Bsdacct: stir up comments around acct_process.
PATCH 1/1 Bsdacct: stir up comments around acct_process.
Fix the one describing what this function is and add one more - about locking absence around pid namespaces loop.
Signed-off-by Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>
---
kernel/acct.c +7 -1
@@ -657,7 +657,8 @@ static void acct_process_in_ns(struct pid_namespace *ns) }/** -* acct_process - now just a wrapper around do_acct_process +* acct_process - now just a wrapper around acct_process_in_ns, +* which int turn is a wrapper around do_acct_process. * * handles process accounting for an exiting task */
@@ -665,6 +666,11 @@ void acct_process(void) {struct pid_namespace *ns; +/* +* This loop is safe lockless, since current it still +* alive and holds its namespace, which in turn holds +* its parent. +*/ for (ns =task_active_pid_ns (current); ns !=NULL ; ns = ns->parent)acct_process_in_ns (ns); }
Quoted 12 lines · On Fri, 16 May 2008 14:54:59 +0400 Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Fix the one describing what this function is and add one more - about locking absence around pid namespaces loop.
Signed-off-by Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>---
kernel/acct.c +0
-0
kernel/acct.c static void acct_process_in_ns(struct pid_namespace *ns) · line 661
Quoted 6 lines
kernel/acct.c +2
-1@@ -657,7 +657,8 @@ static void acct_process_in_ns(struct pid_namespace *ns) }/** -* acct_process - now just a wrapper around do_acct_process +* acct_process - now just a wrapper around acct_process_in_ns, +* which int turn is a wrapper around do_acct_process.
in
kernel/acct.c void acct_process(void) · line 670
Quoted 9 lines
kernel/acct.c +2
-0* * handles process accounting for an exiting task */ @@ -665,6 +666,11 @@ void acct_process(void) {struct pid_namespace *ns; +/* +* This loop is safe lockless, since current it still
is still
kernel/acct.c void acct_process(void) · line 676
Quoted 6 lines
kernel/acct.c +3
-0+* alive and holds its namespace, which in turn holds +* its parent. +*/ for (ns =task_active_pid_ns (current); ns !=NULL ; ns = ns->parent)acct_process_in_ns (ns); }
---
~Randy