Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Ext4 devel interlock meeting minutes (March 14, 2007)

DISCUSSION Avantika Mathur 3 participants 3 messages Mar 14, 2007 – Mar 16, 2007

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Ext4 Developer Interlock Call: 03/14/2007 Meeting Minutes

Attendees: Mingming Cao, Eric Sandeen, Ted Ts'o, Dave Kleikamp, Suparna Bhattacharya, Takashi Sato, Avantika Mathur

Minutes can be accessed at: http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext4_Developer%27s_Conference_Call

Ext4 git Tree:

- Shaggy and Eric fixed the recent problems with the nanosecond timestamps in the git tree

- There is a general problem that the git tree is not updated frequently

- Ted feels there is not enough testing done to feel comfortable updating to a new release

-- Many of the patches added to the tree are not tested properly.
-- It would be helpful if people could pick up the tree and test it, and make sure all upstream merging criteria is met by ext4 developers.

- Currently looking at methods of automating testing of each new git tree release on different architectures and benchmarks.

- Slow code review is also slowing down ext4.

- Ted suggested maintaining a git tree that tracks the patch queue, so there can be multiple people working on the patch queue.
- When patches are stable, update the central git tree that can then be pushed upstream.

- Ted will start a second git tree, and initially put Shaggy and Mingming as additional users who can access the tree.

OLS:

- The Ext4 OLS Paper was accepted.

- Avantika presented the basic outline for the paper, Suparna had comments on the layout

- Rather than grouping features based on time (when they are going to be included), group them based on classification,
- i.e. scalability, block placement, new features.

- This way the paper can be used as a reference for people who want to learn about ext4

- Avantika will update the outline and send out a new version

- In the 2005 OLS ext3 paper, benchmarks tio dbench and filemark were used.
- Looking into different benchmarks to use in this paper.
- Eric suggested looking at CPU utilization test used by David Chinner in his XFS OLS paper last year.

Preallocation:

- Amit has been working on implementing the fallocate systemn call

- he was struggling with the mode bit and implementation on different architectures.

- Having difficulty in how to order the parameters on s390 architecture

- Suparna will ask Amit to post his current patches, so other can begin reviewing and helping out.

i_version Patches:

- the high 32 bit of the i_version field is still required to support the full 64 bit i_version number NFSv4 requires

- The general consensus on the call was to use the i_extra_isize in the inode for the high 32 bits.

- This would keep i_version completely separated from ctime

#1 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Avantika Mathur

Ext4 Developer Interlock Call: 03/14/2007 Meeting Minutes

Attendees: Mingming Cao, Eric Sandeen, Ted Ts'o, Dave Kleikamp, Suparna Bhattacharya, Takashi Sato, Avantika Mathur

Minutes can be accessed at: http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext4_Developer%27s_Conference_Call

just a little typo about the date of the conference on the wiki page, you could fix that next time~

mingming

Quoted 68 lines

Ext4 git Tree:

- Shaggy and Eric fixed the recent problems with the nanosecond timestamps in the git tree

- There is a general problem that the git tree is not updated frequently

- Ted feels there is not enough testing done to feel comfortable updating to a new release

-- Many of the patches added to the tree are not tested properly.
-- It would be helpful if people could pick up the tree and test it, and make sure all upstream merging criteria is met by ext4 developers.

- Currently looking at methods of automating testing of each new git tree release on different architectures and benchmarks.

- Slow code review is also slowing down ext4.

- Ted suggested maintaining a git tree that tracks the patch queue, so there can be multiple people working on the patch queue.
- When patches are stable, update the central git tree that can then be pushed upstream.

- Ted will start a second git tree, and initially put Shaggy and Mingming as additional users who can access the tree.

OLS:

- The Ext4 OLS Paper was accepted.

- Avantika presented the basic outline for the paper, Suparna had comments on the layout

- Rather than grouping features based on time (when they are going to be included), group them based on classification,
- i.e. scalability, block placement, new features.

- This way the paper can be used as a reference for people who want to learn about ext4

- Avantika will update the outline and send out a new version

- In the 2005 OLS ext3 paper, benchmarks tio dbench and filemark were used.
- Looking into different benchmarks to use in this paper.
- Eric suggested looking at CPU utilization test used by David Chinner in his XFS OLS paper last year.

Preallocation:

- Amit has been working on implementing the fallocate systemn call

- he was struggling with the mode bit and implementation on different architectures.

- Having difficulty in how to order the parameters on s390 architecture

- Suparna will ask Amit to post his current patches, so other can begin reviewing and helping out.

i_version Patches:

- the high 32 bit of the i_version field is still required to support the full 64 bit i_version number NFSv4 requires

- The general consensus on the call was to use the i_extra_isize in the inode for the high 32 bits.

- This would keep i_version completely separated from ctime

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

#2 lore raw
In reply to Avantika Mathur
Quoted 18 lines · On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:49:39 -0700 Avantika Mathur wrote:

Ext4 Developer Interlock Call: 03/14/2007 Meeting Minutes

Attendees: Mingming Cao, Eric Sandeen, Ted Ts'o, Dave Kleikamp, Suparna Bhattacharya, Takashi Sato, Avantika Mathur

Minutes can be accessed at: http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext4_Developer%27s_Conference_Call

Ext4 git Tree:

- Shaggy and Eric fixed the recent problems with the nanosecond timestamps in the git tree

- There is a general problem that the git tree is not updated frequently

- Ted feels there is not enough testing done to feel comfortable updating to a new release

-- Many of the patches added to the tree are not tested properly.
-- It would be helpful if people could pick up the tree and test it, and make sure all upstream merging criteria is met by ext4 developers.

Quoted 8 lines

- Currently looking at methods of automating testing of each new git tree release on different architectures and benchmarks.

- Slow code review is also slowing down ext4.

- Ted suggested maintaining a git tree that tracks the patch queue, so there can be multiple people working on the patch queue.
- When patches are stable, update the central git tree that can then be pushed upstream.

- Ted will start a second git tree, and initially put Shaggy and Mingming as additional users who can access the tree.

Hi,
What's the purpose of this second git tree, please?

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***