Some warning: ... cleanup; realy no interest?
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines · Matthew Wilcox
Quoted 1 line · Joel Soete
mmm and what do you think about adding yet another format letter e.g. [rR] for
resource_size_tas it was done for [zZ]?You'd also have to teach gcc about it.
What should I teach to gcc?
Don't try, it's a waste of effort. Just do the cast to unsigned long long as previously suggested.
Dave
Signature · 2 lines
J. David Anglin [email protected] National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 11 lines · John David Anglin
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines · Matthew Wilcox
Quoted 1 line · Joel Soete
mmm and what do you think about adding yet another format letter e.g. [rR] for
resource_size_tas it was done for [zZ]?You'd also have to teach gcc about it.
What should I teach to gcc?
Don't try, it's a waste of effort. Just do the cast to unsigned long long as previously suggested.
I'd rather do neither. Talking to Viro we've been thinking about removing the format check attributes from the kernel and using sparse instead, which is under a bit tighter control.
--Kyle
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 11 lines · Kyle McMartin
Quoted 9 lines · John David Anglin
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines · Matthew Wilcox
Quoted 1 line · Joel Soete
mmm and what do you think about adding yet another format letter e.g. [rR] for
resource_size_tas it was done for [zZ]?You'd also have to teach gcc about it.
What should I teach to gcc?
Don't try, it's a waste of effort. Just do the cast to unsigned long long as previously suggested.
Quoted 7 lines
I'd rather do neither. Talking to Viro we've been thinking about removing the format check attributes from the kernel and using sparse instead, which is under a bit tighter control.
--Kyle
Tx for feedback,
j.