xfs_db problem
Hello,
Recently we've noticed that xfs_admin (xfs_db ver. 2.10.2) causes segfault or FP traps while trying
to use following command on FAT partition:
# xfs_admin -u /dev/sda1 xfs_admin: unexpected XFS SB magic number 0xeb58906d Floating point exception
and then makes error in dmesg:
xfs_db[10385] trap divide error ip:80b32b0 sp:fffbd900 error:0 in xfs_db[8048000+7f000]
We know that xfs_admin is dedicated tool for XFS only not for FAT or other filesystems,
but we would like to have xfs_db which will be able to cope with non-xfs filesystems also.
After some investigations we've found some place and put there exit(1) - in xfsprogs-2.10.2/db/init.c
in init() procedure:
(...)
sbp = &xmount.m_sb;
if (sbp->sb_magicnum != XFS_SB_MAGIC) {
fprintf(stderr, _("%s: unexpected XFS SB magic number
0x%08x\n"),
progname, sbp->sb_magicnum);
exit(1);
}
(...)Is it the right way to fix this problem?
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Quoted 37 lines · aluno
Hello,
Recently we've noticed that
xfs_admin(xfs_dbver. 2.10.2) causes segfault or FP traps while trying
to use following command on FAT partition:# xfs_admin -u /dev/sda1 xfs_admin: unexpected XFS SB magic number 0xeb58906d Floating point exceptionand then makes error in dmesg:
xfs_db[10385] trap divide error ip:80b32b0 sp:fffbd900 error:0 in xfs_db[8048000+7f000]
We know that
xfs_adminis dedicated tool for XFS only not for FAT or other filesystems,
but we would like to havexfs_dbwhich will be able to cope with non-xfs filesystems also.After some investigations we've found some place and put there exit(1) - in
xfsprogs-2.10.2/db/init.cin
init()procedure:(...) sbp = &xmount.m_sb; if (sbp->sb_magicnum != XFS_SB_MAGIC) { fprintf(stderr, _("%s: unexpected XFS SB magic number 0x%08x\n"), progname, sbp->sb_magicnum); exit(1); } (...)
Quoted 1 line
Is it the right way to fix this problem?
The thing is, xfs_db could in theory be used to *fix* the bad magic number, so refusing to continue might be a problem. But perhaps when invoked as xfs_admin, it should just bail out. It would be interesting to find where the actual failure is, though...
FWIW, I see a slightly different failure on a 128M vfat fs:
[root@host tmp]# file fsfile
fsfile: x86 boot sector, mkdosfs boot message display [root@host tmp]# xfs_admin -u fsfilexfs_admin: unexpected XFS SB magic number 0xeb3c906dxfs_admin: size check failedxfs_admin: failed to alloc 20875030464 bytes: Cannot allocate memory
It probably depends on the details of the (non-xfs) filesystem it's pointed at.
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Quoted 4 lines · Eric Sandeen
The thing is,
xfs_dbcould in theory be used to *fix* the bad magic number, so refusing to continue might be a problem. But perhaps when invoked asxfs_admin, it should just bail out. It would be interesting to find where the actual failure is, though...
We have bugzilla open for this, too. I think it's reasonable to get a warning, but not the additional problems when calling xfs_db directly because that's a low-level tool for people that know what they do.
But when called through wrappers like xfs_admin we should first do the magic number check. I think the proper way to implement this is to add an option to xfs_db to perform the magic number check, and make sure all the wrapper scripts set it, similar to how they already use -p <progname>.
Any volunteer to implement this? It should be fairly simple.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs