Remove duplicated unlikely() in IS_ERR()
Subsystems (6)
PATCH 1/1 Remove duplicated unlikely() in IS_ERR()
Hi
Some drivers have duplicated unlikely() macros.IS_ERR() already has unlikely() in itself.
This patch cleans up such pointless codes although there is no real effect on the kernel's behaviour.
Thanks,
Hirofumi Nakagawa
--- drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- fs/ubifs/find.c | 4 ++-- fs/ubifs/gc.c | 8 ++++---- fs/ubifs/tnc.c | 4 ++-- fs/ubifs/xattr.c | 2 +- net/ipv6/af_inet6.c | 2 +- 6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c +16 -16
@@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_status_read(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter) req =zfcp_fsf_req_create (adapter,FSF_QTCB_UNSOLICITED_STATUS ,ZFCP_REQ_NO_QTCB , adapter->pool.fsf_req_status_read); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (req))) { +if (IS_ERR (req)) { retval =PTR_ERR (req); goto out; }
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ struct zfcp_fsf_req *zfcp_fsf_abort_fcp_command(unsigned long old_req_id, goto out; req =zfcp_fsf_req_create (adapter,FSF_QTCB_ABORT_FCP_CMND , req_flags, adapter->pool.fsf_req_abort); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (req))) +if (IS_ERR (req)) goto out; if (unlikely(!(atomic_read(&unit->status) &
@@ -1112,7 +1112,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_send_ct(struct zfcp_send_ct *ct, mempool_t *pool, req =zfcp_fsf_req_create (adapter,FSF_QTCB_SEND_GENERIC ,ZFCP_REQ_AUTO_CLEANUP , pool); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (req))) { +if (IS_ERR (req)) { ret =PTR_ERR (req); goto out; }
@@ -1223,7 +1223,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_send_els(struct zfcp_send_els *els) goto out; req =zfcp_fsf_req_create (adapter,FSF_QTCB_SEND_ELS ,ZFCP_REQ_AUTO_CLEANUP ,NULL ); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (req))) { +if (IS_ERR (req)) { ret =PTR_ERR (req); goto out; }
@@ -1270,7 +1270,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_exchange_config_data(struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action)FSF_QTCB_EXCHANGE_CONFIG_DATA ,ZFCP_REQ_AUTO_CLEANUP , adapter->pool.fsf_req_erp); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (req))) { +if (IS_ERR (req)) { retval =PTR_ERR (req); goto out; }
@@ -1312,7 +1312,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_exchange_config_data_sync(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter, req =zfcp_fsf_req_create (adapter,FSF_QTCB_EXCHANGE_CONFIG_DATA ,0 ,NULL ); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (req))) { +if (IS_ERR (req)) { retval =PTR_ERR (req); goto out; }
@@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_exchange_port_data(struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action) req =zfcp_fsf_req_create (adapter,FSF_QTCB_EXCHANGE_PORT_DATA ,ZFCP_REQ_AUTO_CLEANUP , adapter->pool.fsf_req_erp); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (req))) { +if (IS_ERR (req)) { retval =PTR_ERR (req); goto out; }
@@ -1411,7 +1411,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_exchange_port_data_sync(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter, req =zfcp_fsf_req_create (adapter,FSF_QTCB_EXCHANGE_PORT_DATA ,0 ,NULL ); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (req))) { +if (IS_ERR (req)) { retval =PTR_ERR (req); goto out; }
@@ -1539,7 +1539,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_open_port(struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action)FSF_QTCB_OPEN_PORT_WITH_DID ,ZFCP_REQ_AUTO_CLEANUP , adapter->pool.fsf_req_erp); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (req))) { +if (IS_ERR (req)) { retval =PTR_ERR (req); goto out; }
@@ -1610,7 +1610,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_close_port(struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action) req =zfcp_fsf_req_create (adapter,FSF_QTCB_CLOSE_PORT ,ZFCP_REQ_AUTO_CLEANUP , adapter->pool.fsf_req_erp); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (req))) { +if (IS_ERR (req)) { retval =PTR_ERR (req); goto out; }
@@ -1707,7 +1707,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_close_physical_port(struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action) req =zfcp_fsf_req_create (adapter,FSF_QTCB_CLOSE_PHYSICAL_PORT ,ZFCP_REQ_AUTO_CLEANUP , adapter->pool.fsf_req_erp); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (req))) { +if (IS_ERR (req)) { retval =PTR_ERR (req); goto out; }
@@ -1882,7 +1882,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_open_unit(struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action) req =zfcp_fsf_req_create (adapter,FSF_QTCB_OPEN_LUN ,ZFCP_REQ_AUTO_CLEANUP , adapter->pool.fsf_req_erp); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (req))) { +if (IS_ERR (req)) { retval =PTR_ERR (req); goto out; }
