Skip to contentSkip to conversation

backtrace.S & printk()

DISCUSSION Andy Kennedy 2 participants 3 messages Sep 5, 2007 Memory technology devices (MTD)

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Russel:

While attempting to build a kernel without printk in it, I ran across an error in your backtrace.S file. It appears that you are assuming that all arm kernels will be built with printk(). What is your reason for this? What are the ramifications of me taking out those three sections of code?

Andy Kennedy
TechMon Inc.

#1 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:14:11 -0500 Andy Kennedy <[email protected]> wrote:

Russel:

While attempting to build a kernel without printk in it, I ran across an error in your backtrace.S file. It appears that you are assuming that all arm kernels will be built with printk(). What is your reason for this? What are the ramifications of me taking out those three sections of code?

Erm... wrong list? This is the MTD list, not the ARM list...

josh

#2 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · Josh Boyer
Quoted 4 lines · On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:14:11 -0500 Andy Kennedy <[email protected]> wrote:

Russel:

While attempting to build a kernel without printk in it, I ran across an error in your backtrace.S file. It appears that you are assuming that all arm kernels will be built with printk(). What is your reason for this? What are the ramifications of me taking out those three sections of code?

Quoted 10 lines

Erm... wrong list? This is the MTD list, not the ARM list...

josh

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

Oh please. . . Linux-ARM Linux-MTD. . . it's all the same.

Bummer man. . . been a loooong week.

Andy