Skip to contentSkip to conversation

raid5 reshape bug with XFS

DISCUSSION Bill Cizek 2 participants 4 messages Nov 5, 2006 – Nov 7, 2006 MD RAID

lore
Share & tools
lore

Bill Cizek

author
#0 lore raw

Hi,

I'm setting up a raid 5 system and I ran across a bug when reshaping an array with a mounted XFS filesystem on it. This is under linux 2.6.18.2 and mdadm 2.5.5

I have a test array with 3 10 GB disks and a fourth 10 GB spare disk, and a mounted xfs filesystem on it:

root@localhost $ mdadm --detail /dev/md4 /dev/md4:

       Version : 00.90.03

Creation Time : Sat Nov 4 18:58:59 2006
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 20964480 (19.99 GiB 21.47 GB)
Device Size : 10482240 (10.00 GiB 10.73 GB)
Raid Devices : 3
Total Devices : 4
Preferred Minor : 4
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
[snip]
------------------------------------
...I Grow it:

root@localhost $ mdadm -G /dev/md4 -n4
mdadm: Need to backup 384K of critical section..
mdadm: ... critical section passed. root@localhost $ mdadm --detail /dev/md4 /dev/md4:

       Version : 00.91.03

Creation Time : Sat Nov 4 18:58:59 2006
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 20964480 (19.99 GiB 21.47 GB)
Device Size : 10482240 (10.00 GiB 10.73 GB)
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 4
Preferred Minor : 4
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
-----------------------------------

It goes along and reshapes fine (from /proc/mdstat):

md4 : active raid5 dm-67[3] dm-66[2] dm-65[1] dm-64[0]

     20964480 blocks super 0.91 level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] 
[UUUU]
     [====>................]  reshape = 22.0% (2314624/10482240) 

finish=16.7min
speed=8128K/sec

------------------------------------

When the reshape completes, the full array size gets corrupted:
/proc/mdstat:
md4 : active raid5 dm-67[3] dm-66[2] dm-65[1] dm-64[0]

     31446720 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UUUU]

- looks good, but-

root@localhost $ mdadm --detail /dev/md4 /dev/md4:

       Version : 00.90.03

Creation Time : Sat Nov 4 18:58:59 2006
Raid Level : raid5

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
   Array Size : 2086592 (2038.03 MiB 2136.67 MB)

Device Size : 10482240 (10.00 GiB 10.73 GB)
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 4
Preferred Minor : 4
Persistence : Superblock is persistent

(2086592 != 31446720 -- Bad, much too small)

---------------------------------
xfs_growfs /dev/md4 barfs horribly - something about reading past the end of the device.

If I unmount the XFS filesystem, things work ok:

root@localhost $ umount /dev/md4

root@localhost $ mdadm --detail /dev/md4 /dev/md4:

       Version : 00.90.03

Creation Time : Sat Nov 4 18:58:59 2006
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 31446720 (29.99 GiB 32.20 GB)
Device Size : 10482240 (10.00 GiB 10.73 GB)
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 4
Preferred Minor : 4
Persistence : Superblock is persistent

(31446720 == 31446720 -- Good)

If I remount the fs, I can use xfs_growfs with no ill effects.

It's a pretty easy work-around to not have the fs mounted during the resize, but it doesn't seem right for the array size to get borked like this. If there's anything I can provide to debug this let me know.

Thanks,
Bill

#1 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · On Saturday November 4, [email protected] wrote:

Hi,

I'm setting up a raid 5 system and I ran across a bug when reshaping an array with a mounted XFS filesystem on it. This is under linux 2.6.18.2 and mdadm 2.5.5

...

Quoted 8 lines

root@localhost $ mdadm --detail /dev/md4
/dev/md4:

        Version : 00.90.03

Creation Time : Sat Nov 4 18:58:59 2006
Raid Level : raid5

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
   Array Size : 2086592 (2038.03 MiB 2136.67 MB)
Quoted 7 lines
    Device Size : 10482240 (10.00 GiB 10.73 GB)

Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 4
Preferred Minor : 4
Persistence : Superblock is persistent

(2086592 != 31446720 -- Bad, much too small)

You have CONFIG_LBD=n don't you?

Thanks for the report. This should fix it. Please let me know if it does.

NeilBrown

### Diffstat output

 ./drivers/md/raid5.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/md/raid5.c +1 -1
diff .prev/drivers/md/raid5.c ./drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -3909,7 +3909,7 @@ static void end_reshape(raid5_conf_t *co
 		bdev = bdget_disk(conf->mddev->gendisk, 0);
 		if (bdev) {
 			mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_inode->i_mutex);
-			i_size_write(bdev->bd_inode, conf->mddev->array_size << 10);
+			i_size_write(bdev->bd_inode, (loff_t)conf->mddev->array_size << 10);
 			mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_inode->i_mutex);
 			bdput(bdev);
 		}
author
#2 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Neil Brown
Quoted 3 lines · On Saturday November 4, [email protected] wrote:

Hi,

I'm setting up a raid 5 system and I ran across a bug when reshaping an array with a mounted XFS filesystem on it. This is under linux 2.6.18.2 and mdadm 2.5.5

You have CONFIG_LBD=n don't you?

Yes,

I have CONFIG_LBD=n

...and the patch fixed the problem.

Side Note: I just converted 2 raid0 drives into a 4 drive raid5 array in-place, with relative ease. I couldn't have done it without the work you (and I'm sure others) have done. Thanks.

-Bill

#3 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · On Sunday November 5, [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 7 lines · Neil Brown
Quoted 5 lines · On Saturday November 4, [email protected] wrote:

Hi,

I'm setting up a raid 5 system and I ran across a bug when reshaping an array with a mounted XFS filesystem on it. This is under linux 2.6.18.2 and mdadm 2.5.5

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines

You have CONFIG_LBD=n don't you?

Yes,

I have CONFIG_LBD=n

...and the patch fixed the problem.

Cool thanks.

Quoted 5 lines

Side Note: I just converted 2 raid0 drives into a 4 drive raid5 array in-place, with relative ease.
I couldn't have done it without the work you (and I'm sure others) have done. Thanks.

And without bug reports like yours others would have more problems.

Thanks.
NeilBrown