Performance comparaison with dbench on KVM
Hi,
I made some benchmarks with dbench on linux/KVM.
IDE means I use an image disk with "-hda"
SCSI means I use an image disk with "-sda"
(see the patch I proposed on qemu list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg08679.html )
threads KVM-21 KVM-21 KVM-24 KVM-24 KVM-25 KVM-25
IDE SCSI IDE SCSI IDE SCSI1 215.272 94.8775 318.626 319.533 307.111 331.757 2 212.061 91.3193 313.217 315.163 314.577 323.715 4 197.586 81.7551 291.752 276.044 292.084 271.191 8 144.814 58.5725 188.819 198.995 168.273 165.564 16 111.505 66.3605 139.824 157.617 150.822 123.671 32 43.4109 15.7386 48.2109 50.4114 59.1074 69.5717 64 21.0567 8.3535 11.3457 19.9483 20.4877 24.5627
results are in MB/sec
Conclusion:
KVM-25 is really better than KVM-21
in most cases, SCSI is better than IDE
Cheers,
Laurent
Signature · 3 lines
------------- Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/[email protected] -------------- "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
Quoted 20 lines · Laurent Vivier
Hi,
I made some benchmarks with dbench on linux/KVM.
IDE means I use an image disk with "-hda"
SCSI means I use an image disk with "-sda"
(see the patch I proposed on qemu list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg08679.html )threads KVM-21 KVM-21 KVM-24 KVM-24 KVM-25 KVM-25 IDE SCSI IDE SCSI IDE SCSI1 215.272 94.8775 318.626 319.533 307.111 331.757 2 212.061 91.3193 313.217 315.163 314.577 323.715 4 197.586 81.7551 291.752 276.044 292.084 271.191 8 144.814 58.5725 188.819 198.995 168.273 165.564 16 111.505 66.3605 139.824 157.617 150.822 123.671 32 43.4109 15.7386 48.2109 50.4114 59.1074 69.5717 64 21.0567 8.3535 11.3457 19.9483 20.4877 24.5627
Quoted 7 lines
results are in MB/sec
Conclusion:
KVM-25 is really better than KVM-21
in most cases, SCSI is better than IDE
Were you using libposix-aio? If not, did you change the aio_init function in block-raw.c (assuming that you're using a raw disk). Otherwise, QEMU by default will limit the glibc aio library to a single thread so you won't see a lot of the benefits of SCSI emulation.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Quoted 12 lines
Cheers,
Laurent------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quoted 5 lines
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
Quoted 25 lines · Anthony Liguori
Quoted 24 lines · Laurent Vivier
Hi,
I made some benchmarks with dbench on linux/KVM.
IDE means I use an image disk with "-hda"
SCSI means I use an image disk with "-sda"
(see the patch I proposed on qemu list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg08679.html )threads KVM-21 KVM-21 KVM-24 KVM-24 KVM-25 KVM-25 IDE SCSI IDE SCSI IDE SCSI1 215.272 94.8775 318.626 319.533 307.111 331.757 2 212.061 91.3193 313.217 315.163 314.577 323.715 4 197.586 81.7551 291.752 276.044 292.084 271.191 8 144.814 58.5725 188.819 198.995 168.273 165.564 16 111.505 66.3605 139.824 157.617 150.822 123.671 32 43.4109 15.7386 48.2109 50.4114 59.1074 69.5717 64 21.0567 8.3535 11.3457 19.9483 20.4877 24.5627results are in MB/sec
Conclusion:
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
KVM-25 is really better than KVM-21
in most cases, SCSI is better than IDEWere you using libposix-aio? If not, did you change the
aio_initfunction inblock-raw.c(assuming that you're using a raw disk). Otherwise, QEMU by default will limit the glibc aio library to a single thread so you won't see a lot of the benefits of SCSI emulation.
Hi Anthony,
I didn't modify aio_init limit...
I made some benchmarks with liposix-aio, but results are worst with IDE and crashes with SCSI (because I need to make some additional works).
It's the part on which I work now (to align buffers to avoid redundant buffer copy and open image disk with O_DIRECT).
Regards,
Laurent
Signature · 3 lines
------------- Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/[email protected] -------------- "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
Quoted 6 lines · Laurent Vivier
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hi Anthony,
I didn't modify
aio_initlimit...
It would be pretty useful to give it a try. In qemu_aio_init() where aio_init() get's called. If you just bump aio_threads and aio_num from 1 to, say, 32. You should see a big difference in SCSI performance.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Quoted 10 lines
I made some benchmarks with liposix-aio, but results are worst with IDE and crashes with SCSI (because I need to make some additional works).
It's the part on which I work now (to align buffers to avoid redundant buffer copy and open image disk with
O_DIRECT).Regards,
Laurent
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
Quoted 11 lines · Anthony Liguori
Quoted 5 lines · Laurent Vivier
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hi Anthony,I didn't modify
aio_initlimit...It would be pretty useful to give it a try. In
qemu_aio_init()whereaio_init()get's called. If you just bumpaio_threadsandaio_numfrom 1 to, say, 32. You should see a big difference in SCSI performance.
I made some tests as you explained, but results are worst.
with:
ai.aio_threads = 32;
ai.aio_num = 32;I have:
KVM-25 + SCSI + aio_init(32 threads)
Throughput 332.305 MB/sec 1 procs
Throughput 316.832 MB/sec 2 procs
Throughput 246.741 MB/sec 4 procs
Throughput 142.115 MB/sec 8 procs
Throughput 107.227 MB/sec 16 procs
Throughput 54.6614 MB/sec 32 proc
Throughput 21.3738 MB/sec 64 procs
Laurent
Signature · 3 lines
------------- Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/[email protected] -------------- "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel