4 ports bridge problem
Hi all,
I work on a SOC based on AMCC/glacier based on PPC460GT. (
http://WWW.AMCC.com <http://micrel.com/page.do?page=product-info/sys_on_chip.jsp>)
This component has 4 network interfaces.
Every one is connected to a PC.
eth0 =>192.168.1.11
eth1 => 192.168.1.22
eth2 => 192.168.1.33
eth3 => 192.168.1.44
I want to make a bridge with these 4 ports
#brctl addbr br0
#ifconfig br0 192.168.1.20 netmask 255.255.255.0
#ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up
#ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up
#ifconfig eth2 0.0.0.0 up
#ifconfig eth3 0.0.0.0 up
# brctl addif br0 eth0
# brctl addif br0 eth1
# brctl addif br0 eth2
# brctl addif br0 eth3
#brctl stp on
but my problem is that when I used the PC(which IP is 192.168.1.11/24) to ping other PCs,
the ping reply time from 192.168.1.22 was about 1000ms; the ping reply time from 192.168.1.33 was about 0.2ms; the ping reply time form 192.168.1.44 was about 300ms;
Why? and how to configure the 4 ethernet-ports glacier board to be a bridge or switch correctly? thanks a lot.
Thanks,
Cheng Zijing
Quoted 11 lines · On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 07:58:21 +0800 czj <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
I work on a SOC based on AMCC/glacier based on PPC460GT. (
http://WWW.AMCC.com <http://micrel.com/page.do?page=product-info/sys_on_chip.jsp>)
This component has 4 network interfaces.Every one is connected to a PC.
eth0 =>192.168.1.11
eth1 => 192.168.1.22
eth2 => 192.168.1.33
eth3 => 192.168.1.44
You have layer 2 and 3 confused. Are you sure you don't intend to route (layer 3) rather than bridging.
Quoted 24 lines
I want to make a bridge with these 4 ports
#brctl addbr br0
#ifconfig br0 192.168.1.20 netmask 255.255.255.0
#ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up
#ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up
#ifconfig eth2 0.0.0.0 up
#ifconfig eth3 0.0.0.0 up
# brctl addif br0 eth0# brctl addif br0 eth1# brctl addif br0 eth2# brctl addif br0 eth3#brctl stp on
Quoted 7 lines
but my problem is that when I used the PC(which IP is 192.168.1.11/24) to ping other PCs,
the ping reply time from 192.168.1.22 was about 1000ms; the ping reply time from 192.168.1.33 was about 0.2ms; the ping reply time form 192.168.1.44 was about 300ms;
Why? and how to configure the 4 ethernet-ports glacier board to be a bridge or switch correctly? thanks a lot.
Don't assign IP addresses to the ethernet devices, only one common address to the bridge.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Every one is connected to a PC.
eth0 =>192.168.1.11
eth1 => 192.168.1.22
eth2 => 192.168.1.33
eth3 => 192.168.1.44You have layer 2 and 3 confused. Are you sure you don't intend to route (layer 3) rather than bridging.
The IP addresses above seem to be the addresses of the connected PCs, not what is assigned to the interfaces. The commands mentioned later to set up the bridge seem okay.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
but my problem is that when I used the PC(which IP is 192.168.1.11/24) to ping other PCs,
the ping reply time from 192.168.1.22 was about 1000ms; the ping reply time from 192.168.1.33 was about 0.2ms; the ping reply time form 192.168.1.44 was about 300ms;
Why? and how to configure the 4 ethernet-ports glacier board to be a bridge or switch correctly? thanks a lot.
czj,
The bridge seems configured okay. (You have not mentioned "ifconfig
br0 up", but you must have done that if the bridge is working at all.) The delay could be due to many factors. Could be in the interfaces or their drivers, or could even be delay on the part of the host responding to ping. You could diagnose this further by taking packet captures (with tcpdump or wireshark) while you do the pings, both on the bridge and on the source and destination of the ping, and looking at the packet times in these.