Skip to contentSkip to conversation

r8169 & TX offload

DISCUSSION Vladislav Bolkhovitin 2 participants 3 messages Oct 16, 2007 – Oct 17, 2007

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hello,

I've recently bought Realtek RTL8169S-32 chip based Gigabit Ethernet card:

# lspci -vv
Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10)
        Subsystem: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 Gigabit 
Ethernet
        Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- 
ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
        Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium 
Quoted 1 line

TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-

        Latency: 64 (8000ns min, 16000ns max), Cache Line Size 20
        Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 10
        Region 0: I/O ports at c400 [size=256]
        Region 1: Memory at fe9fec00 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256]
        Expansion ROM at fe9c0000 [disabled] [size=128K]
        Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=375mA 

PME(D0-,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-

I've noticed that all TX offload features (tx-checksumming, scatter-gather and TSO) are disabled by default and should be manually enabled by ethtool. I wonder, is there any particular reason for that? Why they are not enabled by default as it was done for e1000 or tg3? Are there any hidden drawbacks in enabling them?

Those offload options are definitely work. They give in my setup (32-bit 66MHz PCI, Xeon 1.7GHz CPU, open-iscsi) CPU offload from 75% to 45% and data write throughput improvement from 55MB/s to 59MB/s.

Regards,
Vlad

#1 lore raw

(please remove l-k from the Cc:, this ought to be sent to netdev)

Vladislav Bolkhovitin <[email protected]> :

Quoted 4 lines

I've recently bought Realtek RTL8169S-32 chip based Gigabit Ethernet card:

# lspci -vv

[...]

Quoted 3 lines

I've noticed that all TX offload features (tx-checksumming, scatter-gather and TSO) are disabled by default and should be manually enabled by ethtool. I wonder, is there any particular reason for that?

As far as I can tell, it is mostly a lack of pressure from the users and my desire to avoid a change of behavior.

Quoted 2 lines

Why they are not enabled by default as it was done for e1000 or tg3? Are there any hidden drawbacks in enabling them?

None that I know of. I had not noticed a huge difference and people did not comment a lot either...

Quoted 3 lines

Those offload options are definitely work. They give in my setup (32-bit 66MHz PCI, Xeon 1.7GHz CPU, open-iscsi) CPU offload from 75% to 45% and data write throughput improvement from 55MB/s to 59MB/s.

...but your datapoint is welcome.

Signature · 1 line
Ueimor
#2 lore raw
Quoted 1 line · Francois Romieu

(please remove l-k from the Cc:, this ought to be sent to netdev)

OK. Sorry, for some reason I thought I read in the MAINTAINERS file that LKML is the mailing list for r8169 driver.

Quoted 10 lines

Vladislav Bolkhovitin <[email protected]> :

Quoted 3 lines

I've recently bought Realtek RTL8169S-32 chip based Gigabit Ethernet card:

# lspci -vv

[...]

Quoted 1 line

I've noticed that all TX offload features (tx-checksumming, scatter-gather and TSO) are disabled by default and should be manually enabled by ethtool. I wonder, is there any particular reason for that?

Quoted 7 lines

As far as I can tell, it is mostly a lack of pressure from the users and my desire to avoid a change of behavior.

Quoted 1 line

Why they are not enabled by default as it was done for e1000 or tg3? Are there any hidden drawbacks in enabling them?

None that I know of. I had not noticed a huge difference and people did not comment a lot either...

I think, 30% of CPU saving is worth enough to turn TX offload on, especially if a system does something more than just data transfers. Usually, such options are enabled by default unless there are some hidden important drawbacks, like stability issues. Hence, there are questions like mine: it's just too suspicious that something good doesn't have hidden issues if it isn't enabled by author ;)

Thanks for clarification.

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line

Those offload options are definitely work. They give in my setup (32-bit 66MHz PCI, Xeon 1.7GHz CPU, open-iscsi) CPU offload from 75% to 45% and data write throughput improvement from 55MB/s to 59MB/s.

...but your datapoint is welcome.