xfstests: check for dmapi headers
PATCH 1/1 xfstests: check for dmapi headers
I'm no autoconf wizard, but I think this does the trick to allow xfstests build to succeed when dmapi headers are missing, as they probably will be for any distro that doesn't ship with dmapi in the kernel, or dmapi userspace.
AFAIK the dmapi-related tests all fail gracefully with "not run."
---
Makefile +2 -0
@@ -25,8 +25,10 @@ else $(SUBDIRS_MAKERULE) # automake doesn't always support "default" target # so do dmapi make explicitly with "all" +ifeq ($(HAVE_DMAPI), true) cd $(TOPDIR)/dmapi; make all endif +endif ifeq ($(HAVE_BUILDDEFS), yes) include $(BUILDRULES)
aclocal.m4 +5 -0
@@ -99,6 +99,11 @@ AC_DEFUN([AC_PACKAGE_WANT_AIO], AC_SUBST(have_aio) ]) +AC_DEFUN([AC_PACKAGE_WANT_DMAPI], + [ AC_CHECK_HEADERS(sys/dmapi/dmapi.h, [ have_dmapi=true ], [ have_dmapi=false ]) + AC_SUBST(have_dmapi) + ]) + AC_DEFUN([AC_PACKAGE_NEED_ATTR_XATTR_H], [ AC_CHECK_HEADERS([attr/xattr.h]) if test "$ac_cv_header_attr_xattr_h" != "yes"; then
configure.in +1 -0
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ in AC_PACKAGE_WANT_GDBM AC_PACKAGE_WANT_AIO + AC_PACKAGE_WANT_DMAPI ;; esac
include/builddefs.in +1 -0
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ RPM_VERSION = @rpm_version@ ENABLE_SHARED = @enable_shared@ HAVE_DB = @have_db@ HAVE_AIO = @have_aio@ +HAVE_DMAPI = @have_dmapi@ HAVE_ATTR_LIST = @have_attr_list@ GCCFLAGS = -funsigned-char -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall
Quoted 6 lines · Eric Sandeen
I'm no autoconf wizard, but I think this does the trick to allow xfstests build to succeed when dmapi headers are missing, as they probably will be for any distro that doesn't ship with dmapi in the kernel, or dmapi userspace.
AFAIK the dmapi-related tests all fail gracefully with "not run."
Looks sane to me, although the dmapi library can of course be shipped without kernel support - it's just rather useless that way :)
Quoted 11 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Quoted 6 lines · Eric Sandeen
I'm no autoconf wizard, but I think this does the trick to allow xfstests build to succeed when dmapi headers are missing, as they probably will be for any distro that doesn't ship with dmapi in the kernel, or dmapi userspace.
AFAIK the dmapi-related tests all fail gracefully with "not run."
Looks sane to me, although the dmapi library can of course be shipped without kernel support - it's just rather useless that way :)
true, but very, very little motivation for that :)
-Eric
Quoted 7 lines · Eric Sandeen
Quoted 6 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Quoted 5 lines · Eric Sandeen
I'm no autoconf wizard, but I think this does the trick to allow xfstests build to succeed when dmapi headers are missing, as they probably will be for any distro that doesn't ship with dmapi in the kernel, or dmapi userspace.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
AFAIK the dmapi-related tests all fail gracefully with "not run."
Looks sane to me, although the dmapi library can of course be shipped without kernel support - it's just rather useless that way :)
true, but very, very little motivation for that :)
$ dpkg -l libdm0\* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-==================-==================-==================================================== ii libdm0 2.2.8-1 Data Management API runtime environment ii libdm0-dev 2.2.8-1 Data Management API static libraries and headers $
Cheers,
Dave.
Signature · 2 lines
Dave Chinner [email protected]
Quoted 13 lines · Dave Chinner
Quoted 11 lines · Eric Sandeen
Quoted 9 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Quoted 6 lines · Eric Sandeen
I'm no autoconf wizard, but I think this does the trick to allow xfstests build to succeed when dmapi headers are missing, as they probably will be for any distro that doesn't ship with dmapi in the kernel, or dmapi userspace.
AFAIK the dmapi-related tests all fail gracefully with "not run."
Looks sane to me, although the dmapi library can of course be shipped without kernel support - it's just rather useless that way :)
true, but very, very little motivation for that :)
Quoted 9 lines
$ dpkg -l libdm0\* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-==================-==================-==================================================== ii libdm0 2.2.8-1 Data Management API runtime environment ii libdm0-dev 2.2.8-1 Data Management API static libraries and headers $
I meant my motivation ;)
-Eric