cleanup: correct tabbing of check_kill_permission()
PATCH 1/1 cleanup: correct tabbing of check_kill_permission()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andrew
Here is a small patch to reformat the check_kill_permission() function. It doesn't change any functionality.
There was something confusing about its tabbing previously, and it also ran over the 80 column limit.
Cheers
Andrew
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHydmF+bHCR3gb8jsRAmehAKDVnrOMVkHPhZslnhE1tVVXl2x07gCgsAse LdjzfIwC+dmOqfDGLwnhaOo=
=pQEM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From 7dda0a7adb7ab870e01f93b6b066598665e15f7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew G. Morgan <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:49:22 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Reformat check_kill_permission() function to make it readable.
--- kernel/signal.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
kernel/signal.c +7 -5
@@ -530,17 +530,19 @@ static int check_kill_permission(int sig, struct siginfo *info,if (!valid_signal (sig))return error; -if (info ==SEND_SIG_NOINFO || (!is_si_special (info) &&SI_FROMUSER (info))) { - error =audit_signal_info (sig, t);/* Let audit system see the signal */ +if (info ==SEND_SIG_NOINFO + || (!is_si_special (info) &&SI_FROMUSER (info))) { +/* Let audit system see the signal */ + error =audit_signal_info (sig, t);if (error)return error; error = -EPERM ; -if (((sig !=SIGCONT ) || - (task_session_nr (current) !=task_session_nr (t))) +if (((sig !=SIGCONT ) + || (task_session_nr (current) !=task_session_nr (t))) && (current->euid ^ t->suid) && (current->euid ^ t->uid) && (current->uid ^ t->suid) && (current->uid ^ t->uid) && !capable (CAP_KILL )) -return error; +return error; }return security_task_kill (t, info, sig,0 );
Signature · 1 line
1.5.3.7
Quoted 6 lines · Andrew G. Morgan
kernel/signal.c +4
-0+if (info ==SEND_SIG_NOINFO + || (!is_si_special (info) &&SI_FROMUSER (info))) { +/* Let audit system see the signal */ + error =audit_signal_info (sig, t);if (error)return error;
kernel/signal.c static int check_kill_permission(int sig, struct siginfo *info, · line 545
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/signal.c +3
-3error = -EPERM ; -if (((sig !=SIGCONT ) || - (task_session_nr (current) !=task_session_nr (t))) +if (((sig !=SIGCONT ) + || (task_session_nr (current) !=task_session_nr (t))) && (current->euid ^ t->suid) && (current->euid ^ t->uid) && (current->uid ^ t->suid) && (current->uid ^ t->uid) && !capable (CAP_KILL )) -return error; +return error;
If you start reformmating it please get it completely right:
if (info == SEND_SIG_NOINFO ||
(!is_si_special(info) && SI_FROMUSER(info))) {
/* Let audit system see the signal */
error = audit_signal_info(sig, t);
if (error)
return error;
error = -EPERM;
if ((sig != SIGCONT ||
(task_session_nr(current) != task_session_nr(t))) &&
(current->euid ^ t->suid) && (current->euid ^ t->uid) &&
(current->uid ^ t->suid) && (current->uid ^ t->uid) &&
!capable(CAP_KILL))
return error;}
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Christoph,
I ran it through scripts/checkpatch.pl - it said it was ok - and I see that other places in this file contain code of this style - do_sigaltstack() for example.
Could you give me a reference for "completely right"? Its not obvious to me that Documentation/CodingStyle is what you are using as a reference.
Thanks
Andrew
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
| On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 02:32:38PM -0800, Andrew G. Morgan wrote:
|> + if (info == SEND_SIG_NOINFO
|> + || (!is_si_special(info) && SI_FROMUSER(info))) {
|> + /* Let audit system see the signal */
|> + error = audit_signal_info(sig, t);
|> if (error)
|> return error;
|> error = -EPERM;
|> - if (((sig != SIGCONT) ||
|> - (task_session_nr(current) != task_session_nr(t)))
|> + if (((sig != SIGCONT)
|> + || (task_session_nr(current) != task_session_nr(t)))
|> && (current->euid ^ t->suid) && (current->euid ^ t->uid)
|> && (current->uid ^ t->suid) && (current->uid ^ t->uid)
|> && !capable(CAP_KILL))
|> - return error;
|> + return error;
|
| If you start reformmating it please get it completely right:
|
| if (info == SEND_SIG_NOINFO ||
| (!is_si_special(info) && SI_FROMUSER(info))) {
| /* Let audit system see the signal */
| error = audit_signal_info(sig, t);
| if (error)
| return error;
| error = -EPERM;
| if ((sig != SIGCONT ||
| (task_session_nr(current) != task_session_nr(t))) &&
| (current->euid ^ t->suid) && (current->euid ^ t->uid) &&
| (current->uid ^ t->suid) && (current->uid ^ t->uid) &&
| !capable(CAP_KILL))
| return error;
| }-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHyjfn+bHCR3gb8jsRAuilAJ9QJKsEQz66UrFtLOCcHVokGcVV7wCeP0HE ftOI2APLX1YpWiznyhLfN6U=
=HGa0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Quoted 3 lines · Andrew G. Morgan
...
I ran it throughscripts/checkpatch.pl- it said it was ok
...
checkpatch is just a tool pointing to some common mistakes, not the definite authority for proving that code is stylistically correct.
Similar to the fact that I hope you wouldn't claim your code was working correctly only because gcc compiled it without warnings...
cu
Adrian
Signature · 4 lines
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed