removing e2fsprogs compiling warnings

This patch remove 3 compiling warning of current e2fsprogs git.

Best regards.

Coly

index b50ff7c..ce0301f 100644
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <ctype.h>
 #include <string.h>
+#include <strings.h>
 #include <time.h>
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/stat.h>

index 69a43b0..c8fffa1 100644
@@ -585,8 +585,8 @@ static int probe_luks(struct blkid_probe *probe,
        unsigned char uuid[40];
        /* 168 is the offset to the 40 character uuid:
         * http://luks.endorphin.org/LUKS-on-disk-format.pdf */
-       strncpy(uuid, buf+168, 40);
-       blkid_set_tag(probe->dev, "UUID", uuid, sizeof(uuid));
+       strncpy((char *)uuid, (const char *)(buf+168), 40);
+       blkid_set_tag(probe->dev, "UUID", (const char *)uuid, sizeof(uuid));
        return 0;
 }
 

index 88c5a74..29c5a5c 100644
@@ -1012,7 +1012,7 @@ int main (int argc, char ** argv)
                }
        } else from_count = 0;
        if (from_count >= last_block) {
-           com_err (program_name, 0, _("invalid starting block (%d):

must be less than %lu"),
+ com_err (program_name, 0, _("invalid starting block (%lu):
must be less than %lu"),
(unsigned long) from_count, (unsigned long)

last_block);
            exit (1);
        }

In the future, can you please include a "Signed-off-by" with your patches? This patch is simple enough that I'll apply it without it, but for anything non-trivial I won't apply it without a DCO.

Thanks, regards,

- Ted

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Theodore,

Do you mean "Signed-off-by Coly Li <[email protected]>" ?
I just though this is used for others to sign my patch :-) Should I add this to the patch this time ?

Thanks

- --
Coly Li
SuSE PRC Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGtBeiuTp8cyZ5lTERAiwPAKCyoew5Y/20UghUsDkhYE2gJ9+1LwCeIyhI wweynOLUgWP/9xHYqThk1i0=
=NfDi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Oh, I find this patch is applied already. Thanks for noting Signed-off-by :-)

Coly
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGtCL5uTp8cyZ5lTERAgsBAKCfv1un8o+lnBxhkGSUI2bWl3xzsACfUE55 x5BQBf6ZTxtWksbjrmxxTNk=
=P9Ex
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

No, it's really bad to add a Signed-off-by for anyone other than yourself, since it has legal significance. It's something that you have to do for yourself. :-)

Quoting from SUBMITTING-PATCHES:

The sign-off is a simple line at the end of the explanation for the patch, which certifies that you wrote it or otherwise have the right to pass it on as a open-source patch. The rules are pretty simple: if you can certify the below:

Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1

By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:

(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I have the right to submit it under the open source license indicated in the file; or

(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source license and I have the right under that license to submit that work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part by me, under the same open source license (unless I am permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated in the file; or

(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified it.

(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution are public and that a record of the contribution (including all personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with this project or the open source license(s) involved.

then you just add a line saying

In this case of your gcc -Wall cleanups, the changes involved were small and probably fell below the threshold of something that could be protected by copyright --- and I ended up choosing a different way of cleaning up for one or two of the cleanups anyway. But for anything non-trivial, these days I am requested a Developers Certification of Origin.

Regards,

- Ted

clear, this is a perfect explaining for Signed-off-by :-)

Thanks a lot.

Coly