8xx cleanups
v2 cover 8xx cleanups
Hi,
this is a series against paulus for-2.6.25 tree to clean up various 8xx related stuff. The series can be pulled from git://git.bocc.de/dbox2.git cleanup.
Patch 6 has been modified to remove the #ifdefs as suggested by Arndt Bergmann. Patch 8 is a new one.
[POWERPC] Remove unused m8xx_cpm_hostalloc/free/dump() [POWERPC] Rename m8xx_pic_init to mpc8xx_pics_init [POWERPC] Remove unneeded and misspelled prototype m8xx_calibrate_decr [POWERPC] Remove declaration of m8xx_pic_init.
[POWERPC] Remove sysdev/commproc.h
[POWERPC] Get rid of conditional includes of board specific setup [POWERPC] Rename commproc to cpm1 and cpm2_common.c to cpm2.c [POWERPC] Move definition of buffer descriptor to cpm.h
Thanks,
Jochen
Quoted 7 lines · Jochen Friedrich
Hi,
this is a series against paulus for-2.6.25 tree to clean up various 8xx related stuff. The series can be pulled from
git://git.bocc.de/dbox2.gitcleanup.
Patch 6 has been modified to remove the #ifdefs as suggested by Arndt Bergmann. Patch 8 is a new one.
Quoted 8 lines
[POWERPC] Remove unused m8xx_cpm_hostalloc/free/dump() [POWERPC] Rename
m8xx_pic_inittompc8xx_pics_init[POWERPC] Remove unneeded and misspelled prototypem8xx_calibrate_decr[POWERPC] Remove declaration ofm8xx_pic_init.
[POWERPC] Removesysdev/commproc.h
[POWERPC] Get rid of conditional includes of board specific setup [POWERPC] Rename commproc to cpm1 andcpm2_common.ctocpm2.c[POWERPC] Move definition of buffer descriptor tocpm.h
These roughly look good, had a few comments. Don't see any reason why they can't go in.
What impact do the have on boards in arch/ppc being able to build?
- k
Quoted 2 lines
What impact do the have on boards in
arch/ppcbeing able to build?
Byt the way what are the plans for powerpc?
We have:arch/ppcarch/ppc64arch/powerpc
It was my understanding that arch/powerpc was supposed to be the future unified powerpc architecture but it does not even provide a defconfig.
And I do not see too much happening to do so - but that maybe because I looked at a wrong place.
Sam
Quoted 8 lines · Sam Ravnborg
Quoted 1 line
What impact do the have on boards in
arch/ppcbeing able to build?Byt the way what are the plans for powerpc?
We have:arch/ppcarch/ppc64arch/powerpc
Quoted 6 lines
It was my understanding that
arch/powerpcwas supposed to be the future unified powerpc architecture but it does not even provide a defconfig.And I do not see too much happening to do so - but that maybe because I looked at a wrong place.
You must have looked in the wrong place. :-)
arch/ppc is scheduled for removal from mainline in June.
arch/powerpc is under significant development, with lots of defconfigs in arch/powerpc/configs.
arch/ppc64 is long dead.
jdl
Quoted 13 lines · Jon Loeliger
Quoted 12 lines · Sam Ravnborg
Quoted 1 line
What impact do the have on boards in
arch/ppcbeing able to build?Byt the way what are the plans for powerpc?
We have:arch/ppcarch/ppc64arch/powerpcIt was my understanding that
arch/powerpcwas supposed to be the future unified powerpc architecture but it does not even provide a defconfig.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
And I do not see too much happening to do so - but that maybe because I looked at a wrong place.
You must have looked in the wrong place. :-)
arch/ppcis scheduled for removal from mainline in June.
Good to hear.
Quoted 2 lines
arch/powerpcis under significant development, with lots of defconfigs inarch/powerpc/configs.
Double checked - it was my build script that used ARCH=ppc Now I just need to build another toolchain as the ppc750 could not build the defconfig. crosstool is my friend here.
Sam
Quoted 19 lines · On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:00:12 +0100 Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 18 lines · Jon Loeliger
Quoted 8 lines · Sam Ravnborg
Quoted 1 line
What impact do the have on boards in
arch/ppcbeing able to build?Byt the way what are the plans for powerpc?
We have:arch/ppcarch/ppc64arch/powerpcQuoted 6 lines
It was my understanding that
arch/powerpcwas supposed to be the future unified powerpc architecture but it does not even provide a defconfig.And I do not see too much happening to do so - but that maybe because I looked at a wrong place.
You must have looked in the wrong place. :-)
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
arch/ppcis scheduled for removal from mainline in June.Good to hear.
Quoted 2 lines
arch/powerpcis under significant development, with lots of defconfigs inarch/powerpc/configs.Double checked - it was my build script that used ARCH=ppc Now I just need to build another toolchain as the ppc750 could not build the defconfig. crosstool is my friend here.
You'll need mkimage if you ever venture into some of the embedded board configs. Just an FYI.
josh
Quoted 25 lines · Josh Boyer
Quoted 22 lines · On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:00:12 +0100 Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 13 lines · Jon Loeliger
Quoted 12 lines · Sam Ravnborg
Quoted 1 line
What impact do the have on boards in
arch/ppcbeing able to build?Byt the way what are the plans for powerpc?
We have:arch/ppcarch/ppc64arch/powerpcIt was my understanding that
arch/powerpcwas supposed to be the future unified powerpc architecture but it does not even provide a defconfig.Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
And I do not see too much happening to do so - but that maybe because I looked at a wrong place.
You must have looked in the wrong place. :-)
arch/ppcis scheduled for removal from mainline in June.Good to hear.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
arch/powerpcis under significant development, with lots of defconfigs inarch/powerpc/configs.Double checked - it was my build script that used ARCH=ppc Now I just need to build another toolchain as the ppc750 could not build the defconfig. crosstool is my friend here.
You'll need mkimage if you ever venture into some of the embedded board configs. Just an FYI.
I known - for now I'm 120% occupied getting modpost in shape and will return to the mkimage thread when below 100%.
Sam