I2C node in device tree breaks old-style drivers
I'm trying to debug an I2C problem I've found in my old-style driver:sound/soc/codecs/cs4270.c. My I2C probe function is working, but the I2C subsystem cannot find my device. I know it's there, because U-Boot can probe it just fine.
At first, I thought my problem was this:
static struct i2c_driver cs4270_i2c_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "CS4270 I2C",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
},
.id = I2C_DRIVERID_CS4270,
.attach_adapter = cs4270_i2c_attach,
.detach_client = cs4270_i2c_detach,
};In a slightly older kernel (still 2.6.27), I had to change "CS4270 I2C" to "cs4270" to get it to work. However, that change no longer makes a difference.
I turned on debugging and this is what I see:
i2c-core: driver [CS4270 I2C] registered
i2c-adapter i2c-0: found normal entry for adapter 0, addr 0x48 i2c-adapter i2c-0: master_xfer[0] W, addr=0x48, len=0 i2c-adapter i2c-0: found normal entry for adapter 0, addr 0x49 i2c-adapter i2c-0: master_xfer[0] W, addr=0x49, len=0 i2c-adapter i2c-0: found normal entry for adapter 0, addr 0x4a i2c-adapter i2c-0: master_xfer[0] W, addr=0x4a, len=0 i2c-adapter i2c-0: found normal entry for adapter 0, addr 0x4b i2c-adapter i2c-0: master_xfer[0] W, addr=0x4b, len=0 i2c-adapter i2c-0: found normal entry for adapter 0, addr 0x4c i2c-adapter i2c-0: master_xfer[0] W, addr=0x4c, len=0 i2c-adapter i2c-0: master_xfer[0] W, addr=0x4c, len=1 i2c-adapter i2c-0: master_xfer[1] R, addr=0x4c, len=1 i2c-adapter i2c-0: found normal entry for adapter 0, addr 0x4d i2c-adapter i2c-0: master_xfer[0] W, addr=0x4d, len=0 i2c-adapter i2c-0: master_xfer[0] W, addr=0x4d, len=1 i2c-adapter i2c-0: master_xfer[1] R, addr=0x4d, len=1 i2c-adapter i2c-0: found normal entry for adapter 0, addr 0x4e i2c-adapter i2c-0: master_xfer[0] W, addr=0x4e, len=0 i2c-adapter i2c-0: found normal entry for adapter 0, addr 0x4f
My device is at address 4F. The device tree defines a node for this device. You can see it in arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8610_hpcd.dts.
When I change the device tree so that it lists the device at an address other than 4F, (e.g. "reg = <0x48>"), then my driver works.
So my conclusion is that specifying an I2C node in the device tree *requires* that the driver be new-style. Is there any way we can fix this? I'm not going to have time to update the CS4270 driver to a new-style interface before the 2.6.27 window closes.
Signature · 2 lines
Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale
Hi Timur,
Quoted 4 lines
So my conclusion is that specifying an I2C node in the device tree *requires* that the driver be new-style. Is there any way we can fix this? I'm not going to have time to update the CS4270 driver to a new-style interface before the 2.6.27 window closes.
This conclusion is correct. One possible way to fix this is to add support for blacklisting to drivers/of/base.c (untested):
[RFC] of: Support blacklisting and blacklist cs4270.
--- drivers/of/base.c | 8 +++++++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
drivers/of/base.c +7 -1
@@ -404,13 +404,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_matching_node);* assumed that the data size is small and that the compatible values * should already be distinct enough to differentiate between SPI, I2C * and other devices. +* +* Blacklisting devices is supported by using NULL as modalias. */ struct of_modalias_table {char *of_device;char *modalias; };static struct of_modalias_table of_modalias_table[] = { -/* Empty for now; add entries as needed */ +/* Blacklisting cs4270 as this driver is currently old-style. */ + {"cirrus,cs4270" ,NULL } };/**
@@ -441,6 +444,9 @@ int of_modalias_node(struct device_node *node, char *modalias, int len) compatible = of_modalias_table[i].of_device;if (!of_device_is_compatible (node, compatible))continue ; +/* Check for blacklisting */ +if (!of_modalias_table[i].modalias) +return -ENODEV ;strlcpy (modalias, of_modalias_table[i].modalias, len);return 0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
1.5.6.3
Quoted 9 lines · Jochen Friedrich
Hi Timur,
Quoted 4 lines
So my conclusion is that specifying an I2C node in the device tree *requires* that the driver be new-style. Is there any way we can fix this? I'm not going to have time to update the CS4270 driver to a new-style interface before the 2.6.27 window closes.
This conclusion is correct. One possible way to fix this is to add support for blacklisting to
drivers/of/base.c(untested):
No need. I posted a patch to alsa-devel that makes the CS4270 a new-style I2C driver. I'd hate to think that my driver is the only I2C driver used on PowerPC systems that was outdated. :-)
Signature · 2 lines
Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale