Consolidate nf_sockopt and compat_nf_sockopt
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/2 Consolidate nf_sockopt and compat_nf_sockopt
Both lookup the nf_sockopt_ops object to call the get/set callbacks from, but they perform it in a completely similar way.
Introduce the helper for finding the ops.
---
net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c +44 -64
@@ -61,48 +61,59 @@ void nf_unregister_sockopt(struct nf_sockopt_ops *reg) }EXPORT_SYMBOL (nf_unregister_sockopt); -/* Call get/setsockopt() */ -static int nf_sockopt (struct sock *sk,int pf,int val, -char __user *opt,int *len,int get) +static struct nf_sockopt_ops *nf_sockopt_find (struct sock *sk,int pf, +int val,int get) {struct list_head *i;struct nf_sockopt_ops *ops; -int ret;if (sk->sk_net != &init_net) -return -ENOPROTOOPT ; +return ERR_PTR (-ENOPROTOOPT );if (mutex_lock_interruptible (&nf_sockopt_mutex) !=0 ) -return -EINTR ; +return ERR_PTR (-EINTR );list_for_each (i, &nf_sockopts) { ops = (struct nf_sockopt_ops *)i;if (ops->pf == pf) {if (!try_module_get (ops->owner)) goto out_nosup; +if (get) { -if (val >= ops->get_optmin - && val < ops->get_optmax) { -mutex_unlock (&nf_sockopt_mutex); - ret = ops->get (sk, val, opt, len); +if (val >= ops->get_optmin && + val < ops->get_optmax) goto out; - } }else { -if (val >= ops->set_optmin - && val < ops->set_optmax) { -mutex_unlock (&nf_sockopt_mutex); - ret = ops->set (sk, val, opt, *len); +if (val >= ops->set_optmin && + val < ops->set_optmax) goto out; - } }module_put (ops->owner); } } - out_nosup: +out_nosup: + ops =ERR_PTR (-ENOPROTOOPT ); +out:mutex_unlock (&nf_sockopt_mutex); -return -ENOPROTOOPT ; +return ops; +} + +/* Call get/setsockopt() */ +static int nf_sockopt (struct sock *sk,int pf,int val, +char __user *opt,int *len,int get) +{ +struct nf_sockopt_ops *ops; +int ret; + + ops =nf_sockopt_find (sk, pf, val, get); +if (IS_ERR (ops)) +return PTR_ERR (ops); + +if (get) + ret = ops->get (sk, val, opt, len); +else + ret = ops->set (sk, val, opt, *len); - out:module_put (ops->owner);return ret; }
@@ -124,56 +135,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nf_getsockopt);static int compat_nf_sockopt (struct sock *sk,int pf,int val,char __user *opt,int *len,int get) { -struct list_head *i;struct nf_sockopt_ops *ops;int ret; -if (sk->sk_net != &init_net) -return -ENOPROTOOPT ; - - -if (mutex_lock_interruptible (&nf_sockopt_mutex) !=0 ) -return -EINTR ; - -list_for_each (i, &nf_sockopts) { - ops = (struct nf_sockopt_ops *)i; -if (ops->pf == pf) { -if (!try_module_get (ops->owner)) - goto out_nosup; - -if (get) { -if (val >= ops->get_optmin - && val < ops->get_optmax) { -mutex_unlock (&nf_sockopt_mutex); -if (ops->compat_get) - ret = ops->compat_get (sk, - val, opt, len); -else - ret = ops->get (sk, - val, opt, len); - goto out; - } - }else { -if (val >= ops->set_optmin - && val < ops->set_optmax) { -mutex_unlock (&nf_sockopt_mutex); -if (ops->compat_set) - ret = ops->compat_set (sk, - val, opt, *len); -else - ret = ops->set (sk, - val, opt, *len); - goto out; - } - } -module_put (ops->owner); - } + ops =nf_sockopt_find (sk, pf, val, get); +if (IS_ERR (ops)) +return PTR_ERR (ops); + +if (get) { +if (ops->compat_get) + ret = ops->compat_get (sk, val, opt, len); +else + ret = ops->get (sk, val, ops, len); + }else { +if (ops->compat_set) + ret = ops->compat_set (sk, val, ops, *len); +else + ret = ops->set (sk, val, ops, *len); } - out_nosup: -mutex_unlock (&nf_sockopt_mutex); -return -ENOPROTOOPT ; - out:module_put (ops->owner);return ret; }
Signature · 1 line
1.5.3.4
Quoted 6 lines · Pavel Emelyanov
Both lookup the
nf_sockopt_opsobject to call the get/set callbacks from, but they perform it in a completely similar way.Introduce the helper for finding the ops.
Signed-off-by Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected] >
This conflicts with a cleanup patch from Alexey Dobriyan. I'll push it upstream today, please resend after rediffing. Thanks.
Quoted 4 lines · Patrick McHardy
Quoted 3 lines · Pavel Emelyanov
Both lookup the
nf_sockopt_opsobject to call the get/set callbacks from, but they perform it in a completely similar way.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Introduce the helper for finding the ops.
Signed-off-by Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected] >This conflicts with a cleanup patch from Alexey Dobriyan. I'll push it upstream today, please resend after rediffing. Thanks.
Amazing :) Alexey's patch does the same thing as my 2nd one does :) I will resend this one :)
Thanks,
Pavel