qemu-kvm: fix guest resetting
PATCH 1/1 qemu-kvm: fix guest resetting
Resetting guests used to be racy, deadlock-prone, or simply broken (for SMP). This patch fixes the issues - at least for me on x86 (tested on Intel SMP host, UP and SMP guest, in-kernel und user space irqchip, guest- and monitor-issued resets). Note that ia64 and powerpc may need to look into the SMP thing as well (=>kvm_arch_cpu_reset).
At this chance, the patch also cleans up some unneeded reset fragments.
--- qemu/qemu-kvm-ia64.c | 4 ++++ qemu/qemu-kvm-powerpc.c | 4 ++++ qemu/qemu-kvm-x86.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ qemu/qemu-kvm.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------- qemu/qemu-kvm.h | 1 + qemu/vl.c | 11 ++++++----- 6 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
qemu/qemu-kvm.c +18 -20
@@ -28,8 +28,6 @@ kvm_context_t kvm_context;extern int smp_cpus; -static int qemu_kvm_reset_requested; -pthread_mutex_t qemu_mutex =PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER ;pthread_cond_t qemu_aio_cond =PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER ;pthread_cond_t qemu_vcpu_cond =PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER ;
@@ -56,7 +54,6 @@ struct vcpu_info {int signalled;int stop;int stopped; -int reload_regs;int created; } vcpu_info[256 ];
@@ -257,17 +254,20 @@ static int all_threads_paused(void)static void pause_all_threads (void ) { +CPUState *cpu_single = cpu_single_env;int i; -for (i =0 ; i < smp_cpus; ++i) { - vcpu_info[i].stop =1 ; -pthread_kill (vcpu_info[i].thread,SIG_IPI ); - } +for (i =0 ; i < smp_cpus; ++i) +if (!cpu_single || cpu_single->cpu_index != i) { + vcpu_info[i].stop =1 ; +pthread_kill (vcpu_info[i].thread,SIG_IPI ); + } +while (!all_threads_paused ()) {pthread_mutex_unlock (&qemu_mutex); -kvm_eat_signal (&io_signal_table,NULL ,1000 ); +kvm_eat_signal (&io_signal_table, cpu_single,1000 );pthread_mutex_lock (&qemu_mutex); - cpu_single_env =NULL ; + cpu_single_env = cpu_single; } }
@@ -317,11 +317,18 @@ void qemu_kvm_system_reset_request(void) {int i; +pause_all_threads (); + +qemu_system_reset (); + +for (i =0 ; i < smp_cpus; ++i) +kvm_arch_cpu_reset (vcpu_info[i].env); +for (i =0 ; i < smp_cpus; ++i) { - vcpu_info[i].reload_regs =1 ; + vcpu_info[i].stop =0 ; + vcpu_info[i].stopped =0 ;pthread_kill (vcpu_info[i].thread,SIG_IPI ); } -qemu_system_reset (); }static int kvm_main_loop_cpu (CPUState *env)
@@ -354,11 +361,6 @@ static int kvm_main_loop_cpu(CPUState *ekvm_cpu_exec (env); env->interrupt_request &= ~CPU_INTERRUPT_EXIT ;kvm_main_loop_wait (env,0 ); -if (info->reload_regs) { - info->reload_regs =0 ; -if (env->cpu_index ==0 )/* ap needs to be placed in INIT */ -kvm_arch_load_regs (env); - } }pthread_mutex_unlock (&qemu_mutex);return 0 ;
@@ -467,10 +469,6 @@ int kvm_main_loop(void)break ; else if (qemu_powerdown_requested()) qemu_system_powerdown(); - else if (qemu_reset_requested()) { -pthread_kill (vcpu_info[0 ].thread,SIG_IPI ); - qemu_kvm_reset_requested =1 ; - }pthread_mutex_unlock (&qemu_mutex); }
qemu/qemu-kvm-ia64.c +4 -0
@@ -61,3 +61,7 @@ int kvm_arch_try_push_interrupts(void *ovoid kvm_arch_update_regs_for_sipi (CPUState *env) { } + +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset (CPUState *env) +{ +}
qemu/qemu-kvm-powerpc.c +4 -0
@@ -213,3 +213,7 @@ int handle_powerpc_dcr_write(int vcpu, ureturn 0 ;/* XXX ignore failed DCR ops */ } + +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset (CPUState *env) +{ +}
qemu/qemu-kvm-x86.c +16 -0
@@ -689,3 +689,19 @@ int handle_tpr_access(void *opaque, intkvm_tpr_access_report (cpu_single_env, rip, is_write);return 0 ; } + +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset (CPUState *env) +{ +struct kvm_mp_state mp_state = { .mp_state =KVM_MP_STATE_UNINITIALIZED }; + +kvm_arch_load_regs (env); +if (env->cpu_index !=0 ) { +if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel (kvm_context)) +kvm_set_mpstate (kvm_context, env->cpu_index, &mp_state); +else { + env->interrupt_request &= ~CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD ; + env->hflags |=HF_HALTED_MASK ; + env->exception_index =EXCP_HLT ; + } + } +}
qemu/qemu-kvm.h +1 -0
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ void kvm_arch_post_kvm_run(void *opaque,int kvm_arch_has_work (CPUState *env);int kvm_arch_try_push_interrupts (void *opaque);void kvm_arch_update_regs_for_sipi (CPUState *env); +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset (CPUState *env);CPUState *qemu_kvm_cpu_env (int index);
qemu/vl.c +6 -5
@@ -7235,6 +7235,12 @@ void qemu_system_reset(void)void qemu_system_reset_request (void ) { +#ifdef USE_KVM +if (kvm_allowed && !no_reboot) { +qemu_kvm_system_reset_request (); +return ; + } +#endif if (no_reboot) { shutdown_requested =1 ; }else {
@@ -7242,11 +7248,6 @@ void qemu_system_reset_request(void) }if (cpu_single_env)cpu_interrupt (cpu_single_env,CPU_INTERRUPT_EXIT ); -#ifdef USE_KVM -if (kvm_allowed) -if (!no_reboot) -qemu_kvm_system_reset_request (); -#endif }void qemu_system_shutdown_request (void )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
Hi Jan,
Quoted 18 lines · Jan Kiszka
Resetting guests used to be racy, deadlock-prone, or simply broken (for SMP). This patch fixes the issues - at least for me on x86 (tested on Intel SMP host, UP and SMP guest, in-kernel und user space irqchip, guest- and monitor-issued resets). Note that ia64 and powerpc may need to look into the SMP thing as well (=>kvm_arch_cpu_reset).
At this chance, the patch also cleans up some unneeded reset fragments.
Signed-off-by Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>---
qemu/qemu-kvm.c +4
-0@@ -317,11 +317,18 @@ void qemu_kvm_system_reset_request(void) {int i; +pause_all_threads (); + +qemu_system_reset (); +
qemu/qemu-kvm.c void qemu_kvm_system_reset_request(void) · line 324
Quoted 10 lines
qemu/qemu-kvm.c +5
-2+for (i =0 ; i < smp_cpus; ++i) +kvm_arch_cpu_reset (vcpu_info[i].env); +for (i =0 ; i < smp_cpus; ++i) { - vcpu_info[i].reload_regs =1 ; + vcpu_info[i].stop =0 ; + vcpu_info[i].stopped =0 ;pthread_kill (vcpu_info[i].thread,SIG_IPI ); } -qemu_system_reset ();
Why don't you signal the IO thread to pause all vcpu's and place their registers and "run state" in the proper condition if the reset request comes from the guest? It should simplify things a lot (and avoid any changes to vl.c).
After signalling the vcpu should stop instead of returning to guest mode.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
Quoted 37 lines · Marcelo Tosatti
Hi Jan,
Quoted 18 lines · Jan Kiszka
Resetting guests used to be racy, deadlock-prone, or simply broken (for SMP). This patch fixes the issues - at least for me on x86 (tested on Intel SMP host, UP and SMP guest, in-kernel und user space irqchip, guest- and monitor-issued resets). Note that ia64 and powerpc may need to look into the SMP thing as well (=>kvm_arch_cpu_reset).
At this chance, the patch also cleans up some unneeded reset fragments.
Signed-off-by Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>---
qemu/qemu-kvm.c +4
-0@@ -317,11 +317,18 @@ void qemu_kvm_system_reset_request(void) {int i; +pause_all_threads (); + +qemu_system_reset (); +qemu/qemu-kvm.c void qemu_kvm_system_reset_request(void) · line 324
Quoted 10 lines
qemu/qemu-kvm.c +5
-2+for (i =0 ; i < smp_cpus; ++i) +kvm_arch_cpu_reset (vcpu_info[i].env); +for (i =0 ; i < smp_cpus; ++i) { - vcpu_info[i].reload_regs =1 ; + vcpu_info[i].stop =0 ; + vcpu_info[i].stopped =0 ;pthread_kill (vcpu_info[i].thread,SIG_IPI ); } -qemu_system_reset ();Why don't you signal the IO thread to pause all vcpu's and place their registers and "run state" in the proper condition if the reset request comes from the guest? It should simplify things a lot (and avoid any changes to
vl.c).
Quoted 2 lines
After signalling the vcpu should stop instead of returning to guest mode.
Hmm, need to think a bit more about it as I don't see the benefit yet (code suggestions are welcome in the meantime :)!).
The changes to vl.c are actually cleanups, as pause_all_threads() is now context-agnostic and we no longer need to go through the qemu way of raising reset. This new property of pause_all_threads() is something we should desire for simplicity and robustness reasons anyway (e.g. to simplify guest debugging later on). And the way qemu_kvm_system_reset_request() is implemented would not change, we need this serialization to avoid races between IO and VCPU threads.
Jan
Signature · 8 lines
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
Quoted 2 lines · Jan Kiszka
Hmm, need to think a bit more about it as I don't see the benefit yet (code suggestions are welcome in the meantime :)!).
Doing the reset from two different contexes is confusing and more complicated.
Quoted 5 lines
The changes to
vl.care actually cleanups, aspause_all_threads()is now context-agnostic and we no longer need to go through the qemu way of raising reset. This new property ofpause_all_threads()is something we should desire for simplicity and robustness reasons anyway (e.g. to simplify guest debugging later on).
You can signal the IO thread (main_loop_break in the current kvm-userspace.git) and then stop.
Quoted 3 lines
And the way
qemu_kvm_system_reset_request()is implemented would not change, we need this serialization to avoid races between IO and VCPU threads.
How about this ?
qemu/qemu-kvm-ia64.c +4 -0
@@ -61,3 +61,7 @@ int kvm_arch_try_push_interrupts(void *opaque)void kvm_arch_update_regs_for_sipi (CPUState *env) { } + +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset (CPUState *env) +{ +}
qemu/qemu-kvm-powerpc.c +4 -0
@@ -213,3 +213,7 @@ int handle_powerpc_dcr_write(int vcpu, uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t data)return 0 ;/* XXX ignore failed DCR ops */ } + +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset (CPUState *env) +{ +}
qemu/qemu-kvm-x86.c +16 -0
@@ -689,3 +689,19 @@ int handle_tpr_access(void *opaque, int vcpu,kvm_tpr_access_report (cpu_single_env, rip, is_write);return 0 ; } + +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset (CPUState *env) +{ +struct kvm_mp_state mp_state = { .mp_state =KVM_MP_STATE_UNINITIALIZED }; + +kvm_arch_load_regs (env); +if (env->cpu_index !=0 ) { +if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel (kvm_context)) +kvm_set_mpstate (kvm_context, env->cpu_index, &mp_state); +else { + env->interrupt_request &= ~CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD ; + env->hflags |=HF_HALTED_MASK ; + env->exception_index =EXCP_HLT ; + } + } +}
qemu/qemu-kvm.c +25 -21
103 lines not on this page · raw message
qemu/qemu-kvm.h +1 -0
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ void kvm_arch_post_kvm_run(void *opaque, int vcpu);int kvm_arch_has_work (CPUState *env);int kvm_arch_try_push_interrupts (void *opaque);void kvm_arch_update_regs_for_sipi (CPUState *env); +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset (CPUState *env);CPUState *qemu_kvm_cpu_env (int index);
qemu/vl.c +1 -5
@@ -7302,11 +7302,7 @@ void qemu_system_reset_request(void) }if (cpu_single_env)cpu_interrupt (cpu_single_env,CPU_INTERRUPT_EXIT ); -#ifdef USE_KVM -if (kvm_allowed) -if (!no_reboot) -qemu_kvm_system_reset_request (); -#endif +main_loop_break (); }void qemu_system_shutdown_request (void )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
Quoted 81 lines · Marcelo Tosatti
qemu/qemu-kvm-ia64.c +4
-0@@ -61,3 +61,7 @@ int kvm_arch_try_push_interrupts(void *opaque)void kvm_arch_update_regs_for_sipi (CPUState *env) { } + +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset (CPUState *env) +{ +}qemu/qemu-kvm-powerpc.c +4
-0@@ -213,3 +213,7 @@ int handle_powerpc_dcr_write(int vcpu, uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t data)return 0 ;/* XXX ignore failed DCR ops */ } + +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset (CPUState *env) +{ +}qemu/qemu-kvm-x86.c +16
-0@@ -689,3 +689,19 @@ int handle_tpr_access(void *opaque, int vcpu,kvm_tpr_access_report (cpu_single_env, rip, is_write);return 0 ; } + +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset (CPUState *env) +{ +struct kvm_mp_state mp_state = { .mp_state =KVM_MP_STATE_UNINITIALIZED }; + +kvm_arch_load_regs (env); +if (env->cpu_index !=0 ) { +if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel (kvm_context)) +kvm_set_mpstate (kvm_context, env->cpu_index, &mp_state); +else { + env->interrupt_request &= ~CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD ; + env->hflags |=HF_HALTED_MASK ; + env->exception_index =EXCP_HLT ; + } + } +}qemu/qemu-kvm.c +5
-3@@ -31,8 +31,6 @@ kvm_context_t kvm_context;extern int smp_cpus; -static int qemu_kvm_reset_requested; -pthread_mutex_t qemu_mutex =PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER ;pthread_cond_t qemu_aio_cond =PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER ;pthread_cond_t qemu_vcpu_cond =PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER ;@@ -52,7 +50,6 @@ struct vcpu_info {int signalled;int stop;int stopped; -int reload_regs;int created; } vcpu_info[256 ];@@ -242,21 +239,29 @@ static void pause_all_threads(void) {int i; +if (cpu_single_env) { +fprintf (stderr,"qemu-kvm: pause_all_threads from vcpu context\n" ); +exit (0 ); + } +for (i =0 ; i < smp_cpus; ++i) { vcpu_info[i].stop =1 ;pthread_kill (vcpu_info[i].thread,SIG_IPI );
qemu/qemu-kvm.c static void pause_all_threads(void) · line 255
Quoted 10 lines
qemu/qemu-kvm.c +2
-4} -while (!all_threads_paused ()) { -CPUState *env = cpu_single_env; +while (!all_threads_paused ())pthread_cond_wait (&qemu_pause_cond, &qemu_mutex); - cpu_single_env = env; - } + cpu_single_env =NULL ; }
Personally, I prefer it the old way. All of the open-coded cpu_single_env's are tough to understand and I believe error-prone. I think a strategy of explicitly preserving cpu_single_env whenever we drop qemu_mutex is more robust. Explicitly setting cpu_single_env = NULL happens to work because this is only called from the io thread. It's less clear to a casual reader why it's necessary.
In fact, I'd be much more inclined to see a wrapper around pthread_cond_wait() so that we never explicitly had to set cpu_single_env.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Quoted 5 lines
qemu/qemu-kvm.c +0
-1}void qemu_system_shutdown_request (void ) -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quoted 9 lines
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
Quoted 100 lines · Anthony Liguori
Quoted 81 lines · Marcelo Tosatti
qemu/qemu-kvm-ia64.c +4
-0@@ -61,3 +61,7 @@ int kvm_arch_try_push_interrupts(void *opaque)void kvm_arch_update_regs_for_sipi (CPUState *env) { } + +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset (CPUState *env) +{ +}qemu/qemu-kvm-powerpc.c +4
-0@@ -213,3 +213,7 @@ int handle_powerpc_dcr_write(int vcpu, uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t data)return 0 ;/* XXX ignore failed DCR ops */ } + +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset (CPUState *env) +{ +}qemu/qemu-kvm-x86.c +16
-0@@ -689,3 +689,19 @@ int handle_tpr_access(void *opaque, int vcpu,kvm_tpr_access_report (cpu_single_env, rip, is_write);return 0 ; } + +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset (CPUState *env) +{ +struct kvm_mp_state mp_state = { .mp_state =KVM_MP_STATE_UNINITIALIZED }; + +kvm_arch_load_regs (env); +if (env->cpu_index !=0 ) { +if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel (kvm_context)) +kvm_set_mpstate (kvm_context, env->cpu_index, &mp_state); +else { + env->interrupt_request &= ~CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD ; + env->hflags |=HF_HALTED_MASK ; + env->exception_index =EXCP_HLT ; + } + } +}qemu/qemu-kvm.c +5
-3@@ -31,8 +31,6 @@ kvm_context_t kvm_context;extern int smp_cpus; -static int qemu_kvm_reset_requested; -pthread_mutex_t qemu_mutex =PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER ;pthread_cond_t qemu_aio_cond =PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER ;pthread_cond_t qemu_vcpu_cond =PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER ;@@ -52,7 +50,6 @@ struct vcpu_info {int signalled;int stop;int stopped; -int reload_regs;int created; } vcpu_info[256 ];@@ -242,21 +239,29 @@ static void pause_all_threads(void) {int i; +if (cpu_single_env) { +fprintf (stderr,"qemu-kvm: pause_all_threads from vcpu context\n" ); +exit (0 ); + } +for (i =0 ; i < smp_cpus; ++i) { vcpu_info[i].stop =1 ;pthread_kill (vcpu_info[i].thread,SIG_IPI );qemu/qemu-kvm.c static void pause_all_threads(void) · line 255
Quoted 10 lines
qemu/qemu-kvm.c +2
-4} -while (!all_threads_paused ()) { -CPUState *env = cpu_single_env; +while (!all_threads_paused ())pthread_cond_wait (&qemu_pause_cond, &qemu_mutex); - cpu_single_env = env; - } + cpu_single_env =NULL ; }Personally, I prefer it the old way. All of the open-coded cpu_single_env's are tough to understand and I believe error-prone. I think a strategy of explicitly preserving
cpu_single_envwhenever we dropqemu_mutexis more robust. Explicitly settingcpu_single_env= NULL happens to work because this is only called from the io thread. It's less clear to a casual reader why it's necessary.
