Online defragmentation
Hi Takashi,
I was looking at online defrag code and found that the tmp_inode is created with tmp_inode->i_nlink equal to zero. Now i am not sure whether i understand the code correctly, but AFAIU we allocate contiguous block using this tmp_inode. That means tmp_inode have extent details corresponding to the blocks. Now we are mapping the file data found in the original inode to this new blocks. Towards the end we does a iput. In iput since we have i_nlink as zero it will go ahead and call generic_delete_inode which will cause these data blocks to be marked free (right ?)
I haven't tested the defrag code. This came up when i was doing the online migration. With large file having large number of fragmented blocks I was getting the below error during the iput of the temporary inode.
"ext4_free_blocks Freeing blocks not in datazone ...."
I was able to fix that by setting i_nlink = 1 which will cause the generic_forget_inode to be called
-aneesh
Quoted 4 lines · Aneesh Kumar K.V
Hi Takashi,
I was looking at online defrag code and found that the
tmp_inodeis created withtmp_inode->i_nlinkequal to zero. Now i am not sure whether i understand the code correctly, but AFAIU we allocate contiguous block using thistmp_inode. That meanstmp_inodehave extent details corresponding to the blocks. Now we are mapping the file data found in the original inode to this new blocks. Towards the end we does a iput. In iput since we havei_nlinkas zero it will go ahead and callgeneric_delete_inodewhich will cause these data blocks to be marked free (right ?)
Looking at the code again i guess for defragmentation it is okey. I guess what actually happens is the blocks that is corresponding to the original inode get accounted under tmp_inode. (it actually does a swap of blocks ) So doing a iput with i_nlink = 0 is the correct approach.
Correct me if i am wrong.
Sorry for the noise.
-aneesh
Hi,
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I was looking at online defrag code and found that the
tmp_inodeis created withtmp_inode->i_nlinkequal to zero. Now i am not sure whether i understand the code correctly, but AFAIU we allocate contiguous block using thistmp_inode. That meanstmp_inodehave extent details corresponding to the blocks. Now we are mapping the file data found in the original inode to this new blocks. Towards the end we does a iput. In iput since we havei_nlinkas zero it will go ahead and callgeneric_delete_inodewhich will cause these data blocks to be marked free (right ?)Looking at the code again i guess for defragmentation it is okey. I guess what actually happens is the blocks that is corresponding to the original inode get accounted under
tmp_inode. (it actually does a swap of blocks ) So doing a iput withi_nlink= 0 is the correct approach.Correct me if i am wrong.
Your understanding is right.
The iput() is called to free the old blocks which were in the original inode.
Cheers, Takashi
Quoted 6 lines · Aneesh Kumar K.V
I haven't tested the defrag code. This came up when i was doing the online migration. With large file having large number of fragmented blocks I was getting the below error during the iput of the temporary inode.
"
ext4_free_blocksFreeing blocks not in datazone ...."
This shouldn't happen regardless of whether you are doing defrag or not, since it will cause the filesystem to go read-only.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.