spam on kj ml
the number of spam gets annoying.
can somebody please update the spam filter ?
re,
wh
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 5 lines · walter harms
the number of spam gets annoying.
can somebody please update the spam filter ?re,
wh
why does kj ml not move to vger?
those are quite nicely maintained ml?
regards
Signature · 5 lines
maks _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 9 lines · maximilian attems
Quoted 5 lines · walter harms
the number of spam gets annoying.
can somebody please update the spam filter ?re,
whwhy does kj ml not move to vger?
those are quite nicely maintained ml?
Yes you are right, i am fed up with the Spams from KJ list. OTOH, linux-ntdev which is hosted on vger using majordomo rarely sends any spam.
I guess Alexey Dobriyan can answer this question more appropirately.
Thanks
--pradeep
Quoted 10 lines
regards
--
maks
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Signature · 5 lines
Pradeep _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 8 lines · pradeep singh
Quoted 7 lines · maximilian attems
Quoted 5 lines · walter harms
the number of spam gets annoying.
can somebody please update the spam filter ?re,
wh
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
why does kj ml not move to vger?
those are quite nicely maintained ml?Yes you are right, i am fed up with the Spams from KJ list. OTOH, linux-ntdev which is hosted on vger using majordomo rarely sends any spam.
I wouldn't be able to say anything for the lists on vger, but I have to agree, this list is just about the only source of email based SPAM I have left, it would be nice if it too can be eliminated.
Whilst we're on the topic of spam, our local LUG have recently been having issues with wiki spam (I've personally had to delete 35 pages last night, and revert various edits) - what measures are in place to protect the KJ wiki?
Jaco
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 5 lines · pradeep singh
Yes you are right, i am fed up with the Spams from KJ list. OTOH, linux-ntdev which is hosted on vger using majordomo rarely sends any spam.
I guess Alexey Dobriyan can answer this question more appropirately.
If the list isn't moving to somewhere like vger -- alsa-devel recently became a moderated list for non-subscribers and I guess you guys could do the same. The moderation (again, only for non-subscribers) doesn't need a huge amount of time and moderator roles can be handed out to anyone, not just list owners or anything like that. Works via web-interface and (optionally, I suppose) via email notifications...
Rene.
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 6 lines · Rene Herman
Quoted 4 lines · pradeep singh
Yes you are right, i am fed up with the Spams from KJ list. OTOH, linux-ntdev which is hosted on vger using majordomo rarely sends any spam.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
I guess Alexey Dobriyan can answer this question more appropirately.
If the list isn't moving to somewhere like vger -- alsa-devel recently became a moderated list for non-subscribers and I guess you guys could do the same. The moderation (again, only for non-subscribers) doesn't need a huge amount of time and moderator roles can be handed out to anyone, not just list owners or anything like that. Works via web-interface and (optionally, I suppose) via email notifications...
ok can we frame some consensus on how subscribers should be validated the frist time??
My suggestions :-
1. Include a captcha kind of thing while registering, may be like how much is 34+ 34 = or something like this.. It would be even easy to implement guess.
2. Stop non subscribers from sending any mail to the list.
3. Anyone who sends HTML is removed and need to resubscribe.
4. Have a spamassasin server up[this may be not easy] and keep it updated.
5. we all re-register using these rules to dafeguard the KJ list.
Sugegstions?
Thanks
Quoted 3 lines
Rene.
Signature · 5 lines
Pradeep _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 16 lines · Jaco Kroon
Quoted 8 lines · pradeep singh
Quoted 7 lines · maximilian attems
Quoted 5 lines · walter harms
the number of spam gets annoying.
can somebody please update the spam filter ?re,
whQuoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
why does kj ml not move to vger?
those are quite nicely maintained ml?Yes you are right, i am fed up with the Spams from KJ list. OTOH, linux-ntdev which is hosted on vger using majordomo rarely sends any spam.
Quoted 8 lines
I wouldn't be able to say anything for the lists on vger, but I have to agree, this list is just about the only source of email based SPAM I have left, it would be nice if it too can be eliminated.
Whilst we're on the topic of spam, our local LUG have recently been having issues with wiki spam (I've personally had to delete 35 pages last night, and revert various edits) - what measures are in place to protect the KJ wiki?
Make important pages immutable.
Any edits to the wiki do not reflect util approved by the page owner(s) or moderator(s).
Is it fair enough?
Thanks
Quoted 3 lines
Jaco
Signature · 5 lines
Pradeep _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Hello List,
please note that the spam notice went to the list-owner. I did a cc to the list in the assumption that more people are interested in removing the spam.
re,
wh
Quoted 11 lines · pradeep singh
Quoted 9 lines · maximilian attems
Quoted 5 lines · walter harms
the number of spam gets annoying.
can somebody please update the spam filter ?re,
whwhy does kj ml not move to vger?
those are quite nicely maintained ml?
Quoted 20 lines
Yes you are right, i am fed up with the Spams from KJ list. OTOH, linux-ntdev which is hosted on vger using majordomo rarely sends any spam.
I guess Alexey Dobriyan can answer this question more appropirately.
Thanks
--pradeepQuoted 10 lines
regards
Signature · 5 lines
maks _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 9 lines · pradeep singh
Quoted 6 lines · Rene Herman
If the list isn't moving to somewhere like vger -- alsa-devel recently became a moderated list for non-subscribers and I guess you guys could do the same. The moderation (again, only for non-subscribers) doesn't need a huge amount of time and moderator roles can be handed out to anyone, not just list owners or anything like that. Works via web-interface and (optionally, I suppose) via email notifications...
Quoted 8 lines
ok can we frame some consensus on how subscribers should be validated the frist time??
My suggestions :-
1. Include a captcha kind of thing while registering, may be like how much is 34+ 34 = or something like this.. It would be even easy to implement guess.
This is not necesary. alsa-devel hasn't seen any spammers subscribe the last few months. If it turns out at some point spammers are doing so that's early enough.
Quoted 1 line
2. Stop non subscribers from sending any mail to the list.
No, do not do that. As said, just make it _moderated_ for non-subscribers. On occasion a thread may want to be crossposted to linux-kernel and the subscribers there expect open access. Don't trade spam annoyances for spam-warring annoyances. As a moderator, you can elect to add From addresses to a approves/denies database or, better, just accept them manually and possibly send the poster a private message asking to subscribe.
As said, you can hand moderator privileges out as the only administrative list power, so just gather up a few volunteers. There should be enough on the kernel janitors list I believe (I'm not).
Quoted 1 line
3. Anyone who sends HTML is removed and need to resubscribe.
No, do not do that. You may want to let through a well-meaning post from a newbie and then just give him or her the, preferably friendly, _advice_ on how to post. This can even be a per-case moderator decision if you let HTML mail end up in the moderation queue...
Quoted 1 line
4. Have a spamassasin server up[this may be not easy] and keep it updated.
Ofcourse, a first run through a spam-filter where everything that is marked as spam with a high enough (define yourself..) probability doesn't even end up in the moderation queue is good.
You'd be surprised how easy it is to spot the remaining spam for a human from the subjects alone -- ie, moderators can deal with the remaining stuff with ease.
Quoted 1 line
5. we all re-register using these rules to dafeguard the KJ list.
No need for anyone to resubscribe (unless owners here would like to cleanup the database and filter dead subscribers while they're at it)
Rene.
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 9 lines · maximilian attems
Quoted 5 lines · walter harms
the number of spam gets annoying.
can somebody please update the spam filter ?re,
whwhy does kj ml not move to vger?
those are quite nicely maintained ml?
instead of making kernel-janitor the next subscriber closed base, which seems quite against it's intention. i'd suggest asking Randy and davem if they could do the mv. afair Randy set up the original osdl ml and davem easily adds linux related projects to vger?
and there seems a consensus that vger is good for the kernel-janitor list.
--
maks
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
On 7/5/07, Rene Herman <[email protected]> wrote:
[snip]
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
ok can we frame some consensus on how subscribers should be validated the frist time??
My suggestions :-
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
1. Include a captcha kind of thing while registering, may be like how much is 34+ 34 = or something like this.. It would be even easy to implement guess.