@@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_close_unit(struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action) req =zfcp_fsf_req_create (adapter,FSF_QTCB_CLOSE_LUN ,ZFCP_REQ_AUTO_CLEANUP , adapter->pool.fsf_req_erp); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (req))) { +if (IS_ERR (req)) { retval =PTR_ERR (req); goto out; }
@@ -2228,7 +2228,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_send_fcp_command_task(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter, goto out; req =zfcp_fsf_req_create (adapter,FSF_QTCB_FCP_CMND , req_flags, adapter->pool.fsf_req_scsi); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (req))) { +if (IS_ERR (req)) { retval =PTR_ERR (req); goto out; }
@@ -2351,7 +2351,7 @@ struct zfcp_fsf_req *zfcp_fsf_send_fcp_ctm(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter, goto out; req =zfcp_fsf_req_create (adapter,FSF_QTCB_FCP_CMND , req_flags, adapter->pool.fsf_req_scsi); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (req))) +if (IS_ERR (req)) goto out; req->status |=ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_TASK_MANAGEMENT ;
@@ -2422,7 +2422,7 @@ struct zfcp_fsf_req *zfcp_fsf_control_file(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter, goto out; req =zfcp_fsf_req_create (adapter, fsf_cfdc->command,0 ,NULL ); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (req))) { +if (IS_ERR (req)) { retval = -EPERM ; goto out; }
fs/ubifs/find.c +2 -2
@@ -899,11 +899,11 @@ static int get_idx_gc_leb(struct ubifs_info *c)* it is needed now for this commit. */ lp =ubifs_lpt_lookup_dirty (c, lnum); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (lp))) +if (IS_ERR (lp))return PTR_ERR (lp); lp =ubifs_change_lp (c, lp,LPROPS_NC ,LPROPS_NC , lp->flags |LPROPS_INDEX ,-1 ); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (lp))) +if (IS_ERR (lp))return PTR_ERR (lp);dbg_find ("LEB %d, dirty %d and free %d flags %#x" , lp->lnum, lp->dirty, lp->free, lp->flags);
fs/ubifs/gc.c +4 -4
@@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ int ubifs_gc_start_commit(struct ubifs_info *c)*/ while (1 ) { lp =ubifs_fast_find_freeable (c); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (lp))) { +if (IS_ERR (lp)) { err =PTR_ERR (lp); goto out; }
@@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ int ubifs_gc_start_commit(struct ubifs_info *c)if (err) goto out; lp =ubifs_change_lp (c, lp, c->leb_size,0 , lp->flags,0 ); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (lp))) { +if (IS_ERR (lp)) { err =PTR_ERR (lp); goto out; }
@@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ int ubifs_gc_start_commit(struct ubifs_info *c)/* Record index freeable LEBs for unmapping after commit */ while (1 ) { lp =ubifs_fast_find_frdi_idx (c); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (lp))) { +if (IS_ERR (lp)) { err =PTR_ERR (lp); goto out; }
@@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ int ubifs_gc_start_commit(struct ubifs_info *c)/* Don't release the LEB until after the next commit */ flags = (lp->flags |LPROPS_TAKEN ) ^LPROPS_INDEX ; lp =ubifs_change_lp (c, lp, c->leb_size,0 , flags,1 ); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (lp))) { +if (IS_ERR (lp)) { err =PTR_ERR (lp);kfree (idx_gc); goto out;
fs/ubifs/tnc.c +2 -2
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static struct ubifs_znode *dirty_cow_znode(struct ubifs_info *c, } zn =copy_znode (c, znode); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (zn))) +if (IS_ERR (zn))return zn;if (zbr->len) {
@@ -1128,7 +1128,7 @@ static struct ubifs_znode *dirty_cow_bottom_up(struct ubifs_info *c,ubifs_assert (znode == c->zroot.znode); znode =dirty_cow_znode (c, &c->zroot); } -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (znode)) || !p) +if (IS_ERR (znode) || !p)break ;ubifs_assert (path[p -1 ] >=0 );ubifs_assert (path[p -1 ] < znode->child_cnt);
fs/ubifs/xattr.c +1 -1
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ ssize_t ubifs_listxattr(struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, size_t size)int type; xent =ubifs_tnc_next_ent (c, &key, &nm); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (xent))) { +if (IS_ERR (xent)) { err =PTR_ERR (xent);break ; }
net/ipv6/af_inet6.c +1 -1
@@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *ipv6_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb, int features) }rcu_read_unlock (); -if (unlikely (IS_ERR (segs))) +if (IS_ERR (segs)) goto out;for (skb = segs; skb; skb = skb->next) {
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.1
Hi
Quoted 5 lines · Hirofumi Nakagawa
Hi
Some drivers have duplicatedunlikely()macros.IS_ERR()already hasunlikely()in itself.
This patch cleans up such pointless codes although there is no real effect on the kernel's behaviour.
please, send an UBIFS-only patch and I'll put it to ubifs-2.6.git, thanks.
Signature · 2 lines
Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
Quoted 10 lines · Hirofumi Nakagawa
Hi
Some drivers have duplicatedunlikely()macros.IS_ERR()already hasunlikely()in itself.
This patch cleans up such pointless codes although there is no real effect on the kernel's behaviour.Thanks,
Hirofumi NakagawaSigned-off-by Hirofumi Nakagawa <[email protected]>
Quoted 8 lines
--- drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- fs/ubifs/find.c | 4 ++-- fs/ubifs/gc.c | 8 ++++---- fs/ubifs/tnc.c | 4 ++-- fs/ubifs/xattr.c | 2 +- net/ipv6/af_inet6.c | 2 +- 6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
Thanks for spotting and fixing this. Could you split the zfcp changes in a seperate patch? I will pick up the zfcp patch for a series of fixes that i have pending here.
Christof
Quoted 4 lines · Hirofumi Nakagawa
Some drivers have duplicated
unlikely()macros.IS_ERR()already hasunlikely()in itself.
This patch cleans up such pointless codes although there is no real effect on the kernel's behaviour.
sounds like a good check to add to checkpatch.pl ... -mike
Quoted 11 lines · Hirofumi Nakagawa
Hi
Some drivers have duplicatedunlikely()macros.IS_ERR()already hasunlikely()in itself.
This patch cleans up such pointless codes although there is no real effect on the kernel's behaviour.Thanks,
Hirofumi NakagawaSigned-off-by Hirofumi Nakagawa <[email protected]>---
Hmm, after thinking a bit I am not sure this is the right way to go. Indeed, we try to avoid likly()/unlikely(), unless this is really hot-path. Some kernel developers even think these hints should never be used. So I'd say, the right thing would bo to remove unlikely() from IS_ERR() macro instead.
Signature · 2 lines
Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
Quoted 10 lines · Artem Bityutskiy
Quoted 9 lines · Hirofumi Nakagawa
Hi
Some drivers have duplicatedunlikely()macros.IS_ERR()already hasunlikely()in itself.
This patch cleans up such pointless codes although there is no real effect on the kernel's behaviour.Thanks,
Hirofumi Nakagawa
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Hirofumi Nakagawa <[email protected]>---
Hmm, after thinking a bit I am not sure this is the right way to go. Indeed, we try to avoid likly()/unlikely(), unless this is really hot-path. Some kernel developers even think these hints should never be used. So I'd say, the right thing would bo to remove
unlikely()fromIS_ERR()macro instead.
OK, after some googling I tend to thing having unlikely() in IS_ERR() is OK, so I take your patch. Thanks.
Signature · 2 lines
Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
Hi,
Quoted 5 lines · Hirofumi Nakagawa
Hi
Some drivers have duplicatedunlikely()macros.IS_ERR()already hasunlikely()in itself.
This patch cleans up such pointless codes although there is no real effect on the kernel's behaviour.
Your patch did not apply cleanly, but I've done all the manual work and pushed UBIFS-related part of it to ubifs-2.6.git. Thanks.
Signature · 2 lines
Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)