Reallocating sd device
Testing a 16 SATA drive (/dev/sd[c-r]1), md RAID, with drives installed in a hotswap SAS/SATA enclosure.
Failed out /dev/sdd1, ejected the drive from the enclosure, reinserted it and the system added it back as /dev/sds:
Jun 9 11:24:37 flash2 kernel: mptsas: ioc0: removing sata device, channel 0, id 30, phy 5 Jun 9 11:24:37 flash2 kernel: sd 4:0:1:0: [sdd] Synchronizing SCSI cache
Jun 9 11:24:37 flash2 kernel: sd 4:0:1:0: [sdd] Result:
hostbyte=DID_NO_CONNECT driverbyte=DRIVER_OK,SUGGEST_OK
Jun 9 11:26:38 flash2 kernel: mptsas: ioc0: attaching sata device,
channel 0, id 30, phy 5
Jun 9 11:26:38 flash2 kernel: scsi 4:0:17:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD7500AYYS-0 4G30 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
Jun 9 11:26:38 flash2 kernel: sd 4:0:17:0: [sds] 1465149168 512-byte
hardware sectors (750156 MB)
Rebooting shows the offline drive back as /dev/sdd.
Is there a safe, (OK to do on a mounted, active array), way of changing the sds back to sdd, prior to adding it back into the array, without having to reboot?
Regards,
Richard
James Bottomley
maintainerQuoted 19 lines · Richard Scobie
Testing a 16 SATA drive (/dev/sd[c-r]1), md RAID, with drives installed in a hotswap SAS/SATA enclosure.
Failed out
/dev/sdd1, ejected the drive from the enclosure, reinserted it and the system added it back as/dev/sds:Jun 9 11:24:37 flash2 kernel: mptsas: ioc0: removing sata device, channel 0, id 30, phy 5 Jun 9 11:24:37 flash2 kernel: sd 4:0:1:0: [sdd] Synchronizing SCSI cacheJun 9 11:24:37 flash2 kernel: sd 4:0:1:0: [sdd] Result:hostbyte=DID_NO_CONNECT driverbyte=DRIVER_OK,SUGGEST_OK
Jun 9 11:26:38 flash2 kernel: mptsas: ioc0: attaching sata device,channel 0, id 30, phy 5
Jun 9 11:26:38 flash2 kernel: scsi 4:0:17:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD7500AYYS-0 4G30 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
Quoted 8 lines
Jun 9 11:26:38 flash2 kernel: sd 4:0:17:0: [sds] 1465149168 512-bytehardware sectors (750156 MB)
Rebooting shows the offline drive back as
/dev/sdd.Is there a safe, (OK to do on a mounted, active array), way of changing the sds back to sdd, prior to adding it back into the array, without having to reboot?
Not really ... relying on a specific sdX name has been deprecated for a while. To ensure absolute ordering, you should be using the device by id or by label.
James
Quoted 5 lines · James Bottomley
Not really ... relying on a specific sdX name has been deprecated for a while. To ensure absolute ordering, you should be using the device by id or by label.
James
Thanks. I was trying to avoid the extra work of modifying smartd.conf files after drives are replaced, which seem to only be able to use /dev/sdX, or am I missing something?
Regards,
Richard
James Bottomley
maintainerQuoted 11 lines · Richard Scobie
Quoted 5 lines · James Bottomley
Not really ... relying on a specific sdX name has been deprecated for a while. To ensure absolute ordering, you should be using the device by id or by label.
James
Thanks. I was trying to avoid the extra work of modifying smartd.conf files after drives are replaced, which seem to only be able to use
/dev/sdX, or am I missing something?
Depends how you're doing it. I'm pretty sure smartmon is perfectly capable of using /dev/disk/by-id/X; some of the maintainers are on this list, so they can comment further. However, the auto generator for it (if that's what you're using) always emits /dev/sdX, so I agree you have a problem with autogenerated files.
James
Quoted 5 lines · James Bottomley
Depends how you're doing it. I'm pretty sure smartmon is perfectly capable of using
/dev/disk/by-id/X; some of the maintainers are on this list, so they can comment further. However, the auto generator for it (if that's what you're using) always emits/dev/sdX, so I agree you have a problem with autogenerated files.
Many thanks James, I was unaware of the /dev/disk/by-id/X devices and you are correct, smartmontools works fine with these - mdadm also.
Regards,
Richard