ATTR_MTIME | ATTR_ATIME;
if (times) {- error = -EPERM;
- if (IS_APPEND(inode) || IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
- goto dput_and_out;
-
newattrs.ia_atime.tv_sec = times[0].tv_sec; newattrs.ia_atime.tv_nsec = times[0].tv_usec * 1000; newattrs.ia_mtime.tv_sec = times[1].tv_sec; newattrs.ia_mtime.tv_nsec = times[1].tv_usec * 1000; newattrs.ia_valid |= ATTR_ATIME_SET | ATTR_MTIME_SET;
- } else {
- error = -EACCES;
- if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
- goto dput_and_out;
-
- if (current->fsuid != inode->i_uid &&
+ } else if (current->fsuid != inode->i_uid &&
(error = vfs_permission(&nd, MAY_WRITE)) != 0) - goto dput_and_out; - } + goto dput_and_out; mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex); error = notify_change(nd.dentry, &newattrs); mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex); @@ -638,9 +610,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys_fchmod(unsigned int err = -EROFS; if (IS_RDONLY(inode)) goto out_putf; - err = -EPERM; - if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode) || IS_APPEND(inode)) - goto out_putf; mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex); if (mode == (mode_t) -1) mode = inode->i_mode; @@ -672,10 +641,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys_fchmodat(int dfd, co if (IS_RDONLY(inode)) goto dput_and_out;
- error = -EPERM;
- if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode) || IS_APPEND(inode))
- goto dput_and_out;
-
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
if (mode == (mode_t) -1)
mode = inode->i_mode;
@@ -709,9 +674,6 @@ static int chown_common(struct dentry *
error = -EROFS;
if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
goto out;
- error = -EPERM;
- if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode) || IS_APPEND(inode))
- goto out;
newattrs.ia_valid = ATTR_CTIME;
if (user != (uid_t) -1) {
newattrs.ia_valid |= ATTR_UID;Quoted 4 lines · Kirill Korotaev
[PATCH] move IMMUTABLE|APPEND checks to
notify_change()This patch moves lots of IMMUTABLE and APPEND flag checks scattered all around to more logical place in
notify_change().
NAK. For example, you are allowed to do unames(file, NULL) on any file you own or can write to, whether it's append-only or not. With your change that gets -EPERM.
Do you meant utimes(file, NULL)?
But is it correct behaviour? Why then do you get -EPERM on utimes(file, smth) if the file is append-only? And why do you get -EACCESS on utimes(file, NULL), if this file is immutable?
Could you explain, why is it done so?
Quoted 9 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 4 lines · Kirill Korotaev
[PATCH] move IMMUTABLE|APPEND checks to
notify_change()This patch moves lots of IMMUTABLE and APPEND flag checks scattered all around to more logical place in
notify_change().NAK. For example, you are allowed to do
unames(file, NULL)on any file you own or can write to, whether it's append-only or not. With your change that gets-EPERM.
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks, Dmitry.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
[PATCH] move IMMUTABLE|APPEND checks to
notify_change()This patch moves lots of IMMUTABLE and APPEND flag checks scattered all around to more logical place in
notify_change().NAK. For example, you are allowed to do
unames(file, NULL)on any file you own or can write to, whether it's append-only or not. With your change that gets-EPERM.
Al, will you ACK the patch allowing to set current times in notify_change() for APPEND files?
However, I'd like to see an explanation on dim@'s question why semantics are different and current time is allowed to be set, while arbitrary time is not.
Kirill
Quoted 4 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 2 lines · Kirill Korotaev
[PATCH] move IMMUTABLE|APPEND checks to
notify_change()
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
This patch moves lots of IMMUTABLE and APPEND flag checks scattered all around to more logical place in
notify_change().NAK. For example, you are allowed to do
unames(file, NULL)on any file you own or can write to, whether it's append-only or not. With your change that gets-EPERM.
Does such check in notify_change() looks better for you?
notify_change():
if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
return -EPERM;
if (IS_APPEND(inode) &&
(ia_valid & ~(ATTR_CTIME | ATTR_MTIME | ATTR_ATIME)))
return -EPERM;Thanks,
Kirill
Quoted 6 lines · Dmitry Mishin
Do you meant
utimes(file, NULL)?
But is it correct behaviour? Why then do you get-EPERMonutimes(file, smth)if the file is append-only? And why do you get-EACCESSonutimes(file, NULL), if this file is immutable?Could you explain, why is it done so?
RTFPOSIX...
Short version:
* immutable files are immutable, including metadata
* append-only files may be touched (when you write to the end), which
means that you can touch them. Which is what utimes(file, NULL) does.
* you can not truncate append-only file, overwrite already written
data or set timestamps to arbitrary values.
That's where the difference between utimes(file, NULL) and utimes(file, p) is - the former basically is a write-without-write ("touch foo") and the latter directly assigns to timestamps. Permissions needed for these are obviously different.
Please, read POSIX/SuS when modifying behaviour of syscalls. Really.