NAND support for OMAP3 EVM
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 NAND support for OMAP3 EVM
This patch adds support for detecting NAND flash on OMAP3 EVM boards. It clones similar code from the 3430 SDP board files.
--- arch/arm/configs/omap3_evm_defconfig | 11 +++- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm-flash.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
arch/arm/configs/omap3_evm_defconfig +10 -1
@@ -503,7 +503,16 @@ CONFIG_MTD_CFI_UTIL=y # CONFIG_MTD_DOC2000 is not set # CONFIG_MTD_DOC2001 is not set # CONFIG_MTD_DOC2001PLUS is not set -# CONFIG_MTD_NAND is not set +CONFIG_MTD_NAND=y +# CONFIG_MTD_NAND_VERIFY_WRITE is not set +# CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SMC is not set +# CONFIG_MTD_NAND_MUSEUM_IDS is not set +CONFIG_MTD_NAND_OMAP2=y +CONFIG_MTD_NAND_IDS=y +# CONFIG_MTD_NAND_DISKONCHIP is not set +# CONFIG_MTD_NAND_NANDSIM is not set +# CONFIG_MTD_NAND_PLATFORM is not set +# CONFIG_MTD_ALAUDA is not set CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND=y CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND_VERIFY_WRITE=y # CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND_GENERIC is not set
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm-flash.c +86 -13
150 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.5.6.6
Quoted 2 lines · Josh Karabin
This patch adds support for detecting NAND flash on OMAP3 EVM boards. It clones similar code from the 3430 SDP board files.
I hadn't seen the patch from Manikandan Pillai. This patch can (obviously) be ignored.
Tony Lindgren
maintainerQuoted 6 lines · Josh Karabin
Quoted 2 lines · Josh Karabin
This patch adds support for detecting NAND flash on OMAP3 EVM boards. It clones similar code from the 3430 SDP board files.
I hadn't seen the patch from Manikandan Pillai. This patch can (obviously) be ignored.
Looks like yours is more complete, so I'll use yours instead.
Tony
Quoted 9 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 4 lines · Josh Karabin
Quoted 2 lines · Josh Karabin
This patch adds support for detecting NAND flash on OMAP3 EVM boards. It clones similar code from the 3430 SDP board files.
I hadn't seen the patch from Manikandan Pillai. This patch can (obviously) be ignored.
Looks like yours is more complete, so I'll use yours instead.
Tony
Thanks.
- Josh