This is not necesary. alsa-devel hasn't seen any spammers subscribe the last few months. If it turns out at some point spammers are doing so that's early enough.
Ok, fair enough if a spam free list can be framed. :)
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 2 lines
2. Stop non subscribers from sending any mail to the list.
No, do not do that. As said, just make it _moderated_ for non-subscribers. On occasion a thread may want to be crossposted to linux-kernel and the subscribers there expect open access. Don't trade spam annoyances for spam-warring annoyances. As a moderator, you can elect to add From addresses to a approves/denies database or, better, just accept them manually and possibly send the poster a private message asking to subscribe.
Fair enough, let non-subscribers post then.
Why even send a private message to subscribe then i guess?
Quoted 3 lines
As said, you can hand moderator privileges out as the only administrative list power, so just gather up a few volunteers. There should be enough on the kernel janitors list I believe (I'm not).
This can be tricky IMHO.
How you identify whom to give priviliges.
What are the rules? etc etc .
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
3. Anyone who sends HTML is removed and need to resubscribe.
No, do not do that. You may want to let through a well-meaning post from a newbie and then just give him or her the, preferably friendly, _advice_ on how to post. This can even be a per-case moderator decision if you let HTML mail end up in the moderation queue...
Ok.
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 2 lines
4. Have a spamassasin server up[this may be not easy] and keep it updated.
Ofcourse, a first run through a spam-filter where everything that is marked as spam with a high enough (define yourself..) probability doesn't even end up in the moderation queue is good.
You'd be surprised how easy it is to spot the remaining spam for a human from the subjects alone -- ie, moderators can deal with the remaining stuff with ease.
Same point applies here.
identification of the moderators and subswquent chaos like, what if X moderator remains inactive for a long period...
all boils down to some rules. right?
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
5. we all re-register using these rules to dafeguard the KJ list.
No need for anyone to resubscribe (unless owners here would like to cleanup the database and filter dead subscribers while they're at it)
Yeah, lets leave that to the list owner.
Thanks
Signature · 5 lines
Pradeep _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 10 lines · pradeep singh
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 1 line
2. Stop non subscribers from sending any mail to the list.
No, do not do that. As said, just make it _moderated_ for non-subscribers. On occasion a thread may want to be crossposted to linux-kernel and the subscribers there expect open access. Don't trade spam annoyances for spam-warring annoyances. As a moderator, you can elect to add From addresses to a approves/denies database or, better, just accept them manually and possibly send the poster a private message asking to subscribe.
Quoted 2 lines
Fair enough, let non-subscribers post then.
Why even send a private message to subscribe then i guess?
Moderation introduces an inevitable delay even if with enough moderators it wouldn't be a large delay. Still an undesirable thing though so if I see from a moderated message that it's destined specifically for the alsa-devel list and is not one where it's just CCed as "catch-all sound thing CC" I tend to reply to the poster privately informing of the subscribtion policy and pointing out the delay. Ofcourse, fewer non-subscriber posts also means fewer things to moderate...
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
As said, you can hand moderator privileges out as the only administrative list power, so just gather up a few volunteers. There should be enough on the kernel janitors list I believe (I'm not).
This can be tricky IMHO. How you identify whom to give priviliges. What are the rules? etc etc
You ask who wants to and would like the more active members to volunteer. The rules would be "if (spam) reject(); else accept();" where "spam" is pretty tightly defined. Remember -- the moderators would've been put in place just as human spam filters, not as topic police so the rules are pretty darn simple.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
4. Have a spamassasin server up[this may be not easy] and keep it
updated.
Ofcourse, a first run through a spam-filter where everything that is marked as spam with a high enough (define yourself..) probability doesn't even end up in the moderation queue is good.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
You'd be surprised how easy it is to spot the remaining spam for a human from the subjects alone -- ie, moderators can deal with the remaining stuff with ease.
Same point applies here.
identification of the moderators and subswquent chaos like, what if X moderator remains inactive for a long period...
all boils down to some rules. right?
Rule 1 -- trust people to get it right unless proven otherwise. I believe you overestimate the amount of trouble non-subscriber moderation would be. kernel-janitors sees less traffic than alsa-devel, and _much_ less from non-subscribers (it's not a topic list to CC wen you're not doing specific janitor stuff) and if some of the more active articipants here would volunteer I believe things should readily work themselves out.
List-owner has to ask and set things up...
Rene.
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 15 lines · Rene Herman
Quoted 10 lines · pradeep singh
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 1 line
2. Stop non subscribers from sending any mail to the list.
No, do not do that. As said, just make it _moderated_ for non-subscribers. On occasion a thread may want to be crossposted to linux-kernel and the subscribers there expect open access. Don't trade spam annoyances for spam-warring annoyances. As a moderator, you can elect to add From addresses to a approves/denies database or, better, just accept them manually and possibly send the poster a private message asking to subscribe.
Quoted 2 lines
Fair enough, let non-subscribers post then.
Why even send a private message to subscribe then i guess?
Quoted 7 lines
Moderation introduces an inevitable delay even if with enough moderators it wouldn't be a large delay. Still an undesirable thing though so if I see from a moderated message that it's destined specifically for the alsa-devel list and is not one where it's just CCed as "catch-all sound thing CC" I tend to reply to the poster privately informing of the subscribtion policy and pointing out the delay. Ofcourse, fewer non-subscriber posts also means fewer things to moderate...
Yes, it introduces a delay. So here are a few further suggestions:
use dns blacklists to filter out any IP ranges within a DUL. This elimates a _lot_ of spam. Also, there are known "bad" servers out there, DNS BLs can also help filtering these out. These checks are pretty cheap, and it's accuracy is just about perfect (most of the time). I personally add a server to a local allow list periodically when I find that ISPs get blacklisted, this is usually done upon request when an email is sent to postmaster@ for the domain in question and I've talked to the ISP to make sure that they shouldn't be on the list. Users complains to their ISPs pretty quickly when mail starts bouncing.
Perform sender-callout verifications. This filters out a _lot_ of SPAM.
Block bounces from going to the list (A lot of spam seem to have a NULL return path but then puts an address in the From: header). Bounces have no reason to go to the list as the list return path has a -bounces appended.
Checks on the email addresses listed in headers like To: and From: to ensure they are formatted correctly. This also seems to be highly effective, and not that costly.
Greylisting? Annoying, but it mostly helps to filter out many of the "drop and run" spam bots (although, these generally tend to only help on the DUL ranges anyway).
If after that we still get too much spam, then set up spamassassin as well, get some extra rules from SARE, my SA seems to function well with the reject required score set to 7, in the six months where I trialled it I didn't get many legit messages going over that, and those that did I really didn't want to receive anyway (receive and forward type spam).
And were always HTML-based mail (which we are against anyway).
Note, none of these checks rely on spamassassin. Spamassassin, whilst pretty effective is a resource consumer like few others things I've worked with. Try to filter out as much stuff as possible _before_ passing messages to spamassassin.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
As said, you can hand moderator privileges out as the only administrative
list power, so just gather up a few volunteers. There should be enough on
the kernel janitors list I believe (I'm not).
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
This can be tricky IMHO. How you identify whom to give priviliges. What are the rules? etc etc
You ask who wants to and would like the more active members to volunteer. The rules would be "if (spam)
reject(); elseaccept();" where "spam" is pretty tightly defined. Remember -- the moderators would've been put in place just as human spam filters, not as topic police so the rules are pretty darn simple.
I would keep this as a last step. Or simply put a "human check" in place, ie, if this person hasn't sent mail to the list before, just send him/her an email, asking to respond to a link, after clicking this link, the email is allowed to pass through. Not sure if either ezlm, majordomo or mailman supports this out of the box though.
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line
4. Have a spamassasin server up[this may be not easy] and keep it
updated.
Yes, sa-update is not that difficult to put in a cron job on a daily basis, and to just restart spamd when it's done.
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Ofcourse, a first run through a spam-filter where everything that is marked as spam with a high enough (define yourself..) probability doesn't even end up in the moderation queue is good.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
You'd be surprised how easy it is to spot the remaining spam for a human from the subjects alone -- ie, moderators can deal with the remaining stuff with ease.
Same point applies here.
identification of the moderators and subswquent chaos like, what if X moderator remains inactive for a long period...
all boils down to some rules. right?
Quoted 6 lines
Rule 1 -- trust people to get it right unless proven otherwise. I believe you overestimate the amount of trouble non-subscriber moderation would be. kernel-janitors sees less traffic than alsa-devel, and _much_ less from non-subscribers (it's not a topic list to CC wen you're not doing specific janitor stuff) and if some of the more active articipants here would volunteer I believe things should readily work themselves out.
I agree, however, stay away from human intervention as far as possible.
I used to do this for our local LUG ... it eventually becomes a full
time job in it's own right. Also, even with notifications to the moderators, what happens if none of them looks for three days? No, imho, rather just filter as much of the crap automatically as possible, and let the rest come. It should be much reduced, if it's still too much, then we can take further action.
Jaco
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 7 lines · maximilian attems
Quoted 6 lines · maximilian attems
Quoted 5 lines · walter harms
the number of spam gets annoying.
can somebody please update the spam filter ?re,
wh
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
why does kj ml not move to vger?
those are quite nicely maintained ml?instead of making kernel-janitor the next subscriber closed base, which seems quite against it's intention. i'd suggest asking Randy and davem if they could do the mv. afair Randy set up the original osdl ml and davem easily adds linux related projects to vger?
I probably did set it up at OSDL, but I don't have admin access to it now. Alexey is listed as the admin:
Kernel-janitors list run by adobriyan at gmail.com
Yes, I'd be happy to see it moved to vger.
Quoted 5 lines
and there seems a consensus that vger is good for the kernel-janitor list.
--
maks
Signature · 6 lines
~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 07:53:00 -0700
Quoted 1 line
Yes, I'd be happy to see it moved to vger.
[email protected] has been created.
In keeping with how this is handled in every other instance in the past, I am not going to allow the existing subscriber list to be propagated wholesale to the vger list.
Forcing people to subscribe to the new list serves several purposes, none the least of which is that people test out that their path to vger works bi-directionally.
If I were to simply copy the subscribers over by hand, half the list would bounce in the first posting and I refuse to sift through that. :)
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 11 lines · David Miller
From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 07:53:00 -0700Quoted 1 line
Yes, I'd be happy to see it moved to vger.
[email protected] has been created.
In keeping with how this is handled in every other instance in the past, I am not going to allow the existing subscriber list to be propagated wholesale to the vger list.
Quoted 7 lines
Forcing people to subscribe to the new list serves several purposes, none the least of which is that people test out that their path to vger works bi-directionally.
If I were to simply copy the subscribers over by hand, half the list would bounce in the first posting and I refuse to sift through that. :)
Thanks Dave!
/me goes and subscribes to the new list.
- Arnaldo
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 6 lines · David Miller
From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 07:53:00 -0700Quoted 1 line
Yes, I'd be happy to see it moved to vger.
[email protected] has been created.
Kudos to you Dave.
Thanks a lot.
Signature · 5 lines
Pradeep _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 6 lines · David Miller
From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 07:53:00 -0700Quoted 1 line
Yes, I'd be happy to see it moved to vger.
[email protected] has been created.
A small query Dave.
Is it ok to be subscribed to KJ lists on both osdl and vger lists? If i unsubscribe from the osdl's KJ list and subscribe to vger's, i will not miss any message i hope?
Thanks once again.
--pradeep
Quoted 18 lines
In keeping with how this is handled in every other instance in the past, I am not going to allow the existing subscriber list to be propagated wholesale to the vger list.
Forcing people to subscribe to the new list serves several purposes, none the least of which is that people test out that their path to vger works bi-directionally.
If I were to simply copy the subscribers over by hand, half the list would bounce in the first posting and I refuse to sift through that. :)
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Signature · 5 lines
Pradeep _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 4 lines · pradeep singh
Quoted 3 lines · David Miller
From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 07:53:00 -0700
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
Yes, I'd be happy to see it moved to vger.
[email protected] has been created.
A small query Dave.
Is it ok to be subscribed to KJ lists on both osdl and vger lists? If i unsubscribe from the osdl's KJ list and subscribe to vger's, i will not miss any message i hope?
