2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v2
PATCH 1/3 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v2
Hi all,
Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc4.
Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc.
http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions
Unclassified
Subject : nanosleep(0) behaviour
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/27/108
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/4/239
Submitter : Maximilian Engelhardt <[email protected]>
Michael Buesch <[email protected]> Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Status : problem is being debugged
Subject : Kernel hang on CMOS_READ
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/3/138
Submitter : Rodrigo Luiz <[email protected]>
Status : Unknown
Subject : Device hang when offlining a CPU due to IRQ misrouting
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/31/419
Submitter : Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
Status : problem is being debugged
Subject : long freezes on thinkpad t60
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/24/100
Submitter : Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
Status : problem is being debugged
Regards,
Michal
--
"Najbardziej brakowało mi twojego milczenia." -- Andrzej Sapkowski "Coś więcej"
Quoted 8 lines · Michal Piotrowski
Subject : nanosleep(0) behaviour
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/27/108http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/4/239Submitter : Maximilian Engelhardt <[email protected]>
Handled-By Gary Zambrano <[email protected]>Michael Buesch <[email protected]>
Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Status : problem is being debugged
Please remove this. The behavior is correct and it just affects buggy applications like iperf, which used usleep(0) as a yield. iperf is fixed by now.
tglx
Hi!
Can we add 'writing to /proc/acpi/thermal/*/trip_points' no longer works to the list? Len did it intentionally but that does not make it right. People are using it and we did not go through deprecation period. Plus there's no reasonable alternative.
Pavel
Signature · 2 lines
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Quoted 4 lines · On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:02:22 +0000 Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi!
Can we add 'writing to
/proc/acpi/thermal/*/trip_points' no longer works to the list?
I thought we had.
Quoted 3 lines
Len did it intentionally but that does not make it right. People are using it and we did not go through deprecation period. Plus there's no reasonable alternative.
Was that writeability causing any actual problems in 2.6.21?
Andrew Morton pisze:
Quoted 8 lines · On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:02:22 +0000 Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 5 lines
Hi!
Can we add 'writing to
/proc/acpi/thermal/*/trip_points' no longer works to the list?I thought we had.
Len rejected this bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8495
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Len did it intentionally but that does not make it right. People are using it and we did not go through deprecation period. Plus there's no reasonable alternative.
Was that writeability causing any actual problems in 2.6.21?
Regards,
Michal
Signature · 2 lines
LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/