: Fix bogus ASSERT_RTNL warning
Subsystems (2)
This patch should fix/silence the warning reported by Denys Fedoryshchenko. Looking at kerneloops.org, there are also a huge number of reports of this warning triggered by wireless, so even if this is not the ideal solution, I think for now we should just silence it.
commit 0d034d8ef5cc2f9f4df960d4f8625c1061282e69
Author: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]> Date: Thu Apr 24 05:40:27 2008 +0200
[RTNETLINK]: Fix bogus ASSERT_RTNL warning
ASSERT_RTNL uses mutex_trylock to test whether the rtnl_mutex is held. This bogus warnings when running in atomic context, which f.e. happens when adding secondary unicast addresses through macvlan or vlan or when synchronizing multicast addresses from wireless devices.
Mid-term we might want to consider moving all address updates to process context since the locking seems overly complicated, for now just fix the bogus warning by changing ASSERT_RTNL to use mutex_is_locked().
include/linux/rtnetlink.h +2 -2
@@ -740,13 +740,13 @@ extern void rtmsg_ifinfo(int type, struct net_device *dev, unsigned change);extern void rtnl_lock (void );extern void rtnl_unlock (void );extern int rtnl_trylock (void ); +extern int rtnl_is_locked (void );extern void rtnetlink_init (void );extern void __rtnl_unlock (void );#define ASSERT_RTNL () do { \ - if (unlikely(rtnl_trylock())) { \ - rtnl_unlock(); \ + if (unlikely(!rtnl_is_locked())) { \ printk(KERN_ERR "RTNL: assertion failed at %s (%d)\n", \ __FILE__, __LINE__); \ dump_stack(); \
net/core/rtnetlink.c +6 -0
@@ -82,6 +82,11 @@ int rtnl_trylock(void)return mutex_trylock (&rtnl_mutex); } +int rtnl_is_locked (void ) +{ +return mutex_is_locked (&rtnl_mutex); +} +static struct rtnl_link *rtnl_msg_handlers[NPROTO ];static inline int rtm_msgindex (int msgtype)
@@ -1402,6 +1407,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtnetlink_put_metrics);EXPORT_SYMBOL (rtnl_lock);EXPORT_SYMBOL (rtnl_trylock);EXPORT_SYMBOL (rtnl_unlock); +EXPORT_SYMBOL (rtnl_is_locked);EXPORT_SYMBOL (rtnl_unicast);EXPORT_SYMBOL (rtnl_notify);EXPORT_SYMBOL (rtnl_set_sk_err);
David Miller
maintainerFrom: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:44:03 +0200
Quoted 5 lines
This patch should fix/silence the warning reported by Denys Fedoryshchenko. Looking at kerneloops.org, there are also a huge number of reports of this warning triggered by wireless, so even if this is not the ideal solution, I think for now we should just silence it.
Thanks Patrick, I'll probably send this to -stable too.
We can handle this more elegantly with followon patches if we want.