: Fix local_addr deletions during list traversals.
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 : Fix local_addr deletions during list traversals.
Hi David
Can please send this to stable as well...
Thanks
-vlad
--
From: Chidambar 'ilLogict' Zinnoury <[email protected]>
Since the lists are circular, we need to explicitely tag the address to be deleted since we might end up freeing the list head instead. This fixes some interesting SCTP crashes.
Signed-off-by Chidambar 'ilLogict' Zinnoury <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Vlad Yasevich <[email protected]>
---
net/sctp/bind_addr.c | 4 +++- net/sctp/ipv6.c | 4 +++- net/sctp/protocol.c | 4 +++- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
net/sctp/bind_addr.c +0 -0
@@ -209,6 +209,7 @@ int sctp_add_bind_addr(struct sctp_bind_addr *bp, union sctp_addr *new,
int sctp_del_bind_addr(struct sctp_bind_addr *bp, union sctp_addr *del_addr)
{
struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *addr, *temp;+ int found = 0;
/* We hold the socket lock when calling this function,
* and that acts as a writer synchronizing lock.
@@ -216,13 +217,14 @@ int sctp_del_bind_addr(struct sctp_bind_addr *bp, union sctp_addr *del_addr)
list_for_each_entry_safe(addr, temp, &bp->address_list, list) {
if (sctp_cmp_addr_exact(&addr->a, del_addr)) {
/* Found the exact match. */
+ found = 1;
addr->valid = 0;
list_del_rcu(&addr->list);
break;
}
}- if (addr && !addr->valid) {
+ if (found) {
call_rcu(&addr->rcu, sctp_local_addr_free);
SCTP_DBG_OBJCNT_DEC(addr);
return 0;net/sctp/ipv6.c +0 -0
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ static int sctp_inet6addr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev,
struct inet6_ifaddr *ifa = (struct inet6_ifaddr *)ptr; struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *addr = NULL; struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *temp;
+ int found = 0;
switch (ev) {
case NETDEV_UP:
@@ -111,13 +112,14 @@ static int sctp_inet6addr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev,
&sctp_local_addr_list, list) {
if (ipv6_addr_equal(&addr->a.v6.sin6_addr,
&ifa->addr)) {
+ found = 1;
addr->valid = 0;
list_del_rcu(&addr->list);
break;
}
}
spin_unlock_bh(&sctp_local_addr_lock);
- if (addr && !addr->valid)
+ if (found)
call_rcu(&addr->rcu, sctp_local_addr_free);
break;
}net/sctp/protocol.c +0 -0
@@ -628,6 +628,7 @@ static int sctp_inetaddr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev,
struct in_ifaddr *ifa = (struct in_ifaddr *)ptr; struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *addr = NULL; struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *temp;
+ int found = 0;
switch (ev) {
case NETDEV_UP:
@@ -647,13 +648,14 @@ static int sctp_inetaddr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev,
list_for_each_entry_safe(addr, temp,
&sctp_local_addr_list, list) {
if (addr->a.v4.sin_addr.s_addr == ifa->ifa_local) {
+ found = 1;
addr->valid = 0;
list_del_rcu(&addr->list);
break;
}
}
spin_unlock_bh(&sctp_local_addr_lock);
- if (addr && !addr->valid)
+ if (found)
call_rcu(&addr->rcu, sctp_local_addr_free);
break;
}Signature · 1 line
1.5.3.5
David Miller
maintainerFrom: Vlad Yasevich <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:45:09 -0400
Quoted 1 line
Can please send this to stable as well...
I will do this when I get a chance, thanks.