debugfs fill_bgs command?
I was wondering if others think it would be useful to have a "fill_bgs" command in debugfs; this would (minimally) mark the lower X bgs as full for both inodes & blocks (possibly either/or), to allow testing the higher block groups. I'm using a hacked up version of this to do a little ext3 testing above 8T. Given that this would really only be a testing option in nature, would it be accepted into e2fsprogs? I'd probably need some sort of "unfill" command as well, to put the bg counters back where they should be; probably by actually reading the bitmaps. This way fsck would still find a consistent filesystem...
I had originally written a set_bg_field function too, to go with inode & sb variants, though for marking the first few thousand bg's it was going to get a bit tedious... :)
Thoughts?
Thanks,
-Eric
Quoted 10 lines · Eric Sandeen
I was wondering if others think it would be useful to have a "
fill_bgs" command in debugfs; this would (minimally) mark the lower X bgs as full for both inodes & blocks (possibly either/or), to allow testing the higher block groups. I'm using a hacked up version of this to do a little ext3 testing above 8T. Given that this would really only be a testing option in nature, would it be accepted into e2fsprogs? I'd probably need some sort of "unfill" command as well, to put the bg counters back where they should be; probably by actually reading the bitmaps. This way fsck would still find a consistent filesystem...
Quoted 3 lines
I had originally written a
set_bg_fieldfunction too, to go with inode & sb variants, though for marking the first few thousand bg's it was going to get a bit tedious... :)
Try "mke2fs -O lazy_bg XXX" and be happy. Can be used on any kernel as it is a COMPAT feature and marks all but first and last groups as full.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
Quoted 2 lines · Andreas Dilger
Try "mke2fs -O
lazy_bgXXX" and be happy. Can be used on any kernel as it is a COMPAT feature and marks all but first and last groups as full.
Ugh, how'd I miss that. :)
Thanks...
-Eric