Testing todays u-boot-fdt
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 4 lines · In message <[email protected]> you wrote:
...and there's the irony. With it as a library included by BOARDLIBS in the board config file, it is only compiled if it is called for in the board's config.mk.
Yes, I am aware of this.
Quoted 4 lines
It seems like it would be overall a win to have more of a real library approach. I have not gone down that path hardly at all, however, and it is likely to have briers that I'm not aware of. It also would take time. :-/
But "more of a real library approach" still means that you *always* build the library, but some mechanism selects which files get compiled and archived in the libs.
Quoted 4 lines
Having said that, I don't have any real issue in applying wg's patch. It isn't a big deal and will match the rest of u-boot methodology. At the end of the day, it is a lot easier than converting everything to true libraries. ;-]
Right :-(
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Signature · 4 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich, CEO: Wolfgang Denk Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de In C we had to code our own bugs, in C++ we can inherit them.