Erm... I don't think so.
We should subscribe to the new list and allow for a transition period were some people will still send messages to the old list, kindly telling them to stop doing so and instead post to the new list.
- Arnaldo
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 7 lines · pradeep singh
[snip]
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
A small query Dave.
Is it ok to be subscribed to KJ lists on both osdl and vger lists? If i unsubscribe from the osdl's KJ list and subscribe to vger's, i will not miss any message i hope?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Erm... I don't think so.
We should subscribe to the new list and allow for a transition period were some people will still send messages to the old list, kindly telling them to stop doing so and instead post to the new list.
Fair enough. This means i need to send a message to both KJ lists?
I guess its OK for a few days, but please add something like:
-----------
WARNING: please subscribe to [email protected], by sending a message to [email protected] with "subscribe kernel-janitors" in the message body, [email protected] will be soon terminated, hasta la vista, baby!
-----------
At the end of the message to provide for ample warning about the mailing list move 8-)
- Arnaldo
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
[snip]
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 5 lines
A small query Dave.
Is it ok to be subscribed to KJ lists on both osdl and vger lists? If i unsubscribe from the osdl's KJ list and subscribe to vger's, i will not miss any message i hope?Erm... I don't think so.
We should subscribe to the new list and allow for a transition period were some people will still send messages to the old list, kindly telling them to stop doing so and instead post to the new list.
Fair enough. This means i need to send a message to both KJ lists?
Thanks Arnaldo.
--pradeep
Quoted 3 lines
- Arnaldo
Signature · 5 lines
Pradeep _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 11 lines · Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Quoted 1 line
Fair enough. This means i need to send a message to both KJ lists?
I guess its OK for a few days, but please add something like:
-----------
WARNING: please subscribe to [email protected], by sending a message to [email protected] with "subscribe kernel-janitors" in the message body, [email protected] will be soon terminated, hasta la vista, baby!
-----------
Quoted 2 lines
At the end of the message to provide for ample warning about the mailing list move 8-)
[clickety-click]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
On 7/6/07, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Is it ok to be subscribed to KJ lists on both osdl and vger lists? If i unsubscribe from the osdl's KJ list and subscribe to vger's, i will not miss any message i hope?
Erm... I don't think so.
[...]
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Fair enough. This means i need to send a message to both KJ lists?
I guess its OK for a few days, but please add something like:
Can this be set by default at the list server, please?
That would be the best way, adding by default as a footer for all mails on KJ. May be Alexey Dobriyan should be requested.[CCing him]
Thanks
Quoted 13 lines
-----------
WARNING: please subscribe to [email protected], by sending a message to [email protected] with "subscribe kernel-janitors" in the message body, [email protected] will be soon terminated, hasta la vista, baby!
-----------At the end of the message to provide for ample warning about the mailing list move 8-)
- Arnaldo
Signature · 5 lines
Pradeep _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 12 lines · Alexey Dobriyan
Quoted 11 lines · Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Quoted 1 line
Fair enough. This means i need to send a message to both KJ lists?
I guess its OK for a few days, but please add something like:
-----------
WARNING: please subscribe to [email protected], by sending a message to [email protected] with "subscribe kernel-janitors" in the message body, [email protected] will be soon terminated, hasta la vista, baby!
-----------
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
At the end of the message to provide for ample warning about the mailing list move 8-)
[clickety-click]
Alexey, can you submit a patch to update MAINTAINERS as well?
Thanks,
Nish
_______________________________________________
REMINDER: this mailing list moved to vger.kernel.org and current one will be discontinued soon. To resubscribe, send email to [email protected] with
"subscribe kernel-janitors" in message body and follow instructions.
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 1 line · Nish Aravamudan
Alexey, can you submit a patch to update
MAINTAINERSas well?
I wanted to, but max was faster. It's already in mainline together with updated main webpage.
_______________________________________________
REMINDER: this mailing list moved to vger.kernel.org and current one will be discontinued soon. To resubscribe, send email to [email protected] with
"subscribe kernel-janitors" in message body and follow instructions.
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors