Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Online defragmentation

DISCUSSION Aneesh Kumar K.V 3 participants 4 messages May 30, 2007 – May 31, 2007

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi Takashi,

I was looking at online defrag code and found that the tmp_inode is created with tmp_inode->i_nlink equal to zero. Now i am not sure whether i understand the code correctly, but AFAIU we allocate contiguous block using this tmp_inode. That means tmp_inode have extent details corresponding to the blocks. Now we are mapping the file data found in the original inode to this new blocks. Towards the end we does a iput. In iput since we have i_nlink as zero it will go ahead and call generic_delete_inode which will cause these data blocks to be marked free (right ?)

I haven't tested the defrag code. This came up when i was doing the online migration. With large file having large number of fragmented blocks I was getting the below error during the iput of the temporary inode.

"ext4_free_blocks Freeing blocks not in datazone ...."

I was able to fix that by setting i_nlink = 1 which will cause the generic_forget_inode to be called

-aneesh

#1 lore raw
Quoted 4 lines · Aneesh Kumar K.V

Hi Takashi,

I was looking at online defrag code and found that the tmp_inode is created with tmp_inode->i_nlink equal to zero. Now i am not sure whether i understand the code correctly, but AFAIU we allocate contiguous block using this tmp_inode. That means tmp_inode have extent details corresponding to the blocks. Now we are mapping the file data found in the original inode to this new blocks. Towards the end we does a iput. In iput since we have i_nlink as zero it will go ahead and call generic_delete_inode which will cause these data blocks to be marked free (right ?)

Looking at the code again i guess for defragmentation it is okey. I guess what actually happens is the blocks that is corresponding to the original inode get accounted under tmp_inode. (it actually does a swap of blocks ) So doing a iput with i_nlink = 0 is the correct approach.

Correct me if i am wrong.

Sorry for the noise.

-aneesh

#2 lore raw

Hi,

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines

I was looking at online defrag code and found that the tmp_inode is created with tmp_inode->i_nlink equal to zero. Now i am not sure whether i understand the code correctly, but AFAIU we allocate contiguous block using this tmp_inode. That means tmp_inode have extent details corresponding to the blocks. Now we are mapping the file data found in the original inode to this new blocks. Towards the end we does a iput. In iput since we have i_nlink as zero it will go ahead and call generic_delete_inode which will cause these data blocks to be marked free (right ?)

Looking at the code again i guess for defragmentation it is okey. I guess what actually happens is the blocks that is corresponding to the original inode get accounted under tmp_inode. (it actually does a swap of blocks ) So doing a iput with i_nlink = 0 is the correct approach.

Correct me if i am wrong.

Your understanding is right.
The iput() is called to free the old blocks which were in the original inode.

Cheers, Takashi

#3 lore raw
In reply to Aneesh Kumar K.V
Quoted 6 lines · Aneesh Kumar K.V

I haven't tested the defrag code. This came up when i was doing the online migration. With large file having large number of fragmented blocks I was getting the below error during the iput of the temporary inode.

"ext4_free_blocks Freeing blocks not in datazone ...."

This shouldn't happen regardless of whether you are doing defrag or not, since it will cause the filesystem to go read-only.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.