: Add some notes about per-bind-bucket sock lookup.
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 : Add some notes about per-bind-bucket sock lookup.
I was asked about "why don't we perform a sk_net filtering in bind_conflict calls, like we do in other sock lookup places" for a couple of times.
Can we please add a comment about why we do not need one?
Signed-off-by Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>
--- net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 7 +++++++ net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c +7 -0
@@ -55,6 +55,13 @@ int inet_csk_bind_conflict(const struct sock *sk,struct hlist_node *node;int reuse = sk->sk_reuse; +/* +* Unlike other sk lookup places we do not check +* for sk_net here, since _all_ the socks listed +* in tb->owners list belong to the same net - the +* one this bucket belongs to. +*/ +sk_for_each_bound (sk2, node, &tb->owners) { if (sk != sk2 && !inet_v6_ipv6only(sk2) &&
net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c +4 -0
@@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ int inet6_csk_bind_conflict(const struct sock *sk,const struct hlist_node *node;/* We must walk the whole port owner list in this case. -DaveM */ +/* +* See comment in inet_csk_bind_conflict about sock lookup +* vs net namespaces issues. +*/ sk_for_each_bound (sk2, node, &tb->owners) { if (sk != sk2 && (!sk->sk_bound_dev_if ||
Signature · 1 line
1.5.3.4
From: Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:39:46 +0400
Quoted 7 lines
I was asked about "why don't we perform a
sk_netfiltering inbind_conflictcalls, like we do in other sock lookup places" for a couple of times.Can we please add a comment about why we do not need one?
Signed-off-by Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>
Applied, thanks Pavel.