Quoted 2 lines
In fact, I'd be much more inclined to see a wrapper around
pthread_cond_wait()so that we never explicitly had to setcpu_single_env.
You mean something like this?
(Hunks may have some offsets, the patch is from the middle of my queue.)
Marcelo, I'm fine with your approach. I even switched my vm_stop-on-breakpoint patch to this pattern, and it seems to work nicely. Will roll out an updated series later (but probably not today - weather is too fine here 8)).
--- qemu/qemu-kvm.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
qemu/qemu-kvm.c +19 -13
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ int kvm_allowed = 1;int kvm_irqchip =1 ;int kvm_pit =1 ; +#include <assert.h> #include <string.h> #include "hw/hw.h" #include "sysemu.h"
@@ -65,6 +66,14 @@ static inline unsigned long kvm_get_threreturn syscall (SYS_gettid); } +static void qemu_cond_wait (pthread_cond_t *cond) +{ +CPUState *env = cpu_single_env; + +pthread_cond_wait (cond, &qemu_mutex); + cpu_single_env = env; +} +CPUState *qemu_kvm_cpu_env (int index) {return vcpu_info[index].env;
@@ -247,21 +256,22 @@ static void pause_all_threads(void) {int i; +assert (!cpu_single_env); +for (i =0 ; i < smp_cpus; ++i) { vcpu_info[i].stop =1 ;pthread_kill (vcpu_info[i].thread,SIG_IPI ); } -while (!all_threads_paused ()) { -CPUState *env = cpu_single_env; -pthread_cond_wait (&qemu_pause_cond, &qemu_mutex); - cpu_single_env = env; - } +while (!all_threads_paused ()) +qemu_cond_wait (&qemu_pause_cond); }static void resume_all_threads (void ) {int i; +assert (!cpu_single_env); +for (i =0 ; i < smp_cpus; ++i) { vcpu_info[i].stop =0 ; vcpu_info[i].stopped =0 ;
@@ -380,7 +390,7 @@ static void *ap_main_loop(void *_env)/* and wait for machine initialization */ while (!qemu_system_ready) -pthread_cond_wait (&qemu_system_cond, &qemu_mutex); +qemu_cond_wait (&qemu_system_cond);pthread_mutex_unlock (&qemu_mutex);kvm_main_loop_cpu (env);
@@ -392,7 +402,7 @@ void kvm_init_new_ap(int cpu, CPUState *pthread_create (&vcpu_info[cpu].thread,NULL , ap_main_loop, env);while (vcpu_info[cpu].created ==0 ) -pthread_cond_wait (&qemu_vcpu_cond, &qemu_mutex); +qemu_cond_wait (&qemu_vcpu_cond); }int kvm_init_ap (void )
@@ -901,8 +911,6 @@ void qemu_kvm_aio_wait_start(void)void qemu_kvm_aio_wait (void ) { -CPUState *cpu_single = cpu_single_env; -if (!cpu_single_env) {if (io_thread_sigfd !=-1 ) {fd_set rfds;
@@ -919,10 +927,8 @@ void qemu_kvm_aio_wait(void)sigfd_handler ((void *)(unsigned long )io_thread_sigfd); }qemu_aio_poll (); - }else { -pthread_cond_wait (&qemu_aio_cond, &qemu_mutex); - cpu_single_env = cpu_single; - } + }else +qemu_cond_wait (&qemu_aio_cond); }void qemu_kvm_aio_wait_end (void )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone